May 2020 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 4850] CheckReserves does not respect holds circulation policies
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 May '20

21 May '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=4850 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=23172 CC| |jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-c | |ommunity.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 22917] New: Circulation.t fails if tests are ran slowly
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 May '20

21 May '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22917 Bug ID: 22917 Summary: Circulation.t fails if tests are ran slowly Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- After bug 21213 we wanted to know why Circulation.t was failing randomly on a given test. Since it is pushed, it failed (at least) twice, with the same error: # Failed test 'AddReturn must have debarred the patron' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 3112. # got: '' # expected: '1' # AddReturn returned message $VAR1 = { # 'WasReturned' => 1 # }; # Failed test 'Test at line 1918' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 3116. # got: '0' # expected: '1' # Failed test 'Test at line 1918' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 3119. # got: undef # expected: '2019-05-30' # Looks like you failed 3 tests of 21. The test at line 3113 expects the flags 'WasReturned' and 'Debarred' to be set, but only WasReturned is. Which means the patron has not been debarred. It is not because the checkout has not been detected as overdue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 27

[Bug 23234] New: Circulation.t failing on June 28th 2019
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 May '20

21 May '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23234 Bug ID: 23234 Summary: Circulation.t failing on June 28th 2019 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Not sure what is behind this. kohadev-koha@kohadevbox:/home/vagrant/kohaclone$ date Fri Jun 28 13:02:16 -05 2019 kohadev-koha@kohadevbox:/home/vagrant/kohaclone$ prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t # Failed test 'Cannot auto renew, too late - no_auto_renewal_after is inclusive(returned code is auto_too_late)' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 691. # got: 'auto_too_soon' # expected: 'auto_too_late' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 14. # Failed test 'too_late_renewal / no_auto_renewal_after' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 722. # Failed test 'GetLatestAutoRenewDate should return -5 days if no_auto_renewal_after = 5 and date_due is 10 days before' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 862. # got: '2019-06-23T18:01:00' # expected: '2019-06-23T18:01:00' # Failed test 'GetLatestAutoRenewDate should return +5 days if no_auto_renewal_after = 15 and date_due is 10 days before' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 869. # got: '2019-07-03T18:01:00' # expected: '2019-07-03T18:01:00' # Failed test 'GetLatestAutoRenewDate should return +2 days if no_auto_renewal_after_hard_limit is defined and not no_auto_renewal_after' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 876. # got: '2019-06-30T00:00:00' # expected: '2019-06-30T00:00:00' # Failed test 'GetLatestAutoRenewDate should return +2 days if no_auto_renewal_after_hard_limit is < no_auto_renewal_after' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 882. # got: '2019-06-30T00:00:00' # expected: '2019-06-30T00:00:00' # Looks like you failed 4 tests of 5. # Failed test 'GetLatestAutoRenewDate' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 887. # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 71. # Failed test 'CanBookBeRenewed tests' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 998. # Failed test 'AddReturn must have debarred the patron' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 86. # got: '' # expected: '1' # AddReturn returned message $VAR1 = { # 'WasReturned' => 1 # }; # Failed test 'Test at line 1967' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 90. # got: '0' # expected: '1' # Failed test 'Test at line 1967' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 93. # got: undef # expected: '2019-07-12' # Looks like you failed 3 tests of 21. # Failed test 'AddReturn + suspension_chargeperiod' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 1976. # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 45. t/db_dependent/Circulation.t .. Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) Failed 2/45 subtests Test Summary Report ------------------- t/db_dependent/Circulation.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 45 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 15, 29 Non-zero exit status: 2 Files=1, Tests=45, 27 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.01 sys + 19.81 cusr 4.37 csys = 24.27 CPU) Result: FAIL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 13881] Add ability to defined circulation desks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 May '20

21 May '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13881 --- Comment #64 from Josef Moravec <josef.moravec(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #63) > (In reply to Josef Moravec from comment #62) > > In a public library with three circulation desk, we had to set them as > > branches, as there was no other option in Koha... It's not big issue in > > relatively small public library. But when the library has more branches and > > more desks at each of them, the branches and desks combination could be more > > precise and semantically much more meaningful > > This is so interesting. I used to use the biggest public library in the > third biggest city (population 2.5 million) in Canada and it only had 1 area > for circulation. > > In Australia, I live in the biggest city (population 5 million) but all our > public libraries do seem to be small. Usually with 1 circulation area that > is mostly self checkout with 1 desk and 1 hold/reserve area. > > Having more desks seems like it would be more challenging from a management > perspective... but maybe it's necessary for bigger libraries in bigger > places? This is really interesting David! It looks like it does not depend on size of library but more on the attitude and customs of librariens ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13881] Add ability to defined circulation desks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 May '20

21 May '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13881 --- Comment #63 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Josef Moravec from comment #62) > In a public library with three circulation desk, we had to set them as > branches, as there was no other option in Koha... It's not big issue in > relatively small public library. But when the library has more branches and > more desks at each of them, the branches and desks combination could be more > precise and semantically much more meaningful This is so interesting. I used to use the biggest public library in the third biggest city (population 2.5 million) in Canada and it only had 1 area for circulation. In Australia, I live in the biggest city (population 5 million) but all our public libraries do seem to be small. Usually with 1 circulation area that is mostly self checkout with 1 desk and 1 hold/reserve area. Having more desks seems like it would be more challenging from a management perspective... but maybe it's necessary for bigger libraries in bigger places? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13881] Add ability to defined circulation desks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 May '20

21 May '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13881 --- Comment #62 from Josef Moravec <josef.moravec(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #61) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #60) > > I know that this is a common feature in at least one ILS widely used here in > > Germany in academic libraries. I could also imagine it being useful in > > public libraries with different desks for adult and children services. > > Oh right! Good one! Now that I think about it, I have gone to a public > library that had different circulation areas for adults and children. I > wonder if they treated them as separate branches or as separate desks in the > same branch. Interesting... In a public library with three circulation desk, we had to set them as branches, as there was no other option in Koha... It's not big issue in relatively small public library. But when the library has more branches and more desks at each of them, the branches and desks combination could be more precise and semantically much more meaningful -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13881] Add ability to defined circulation desks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 May '20

21 May '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13881 --- Comment #61 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #60) > I know that this is a common feature in at least one ILS widely used here in > Germany in academic libraries. I could also imagine it being useful in > public libraries with different desks for adult and children services. Oh right! Good one! Now that I think about it, I have gone to a public library that had different circulation areas for adults and children. I wonder if they treated them as separate branches or as separate desks in the same branch. Interesting... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13881] Add ability to defined circulation desks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 May '20

21 May '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13881 --- Comment #60 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- I know that this is a common feature in at least one ILS widely used here in Germany in academic libraries. I could also imagine it being useful in public libraries with different desks for adult and children services. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 25559] New: Hacked
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 May '20

21 May '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25559 Bug ID: 25559 Summary: Hacked Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Authentication Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: anonymouus404(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: dpavlin(a)rot13.org Created attachment 105165 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=105165&action=e… Ffg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 10662] Build OAI-PMH Harvesting Client
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 May '20

21 May '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10662 --- Comment #295 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- Now that I know the basics of Koha plugins and OpenAPI specs for API routes, I think the plugin progress will be quite quick. I am hoping that "koha-plugin-oaipmh-import" may actually be leveraged by many different OAI-PMH harvester tools. The standalone OAI-PMH harvester was required by Stockholm University Library, as they wanted a high performance interactive tool, but it might be overkill for many other libraries, which might just want to run a nightly cronjob. This plugin would allow any OAI-PMH harvester to feed records into Koha via the REST API. So I think this plugin is probably the most important component of the work really, as it will add the fundamental ability to ingest MARCXML records encapsulated within OAI-PMH records. With the "koha-plugin-oaipmh-import" plugin, people could use any number of existing OAI-PMH tools to create their own OAI-PMH harvesters to import records into Koha. But I'll still be working on creating an OAI-PMH harvester that meets the original stated needs of Stockholm University Library, as I still want them to be able to meet their goals. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0