October 2018 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 15139] Show non-public item note in overdues report
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Oct '18

24 Oct '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15139 Bug 15139 depends on bug 21463, which changed state. Bug 21463 Summary: Library is no longer displayed in the overdue list https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21463 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Pushed to Stable |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 21463] New: Library is not longer displayed in the overdue list
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Oct '18

24 Oct '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21463 Bug ID: 21463 Summary: Library is not longer displayed in the overdue list Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Depends on: 18789 Caused by commit 0ab22e1c7c6b6e8d14a4fb7478ab2a3d42da347d Bug 18789: Send Koha::Patron object to the templates Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18789 [Bug 18789] Send a Koha::Patron object to the templates -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 10382] collection not returning to null when removed from course reserves
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Oct '18

24 Oct '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10382 Fridolin SOMERS <fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.co | |m --- Comment #82 from Fridolin SOMERS <fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com> --- Pushed to 17.11.x for 17.11.11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15032] [Plack] Scripts that fork (like stage-marc-import.pl) don't work as expected
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Oct '18

24 Oct '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15032 David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook(a)prosentient.com.au --- Comment #25 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- I figure one way or another we need to have a solid solution for background processing of tasks. I'm running into a related issue with someone trying to do batch_record_modification.pl with a large number of records, but there are a million other use cases that require it. We've been talking about this issue for years, and I'm wondering if this is something where plugins might be useful. Tomas suggested an approach to me at Kohacon where Koha has a default built-in functionality, but then lets you use plugins to override that built-in functionality. Maybe we could make the hooks a "developer feature"? So the hook is only run in "developer mode", but that lets many developers write their own plugins to try and find something that works? And maybe the best plugin gets adopted by Koha to replace the default functionality, which I'm sure we all agree is not good enough right now. I wrote my own job server using POE::Component::JobQueue for #10662 and it works pretty well, but I'm sure it could be better. But I'd be happy to contribute a plugin for people to try out. I can't guarantee it would be the best solution, but it would be "a" solution. (With 10662, the job server runs as a standalone daemon process, and Koha, whether CGI or PSGI, connects to the daemon using a UNIX socket and uses JSON messages for talking about jobs.) There are lots of other options out there. I think Minion might be a good one since it's within the Mojolicious family. I was thinking of using it, but I think I didn't as it wasn't interactive enough for my purposes, but... I figure we should try out some things rather than just be in discussion forever? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8643] Add important constraint to MARC tags and subfields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Oct '18

23 Oct '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8643 Pierre-Marc Thibault <pierre-marc.thibault(a)inlibro.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff --- Comment #74 from Pierre-Marc Thibault <pierre-marc.thibault(a)inlibro.com> --- All the old patches have been merged to make tests easier. The new patch is rebased and solves the last problems mentioned. The tab char is gone, the style attributes too and the inputs order is now correct. It seems there is no problem with the alert message, it will be to confirme with other tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8643] Add important constraint to MARC tags and subfields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Oct '18

23 Oct '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8643 --- Comment #73 from Pierre-Marc Thibault <pierre-marc.thibault(a)inlibro.com> --- Created attachment 81032 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=81032&action=ed… Bug 8643: Add important constraint to marc subfields This fix permits to add an "Important" option to the marc structure pages. Testing: 1) Apply the patch 2) Run updatedatabase.pl 3) Regenerate CSS 4) Define 100 as an "important" field ( Administration » MARC bibliographic framework » MARC structure ( Default Frameword) » Edit ) 5) Define 100$a as an "important" subfield (Administration » MARC bibliographic framework » MARC structure (Default Frameword) » Subfield » Onglet a) 6) Edit a record to clear the field 100 (subfields are all blank) 7) Save the record. 8) Validate the following message: A few important fields are not filled: * tag 100 subfield a Nom de personne in tab * Field 100 is important, at least one of its subfields should be filled. Are you sure you want to save? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15395] Internationalization: plural forms, context, and more
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Oct '18

23 Oct '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15395 --- Comment #103 from Julian Maurice <julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #101) > So, from what I understand the third form (for 0) will be not supported, > unless we change the Plural-Forms (are we really supposed to change that?). I don't think we are supposed to. The simple solution would be to always use the {count} so we would have "0 exemplaire" and "1 exemplaire". Or we could handle this in the code: [% IF count %] [% tnx('{count} item', '{count} items', count, { count = count }) %] [% ELSE %] [% t('Not a single item!') %] [% END %] I think there is no best solution here and both can be used. Sometimes we want to display a different message when there are 0 "things", and sometimes not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8643] Add important constraint to MARC tags and subfields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Oct '18

23 Oct '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8643 Pierre-Marc Thibault <pierre-marc.thibault(a)inlibro.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #74267|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8643] Add important constraint to MARC tags and subfields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Oct '18

23 Oct '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8643 Pierre-Marc Thibault <pierre-marc.thibault(a)inlibro.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #74268|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8643] Add important constraint to MARC tags and subfields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Oct '18

23 Oct '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8643 Pierre-Marc Thibault <pierre-marc.thibault(a)inlibro.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #74269|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0