February 2026 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 41648] New: KitchenSink plugin breaks the plugins home page
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Aug '26

03 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41648 Bug ID: 41648 Summary: KitchenSink plugin breaks the plugins home page Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Plugin architecture Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Install the KitchenSink plugin and you get: Template process failed: undef error - The given date (20-12-20) does not match the date format (iso) at /kohadevbox/koha/Koha/DateUtils.pm line 192. on /cgi-bin/koha/plugins/plugins-home.pl Because Koha/Plugin/Com/ByWaterSolutions/KitchenSink.pm: date_updated => "1900-01-01", -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 41780] New: Show firstname if preferred_name is empty in moremember.tt
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Aug '26

03 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41780 Bug ID: 41780 Summary: Show firstname if preferred_name is empty in moremember.tt Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: ayoub.glizi-vicioso(a)inLibro.com Reporter: ayoub.glizi-vicioso(a)inLibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com Depends on: 28633 Since bz28633, the patron's firstname is no longer displayed in the staff interface (moremember.tt) if the 'preferred_name' field is NULL or empty. This issue occurs when patrons are imported via external scripts (like Activitek) that do not automatically populate 'preferred_name' with the 'firstname' value. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28633 [Bug 28633] Add a preferred name field to patrons -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 57

[Bug 38712] New: Order My Lists options alphabetically
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Aug '26

03 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38712 Bug ID: 38712 Summary: Order My Lists options alphabetically Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: chloe.zermatten(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In the top header navigation menu on the Koha OPAC, sets the order of the 'My Lists' dropdown to be sorted alphabetically instead of by modification date. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 28

[Bug 28862] New: Add suffix to name field
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Aug '26

03 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28862 Bug ID: 28862 Summary: Add suffix to name field Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: rcoert(a)arlingtonva.us QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Requesting the addition to the name field for suffix entries (Jr., Sr. III, etc.). Ideally it would be a drop-down box that could be prepopulated (auth_value?) with common entries; allowing for cleaner data and easier account viewing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 31391] New: Staff-side recalls
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Aug '26

03 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31391 Bug ID: 31391 Summary: Staff-side recalls Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Add functionality for recalls to be placed via the staff interface -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 311

[Bug 39589] New: Search returns 'No results found' despite existing matching records
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Aug '26

03 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39589 Bug ID: 39589 Summary: Search returns 'No results found' despite existing matching records Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: hammat.wele(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This issue occurs when the records on the first page of results are not displayed. The message "No results found" is shown, and it is not possible to access records on other pages. To test 1. Set the following system preferences: OPACnumSearchResults to 5 OpacHiddenItemsHidesRecord to Hide OpacHiddenItems to withdrawn: [1] 2. Create 6 bibliographic records with the following titles: "notice test 1" "notice test 2" "notice test 3" "notice test 4" "notice test 5" "notice test 6" 3. For the first 5 records, add an item with Withdrawn status. 4. For "notice test 6", add an item with Available status. 5. In the OPAC interface, search for "notice test". ---> The message "No results found!" appears, and "notice test 6" is not visible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 44

[Bug 36369] New: Make APIClient be more useful
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Aug '26

03 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36369 Bug ID: 36369 Summary: Make APIClient be more useful Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I file this report for discussion. In my opinion, there's too much duplicated code on the API client libraries. And the APIClient "class" is just a shortcut to avoid instantiating the module-specific API clients: ```javascript import ERMAPIClient from "./erm-api-client"; ... export const APIClient = { erm: new ERMAPIClient(), ``` Then used everywhere like this: ```javascript import { APIClient } from "../../fetch/api-client.js" ... const client = APIClient.erm await client.agreements.count().then( ``` IMHO, we need a real APIClient class that would implement generic methods like: ```javascript create: params => this.post({ endpoint: params.endpoint ? params.endpoint : "/", body: params.resource, headers: params.headers }), ... getAll: params => this.get({ endpoint: params.endpoint ? params.endpoint : "/", params.query, headers: params.headers, }), ... count: params => this.count({ endpoint: params.endpoint ? params.endpoint : "/", "?" + new URLSearchParams({ _page: 1, _per_page: 1, ...(params.query && { q: JSON.stringify(params.query) }), }), }), ``` and the API Client classes (like ERMAPIClient) should inherit from it, somehow. For doing so, we will face another design roadblock: While I uderstand that ERMAPIClient is a single place to have all the ERM module-needed API actions, it still feels weird from an OOP perspective how things are organized. I feel like we should have individual classes, like: ```javascript export RecordSourcesAPIClient extends APIClient ``` and then have a new type of class along this lines: ```javascript import CitiesAPIClient from "./cities-api-client"; import RecordSourcesAPIClient from "./record-sources-api-client"; ... export const AdminAPIClient = { cities: new CitiesAPIClient(), record_sources: new RecordSourcesAPIClient(), ... }; ``` this way, we will avoid repeating ourselves (less bugs!) and the code is (I expect) more reusable. I also think the `embed` handling should just be a list for the different methods, like: embed: [ 'patron', 'patron.category' ] and generically handled by APIClient. No need to build the headers manually everywhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 53

[Bug 29768] New: hidepatronname hides guarantor name on borrower edit screen
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Aug '26

03 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29768 Bug ID: 29768 Summary: hidepatronname hides guarantor name on borrower edit screen Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 20.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: bdaeuber(a)cityoffargo.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com The syspref hidepatronname is now hiding the guarantor name on memberentry.pl. This seems like a strange place to enforce that system preference since it's convenient for staff to be able to double check that info when editing patron information and personal information is already showing on that screen. It's not enforced on other patron details screens (such as moremember.pl) and I don't think it should impact patron edit screen either. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 53

[Bug 30144] New: Add support for EDI GIR:LVT, Servicing instructions, segment
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Aug '26

03 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30144 Bug ID: 30144 Summary: Add support for EDI GIR:LVT, Servicing instructions, segment Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We allow for free text instructions in the EDI FTX segment now, taken from the vendor notes field. But this is at the order level, it would be helpful to add support for the LVT segment at the line level. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 73

[Bug 40445] New: Point of Sale reconciliation input during daily summaries
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Aug '26

03 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40445 Bug ID: 40445 Summary: Point of Sale reconciliation input during daily summaries Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Point of Sale Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: hdunne-howrie(a)westminster.gov.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: martin.renvoize(a)openfifth.co.uk We use a separate spreadsheet for our daily reconciliation of income taken which uses the cash register summaries. It occurs to me that this process can be streamlined by allowing an input stage to the summaries process so staff interaction with summaries is not the cashing up to package the transactions into a summary (we want the daily summaries to happen automatically) we want the staff input to be to add in (against totals for payment type and cash register) the amount of what was actually taken using the z reports and physical cash, i.e. a reconciliation stage so it will be easy for staff to see if the money is 'out' and then a process to reconciliate with a way to add in a note for the summary they are signing off with an perhaps a way for them to then 'balance the books' to account for the discrepancy. We would then need this staff input on the summaries (the physical amount taken and any notes) to be stored in a table, somewhere logical, so we can then report on this and create a way in which library managers can check in on this if needed and audit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 342