May 2008 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 1629] RSS Feeds of search results in the OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 19 May '08

19 May '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1629 jmf(a)liblime.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #7 from jmf(a)liblime.com 2008-05-19 12:38 ------- This has been fixed, new parameter format=rss2 and format=atom; closing out. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2143] New: Funds & Budgets Adding Needs Tweaking
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 19 May '08

19 May '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2143 Summary: Funds & Budgets Adding Needs Tweaking Product: Koha Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: Acquisitions AssignedTo: rch(a)liblime.com ReportedBy: nicole.engard(a)liblime.com QAContact: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha.org When adding funds & budgets after adding a budget you're brought to the budgets search/list - this is a bit annoying since I still had more funds/budgets to add - can there be a shortcut link back to adding? Or some design edit to make it easy to go back and forth? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2141] Bib search can retrieve deleted bibs
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 19 May '08

19 May '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2141 ------- Comment #1 from galen.charlton(a)liblime.com 2008-05-19 12:29 ------- Patch submitted to fix the carp. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2142] New: maxItemsInSearchResults No longer used
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 19 May '08

19 May '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2142 Summary: maxItemsInSearchResults No longer used Product: Koha Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: System Administration AssignedTo: paul.poulain(a)free.fr ReportedBy: nicole.engard(a)liblime.com QAContact: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha.org maxItemsInSearchResults should not be an option anymore, as it's no longer used. JMF - This syspref is deprecated -- it used to specify what the max number of items to display for every bib entry in the results. It was needed because some bibs have several hundred items attached and it wasn't economical to display them all ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2141] New: Bib search can retrieve deleted bibs
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 19 May '08

19 May '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2141 Summary: Bib search can retrieve deleted bibs Product: Koha Version: HEAD Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Searching AssignedTo: jmf(a)liblime.com ReportedBy: galen.charlton(a)liblime.com QAContact: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha.org Assuming that Zebra is used, if a bib record is deleted in Koha, there can be a period of time when the bib is retrieved from a Zebra search even though it is no longer present in the database. This twilight period lasts until the zebraqueue table is processed by rebuild_zebra.pl -z or zebraqueue_daemon.pl. If a user clicks on such a bib on results list, the OPAC will return a 404. This is actually useful, since the same opac-details.pl page is what a user might use to permalink a bib, but instead of using the default 404.pl template, one that specifically says that a bib is missing (and was recently deleted) would make more sense to the patron. When the same thing happens in the staff interface, Koha carps: Can't call method "field" on an undefined value at /home/gmc/koha/dev/C4/Biblio.pm line 944. A patch is forthcoming that will instead redirect to the default 404. A special case is when the deleted bib is the only result for the search - in that case, redirecting to any 404 page is a mistake, as it makes the user think that the search is broken. When only one hit is returned, it is probably worth the RDMS query hit to make sure that the bib exists before redirecting to details.pl. The three display issues aside, this bug is a placeholder for the larger issue of whether it is possible to keep the Zebra search results perfectly in sync with the DB (at least for deleted bibs) without having to query the RDMS for every bib in the hitlist. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1621] Subtitle missing from all results and detail screens
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 19 May '08

19 May '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1621 jmf(a)liblime.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #6 from jmf(a)liblime.com 2008-05-19 12:02 ------- OK, I've tested this and it appears to work well. Thanks Galen! ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1573] Clean patron records does not work
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 19 May '08

19 May '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1573 jmf(a)liblime.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|blocker |normal Priority|PATCH-Sent |P3 ------- Comment #5 from jmf(a)liblime.com 2008-05-19 12:01 ------- Agreed. I've tested and downgraded it. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2139] Order Forgetting Library
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 19 May '08

19 May '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2139 henridamien(a)koha-fr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rch(a)liblime.com |henridamien(a)koha-fr.org ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2140] New: LabelMARCView doesn't distinguish between economical and standard views
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 19 May '08

19 May '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2140 Summary: LabelMARCView doesn't distinguish between economical and standard views Product: Koha Version: rel_3_0 Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: MARC Bibliographic data support AssignedTo: galen.charlton(a)liblime.com ReportedBy: jmf(a)liblime.com QAContact: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha.org In the expanded label views of MARC data in OPAC and Staff Clients, this syspref used to specify whether to list repeated fields within a single or multiple fields. For instance: 650 $a Cats 650 $a Dogs would display as: 650 $a Cats $a Dogs In the Economical view, but according to the standard if 'standard' were set. Currently, the Economical view is the default (which makes it look like data is corrupted in Koha) -- the standard view doesn't display any differently. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2139] New: Order Forgetting Library
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 19 May '08

19 May '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2139 Summary: Order Forgetting Library Product: Koha Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Acquisitions AssignedTo: rch(a)liblime.com ReportedBy: nicole.engard(a)liblime.com QAContact: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha.org When I first places an order, I ordered for library X but when I go to receive the oder the library is defaulting to the first library on the pull down (alpha order). How do I know what library I originally ordered for? This data should carry over from order to receiving. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0