November 2016 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 14048] Change RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn to be branch specific
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14048 --- Comment #97 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- There is one occurrence left: C4/Installer.pm: push @fnames, C4::Context->config('intranetdir') . "/installer/data/mysql/mandatory/refund_lost_item_fee_rules.sql"; Please fix! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15449] Move stuffs to the Koha namespace
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15449 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |17628 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- Bug 17628 - Move bibliographic related code to Koha::Biblio Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17628 [Bug 17628] Move bibliographic related code to Koha::Biblio -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 12026] Shibboleth auto-provisioning
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12026 --- Comment #21 from Mirko Tietgen <mirko(a)abunchofthings.net> --- Created attachment 57486 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=57486&action=ed… Bug 12026 Fix small errors When running tests I got two errors. Do these changes make sense? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 6979] LDAP authentication fails during password comparison
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6979 --- Comment #23 from Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud(a)biblibre.com> --- Patch rebased on master -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 6979] LDAP authentication fails during password comparison
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6979 --- Comment #22 from Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud(a)biblibre.com> --- Created attachment 57483 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=57483&action=ed… Bug 6979 - Fix Already in a transaction error -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 6979] LDAP authentication fails during password comparison
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6979 Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud(a)biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #46863|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #21 from Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud(a)biblibre.com> --- Created attachment 57482 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=57482&action=ed… Bug 6979 - Handle multiple branches in non-auth_by_bin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 6979] LDAP authentication fails during password comparison
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6979 Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud(a)biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #46659|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #20 from Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud(a)biblibre.com> --- Created attachment 57481 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=57481&action=ed… Bug 6979 - Update tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 6979] LDAP authentication fails during password comparison
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6979 Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud(a)biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #46654|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #19 from Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud(a)biblibre.com> --- Created attachment 57480 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=57480&action=ed… Bug #6979 I removed several lines of code in the checkpw_ldap subroutine where LDAP authentication takes place, in the "else" part of the conditional that checks for the auth_by_bind config parameter. I added several lines to check whether the user can log in to LDAP using their DN and the password supplied in the login form. If they are able to bind, login contiues as normal and the LDAP attributes can be harvested as normal if the update options are turned on. The routine that was in place was failing because it was trying to check against a non-existent LDAP entry attribute called 'userpassword'. Instead of checking against a 'userpassword' attribute, the routine really should be checking to make sure the user can actually bind to LDAP. That's what I set up, and it is a safer way to test authentication against LDAP. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 12769] Notice fee management
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12769 Roger Grossmann <roger.grossmann(a)lmscloud.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roger.grossmann(a)lmscloud.de --- Comment #37 from Roger Grossmann <roger.grossmann(a)lmscloud.de> --- Hi all, I wonder why this development ended a year ago without an agreed change. There is a need for notice fees in many libraries. Summarizing the discussion there seem to be the following requirements: - charge notice fees depending on the delivery channel (mail, email, sms) - charge notice fees depending on the message type or letter - charge notice fees depending on the branch and user group The original RFC requires for each different combination of a above parameters to create a different letter. As it can be a complex task to manage all letter configurations, it also does not feel logical to assign a notice fee to a letter independently to whom and when I send it. On the other hand, assigning one and the same price for mail, email and sms (as Jonathans solution suggests) will also not meet requirements of all users if since costs for a mail post, email or sms are typically different. And it would only cover notice fees for overdues. A possible solution for a notice fee configuration that could meet all above requirements would be a separate notice fee configuration that provides the following parameters: - branch library ('' for all libraries) - channel ('' for all channnels) - letter ('' for all letters) - user group ('' for all user groups) - notice fee As with circulation and fine rules, there could be general and specific settings. A general rule could be for example to charge 0.70 for each mail letter and 0.5 for sms independent of the branch or user group. A more specific rule could be to charge nothing for staff members for both delivery types. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15533] Allow patrons and librarians to select itemtype when placing hold
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15533 --- Comment #36 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #33) > Pushed to Master - should be in the May 2016 - Release. Thanks Katrin! 16.05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0