April 2021 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 22407] New: OMNIBUS: Use DBIC relations to fetch related object rather than searching for the object
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22407 Bug ID: 22407 Summary: OMNIBUS: Use DBIC relations to fetch related object rather than searching for the object Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Example, instead of this: return Koha::Patrons->find( $self->guarantorid() ); We should do this: return Koha::Patron->_new_from_dbic($self->_result->guarantor); This allows us to use prefetch and perform a single query as opposed to multiple queries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 38

[Bug 26995] New: Drop column relationship from borrower tables
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26995 Bug ID: 26995 Summary: Drop column relationship from borrower tables Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Bug 14570 added a borrower_relationships table but it didn't remove the relationship column from the following tables: - deletedborrowers - borrowers - borrower_modifications It will need to be removed from many of the same places as "guarantorid" from Bug 14570 like: - C4/Auth_with_ldap - C4/SIP/ILS/Patron.pm - Possibly other places... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 36

[Bug 27463] New: OAI-PMH date handling in ListBase.pm
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Oct '22

12 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27463 Bug ID: 27463 Summary: OAI-PMH date handling in ListBase.pm Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 20.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: rudolfbyker(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently in Koha/OAI/Server/ListBase.pm two different criteria are used for querying dates and displaying dates. When displaying the "Last Modified" date, this is used: SELECT MAX(timestamp) FROM ( SELECT timestamp FROM biblio_metadata WHERE biblionumber = ? UNION SELECT timestamp FROM deleteditems WHERE biblionumber = ? UNION SELECT timestamp FROM items WHERE biblionumber = ? ) bi But when querying, only biblio_metadata.timestamp is used. This should be made consistent. We could use a query like this (using a join, but removing the need to do a separate query for each record, so it might actually be faster than what we have now): select bm.biblionumber, greatest(bm.timestamp, i.timestamp) as t from biblio_metadata bm inner join items i on bm.biblionumber=i.biblionumber having t >= '2020-07-14' and t <= '2020-07-15' limit 10; Furthermore, we should only use items.timestamp and deleteditems.timestamp when the user has the "include_items" option set in their OAI-PMH config. It does not make sense to query item timestamps if you are only sending data about the records, and not the items. Therefore, if "include_items" is disabled, we can do a simpler query: select biblionumber, timestamp from biblio_metadata where timestamp >= '2020-07-14' and timestamp <= '2020-07-15' limit 10; See full discussion on IRC: http://irc.koha-community.org/koha/2021-01-18#i_2324076 Definition of "datestamp" for reference: https://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html#Datestamp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 22

[Bug 19064] New: OAI-PMH Records appearing in OAI that can' t be found in OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Oct '22

12 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19064 Bug ID: 19064 Summary: OAI-PMH Records appearing in OAI that can't be found in OPAC Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: marrone.patricio(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hello, While harvesting Koha records from the OAI-PMH interface, I found a series of records that can't be accessed using the OPAC interface. That is, the harvester finds a record with an identifier, say http://example.com/cgi-bin/koha/oai.pl?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dc… that shows the complete record. Trying to link to the OPAC using the biblionumber in the last part of the identifier, say http://example.com/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=572 I get a 404 error. I have yet to confirm this, but this might be related to the records being hidden in the OPAC view being leaked into OAI. In that case, I would expect the record to have a deleted status in OAI so that in can be removed from the harvesting results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 20627] New: Prevent leakages of user permissions to api access tokens
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Oct '22

06 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20627 Bug ID: 20627 Summary: Prevent leakages of user permissions to api access tokens Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Authentication Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au, dpavlin(a)rot13.org, julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com, katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de, oleonard(a)myacpl.org, tomascohen(a)gmail.com Depends on: 20568 Blocks: 20612, 20624 Bug #20568 allow users to create API access tokens, but it always associates all a users permissions with that access token and additionally if that user comes to have more permissions down the line those additional permissions are automagically added to the access token as well. This is generally bad practice for access tokens as in general, they should be of a definite scope and any time additional privileges are required the client application should have to ask for them and receive a new token with the additional privileges assigned to it. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20568 [Bug 20568] Add API key management interface for patrons https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20612 [Bug 20612] Make OAuth2 use patron's client_id/secret pairs https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20624 [Bug 20624] Allow switching off the OAuth2 client credentials grant -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 19556] New: Added Content ISBN Does Not Match MARC 020
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Oct '22

04 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19556 Bug ID: 19556 Summary: Added Content ISBN Does Not Match MARC 020 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: jyorio(a)esilibrary.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This came to my attention with Novelist Select, but it does not appear to only relate to that. Here's what I'm seeing: Issue 1: A MARC record shows the 020 $a as "9780345813602 (hardcover) :" (minus quotes). The Novelist Select section of detail shows as blank. Novelist support reports seeing that they're getting a 9-digit ISBN 034581360. When I inspect the Novelist Select section, Koha appears to be passing 034581360X. <div data-novelist-novelistselect="034581360X"> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15772 mentions that Novelist can't interpret 10-digit ISBNs ending in X and this seems to be consistent with that. Issue 2 (less problematic from a patron perspective): A MARC record shows the 020 $a as "9781408810552" (minus quotes). The Novelist Select section shows the expected results. Novelist support reports getting ISBN 1408810557 This is a valid ISBN for the title, but not the one on the record. When I inspect the Novelist Select section of the details page, Koha appears to be passing 1408810557. <div data-novelist-novelistselect="1408810557"> In both cases above, ISBNs used for Novelist Select are the same as used for gbs-thumbnail-preview, however the cover image is returned in both cases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 19309] New: Add ReservesMaxPickUpDelay to the Circulation Matrix
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Oct '22

03 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19309 Bug ID: 19309 Summary: Add ReservesMaxPickUpDelay to the Circulation Matrix Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jzairo(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Some libraries would love to have the option to specify the ReservesMaxPickUpDelay by itemtype, rather than specify the ReservesMaxPickUpDelay for all items via the system preference. There are times when specific item types like popular or new items, DVD's or even Museum passes may not want to sit on a shelf for 7 days waiting for the patron to pick it up. Versus a non popular item that can wait for 7 days for the patron to pick the item up. Moving ReservesMaxPickUpDelay to the circ matrix would allow the library to choose the patron category and item type providing more flexibility for items waiting to be picked up by the patron. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 19318] New: Add ability to use custom file upload paths
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Oct '22

02 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19318 Bug ID: 19318 Summary: Add ability to use custom file upload paths Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Some libraries don't like the hard coded way uploaded files are all put in the same directory with the hash prefixing the file. We should allow uploaded files to retain their original name, and optionally specify a path to upload to I'm imagining we could accomplish this with something along these lines: 1) Add option on file upload page to not add file checksum to the uploaded filename, modify Koha::Upload 2) Modify Koha::Upload to support this option 3) Create new Authorised Value UPLOAD_PATH to define a set of upload paths 4) Add new 'upload path' option to file upload form as a pulldown of defined upload paths 5) Add new column 'file_path' to uploaded_files table 6) Modify Koha::Upload to support the automatic creation and use of custom file upload paths -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 48

[Bug 27051] New: opac-library.tt should include email
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 27 Sep '22

27 Sep '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27051 Bug ID: 27051 Summary: opac-library.tt should include email Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org opac-library.tt omits the branch email address. This information would be nice to show on the page as a 'mailto:' link. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 28131] New: Allow subscriptions to be linked to existing orders
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Sep '22

26 Sep '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28131 Bug ID: 28131 Summary: Allow subscriptions to be linked to existing orders Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org At the moment the workflow for subscription orders is a little "backwards": You have to create a subscription first, before you can create an order for it. It would be nice, if we could also do it the other way around: - Create an order for a serial record in your database, maybe using - When the first issue is delivered, use it to create your subscription and link it to the order This would not also help to streamline the acq process for new subscriptions, it would also be very handy to be able to link older orders to subscriptions that have been created before the feature was available in its current form. Or for migration data. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2