December 2018 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 21782] New: Release team 18.11
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Nov '24

16 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21782 Bug ID: 21782 Summary: Release team 18.11 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: About Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 16

[Bug 19904] New: Release team 18.05
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Nov '24

16 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19904 Bug ID: 19904 Summary: Release team 18.05 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: About Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 18303 Updating about team page for 18.05 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18303 [Bug 18303] Release team omnibus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 19

[Bug 19397] New: Release team 17.11
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Nov '24

16 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19397 Bug ID: 19397 Summary: Release team 17.11 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: About Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Updating about team page for 17.11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 18302] New: Release team 17.05
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Nov '24

16 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18302 Bug ID: 18302 Summary: Release team 17.05 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: About Assignee: nengard(a)gmail.com Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 17798] New: Checking out an item on hold for another patron prints a slip but does not update hold
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Nov '24

14 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17798 Bug ID: 17798 Summary: Checking out an item on hold for another patron prints a slip but does not update hold Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com To recreate: Place a hold for patron A Do not confirm the hold Checkout that item to Patron B See the options including 'Don't checkout and print slip' Print the slip Check the item record The hold has not been confirmed and the item 'last seen' is not updated For consistency printing should confirm the hold as well and mark the item waiting or initiate a transfer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 37

[Bug 22042] New: BlockReturnofWithdrawn Items does not block refund generation when item is withdrawn and lost
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Nov '24

14 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22042 Bug ID: 22042 Summary: BlockReturnofWithdrawn Items does not block refund generation when item is withdrawn and lost Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- If BlockReturnofWithdrawnItems is set to block and an item that is both withdrawn and lost is checked in, Koha will not mark the item as returned but will mark it as found and generate a refund if circ rules allow refunds. To test: - Set BlockReturnofWithdrawnItems to Block - Set BlockReturnofLostItems to Don't Block - Set Default lost item fee refund on return policy to Yes - Check out an item with a replacement cost to a patron - Mark the item as lost - Mark the item as withdrawn - Note that the patron now has a charge for the replacement fee - Check the item in - Note that the patron now has a credit for the replacement fee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 31

[Bug 17318] New: Make 'Normalization rule' configurable on matchpoint definition
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17318 Bug ID: 17318 Summary: Make 'Normalization rule' configurable on matchpoint definition Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently, there's a free text field on matchpoint definition, that is of no use, as the code does some default normalization no matter what you put there (se screenshot). As pointed out on 17304 and other bugs, this normalization routine is counter productive. The purpose of this bug is to introduce a way for defining the normalization rules we'd like to apply. IT will make use of bug 17302 to have a small (but useful) list of normalization routines. This could be expanded if needed, or we could even make plugins do it (that'd certaintly belong to another bug report). I don't think removing the 'feature' is a good move now, but we could consider it with broader discussion. Someone should rise it in koha-devel, meetings, etc. This will provide a way out, until we end that fine-grained discussion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 36

[Bug 20558] New: typo mts_authorized_value vs mts_authorised_value in admin/marctagstructure.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20558 Bug ID: 20558 Summary: typo mts_authorized_value vs mts_authorised_value in admin/marctagstructure.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org What are the consequences of this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 16264] New: Confirm message on deleting an authority framework subfield
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Nov '24

07 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16264 Bug ID: 16264 Summary: Confirm message on deleting an authority framework subfield Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: aleishaamohia(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Just using this as an example because it appears in many places on the intranet Is there a reason that we navigate to a new page to confirm or cancel a delete rather than just using a Javascript confirm message? A JS message would use much less code. I realise that in the past we had a rule that everything had to work without JS enabled but a lot of stuff on the intranet wouldn't work at all without JS so I'm not sure how much that applies anymore. Anyway, just wondering if these extra pages for confirm or cancelling a delete are still necessary or if we can do this via JS now :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 21366] New: add plack reload
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Nov '24

07 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21366 Bug ID: 21366 Summary: add plack reload Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Packaging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: mirko(a)abunchofthings.net Starman daemon as an option to ask for "reload" meaning the renew of all workers, like Apache graceful restart. Starman restart will kill at once the master process and workers. Starman reload will not impact the master process, it will kill and recreate idle workers, it will wait for busy workers to end before renew them. It is a nice way to refresh the plack middleware without impacting any running page, mostly useful for production servers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 50