March 2018 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 19442] New: add patron attributes into the patron card creator
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '26

22 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19442 Bug ID: 19442 Summary: add patron attributes into the patron card creator Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Work to be done: 1 - Add the ability to define fields as attribute.CODE in the card creator template 2 - When these codes are found replace them with the correct value for the patron -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 19316] New: Items should have sort1 and sort2 fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Aug '26

21 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19316 Bug ID: 19316 Summary: Items should have sort1 and sort2 fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Database Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Librarians love data, like for real, they can't get enough. We often find that libraries want extra information in their items table, things that don't fit or don't belong in any of the existing columns. Borrowers have sort1 and sort2 for this kind of information - we should add analogous fields to the items table -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 55

[Bug 19814] New: Batch Check-in function
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Aug '26

21 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19814 Bug ID: 19814 Summary: Batch Check-in function Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: smichaelxx(a)tlen.pl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Hi, in Koha exists function named "Batch Check out" but there is no "Batch Check in". A lot of small libraries don't have self-check station. Maybe a good solution would be adding function "Batch Check in"? Thanks a lot Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 148

[Bug 16207] New: Incorporate circulation and fine rules for library groups
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Aug '26

20 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16207 Bug ID: 16207 Summary: Incorporate circulation and fine rules for library groups Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com I think we could simplify circulation and fine rules by incorporating library groups into the mix. For example, I have 27 libraries, and 8 of them follow the same set of rules that are different from the defaults. So, what if instead of cloning these special rules to 8 different libraries (and who knows how many other duplicated sets of rules there are), we defined a set of rules for a library group. If the library is part of that group, it goes by those rules. I don't know if we want to use the same library groups that are already defined in the libraries and groups, or if we want to create a unique Circ rule group. Because, there is always the chance that one or more of the libraries in the 8 that are grouped together by affiliation or region could have a slightly different set of rules. However, I think rules by groups would make managing rules far less complicated than managing groups of cloned rules. Christopher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 19938] New: Refactor C4::Overdues::checkoverdues
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Aug '26

19 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19938 Bug ID: 19938 Summary: Refactor C4::Overdues::checkoverdues Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mtompset(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com While retesting a bug, I ran a prove -r -v t, which generated a lot of log noise. One such entry was: [Tue Jan 9 03:54:58 2018] starman: Use of uninitialized value $overdues_count in numeric gt (>) at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/opac/opac-main.pl line 76. The $overdues_count was set by a call to checkoverdues. Reading the code I noticed someone actually commented: # returning the count and the results is silly So, this is a refactor of the function and all the calls. It was surprisingly small. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 41

[Bug 20307] New: Language overlay for authorized values
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Aug '26

14 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20307 Bug ID: 20307 Summary: Language overlay for authorized values Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 14100 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14100 [Bug 14100] Add base to make item types, branch names, sysprefs values and authorised values translatable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 146

[Bug 17677] New: Move C4::Circulation code to the Koha namespace
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Aug '26

10 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17677 Bug ID: 17677 Summary: Move C4::Circulation code to the Koha namespace Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 15851] New: "Analytics: Show analytics" showing regardless of whether they have analytics.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Aug '26

07 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15851 Bug ID: 15851 Summary: "Analytics: Show analytics" showing regardless of whether they have analytics. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: ed.veal(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl All of records where position 7 of the leader indicates serial automatically display "Analytics: Show analytics" -- regardless of whether they have analytics. To confirm, we linked numerous items to host records in the case where monographic volumes were bound together via the "Link to Host Item" feature, automatically creating 773s. These are not in question and we do not want to make any changes that would affect them. The request is to remove the display "Analytics: Show analytics" for periodical records that do not have analytics. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 114

[Bug 18064] New: Long overdue cronjob does not follow the library' s calendar and skip closed days
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Aug '26

05 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18064 Bug ID: 18064 Summary: Long overdue cronjob does not follow the library's calendar and skip closed days Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jzairo(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The cronjob that sets the Long overdue does not follow the library's calendar and skip closed days. However, the cronjob that sends the email (overdue notices) does follow the library's calendar. So as an example on a weekend where Monday is a holiday, the long over due may get set and chanrge the patrons account, but the email may be sent a day or 2 later. It would be good to allow the long overdue cron to follow the library calendar and skip closed days. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 84

[Bug 16631] New: Show groups/categories of reports to authorized staff
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Aug '26

05 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16631 Bug ID: 16631 Summary: Show groups/categories of reports to authorized staff Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be helpful to have reports that are specific groups/categories to be authorized under the reports permissions in a patron account. Not everyone wants to see everyone else's reports, some are similar but are not. Some are for superlibrarians to test, and are not ready for use. It would be great if we could specify groups and even subgroups in the permissions that the staff could access, or specify all groups. All groups should be the norm for a superlibrarian. Christopher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 282