July 2021 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 18683] New: biblioitems.marcxml does not match MARC21slim.xsd
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Dec '21

30 Dec '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18683 Bug ID: 18683 Summary: biblioitems.marcxml does not match MARC21slim.xsd Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.05 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Database Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: mail(a)casi.pw QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I found the following record in a Koha installation that I manage, running on a Debian server. ---- <record xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"> <leader>[...]</leader> <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="c">[...]</subfield> <subfield code="d">[...]</subfield> </datafield> <controlfield tag="001">[...]</controlfield> [...] ---- This does not comply with the MARC21slim.xsd Schema definition, which says: <xsd:complexType name="recordType" id="record.ct"> <xsd:sequence minOccurs="0"> <xsd:element name="leader" type="leaderFieldType"/> <xsd:element name="controlfield" type="controlFieldType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> <xsd:element name="datafield" type="dataFieldType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xsd:sequence> <xsd:attribute name="type" type="recordTypeType" use="optional"/> <xsd:attribute name="id" type="idDataType" use="optional"/> </xsd:complexType> These malformed xml strings were created by Koha over the time. To localize the errors, I ran a SQL query on the database. > select timestamp from biblioitems where marcxml like "%<datafield tag=\"999\"%<controlfield%" order by timestamp gives 962 rows, since 24th of October 2016 Some of the marcxml fields even contain the field 999 a second time, at the end. > select timestamp from biblioitems where marcxml like "%<datafield tag=\"999\"%<controlfield%<datafield tag=\"999\"%" order by timestamp gives 509 rows, since 4th of January 2017 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 25971] New: Allow arbitrary database field as runtime parameter
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Dec '21

23 Dec '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25971 Bug ID: 25971 Summary: Allow arbitrary database field as runtime parameter Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Yet another runtime parameter idea, how about allowing a syntax like "SELECT * from accountlines WHERE debit_type_code like <<Pick a code|account_debit_types.code>>" So Koha then builds the parameter list based on a "select distinct code from account_debit_types" To make it even nicer, we could allow "<<Pick a code|account_debit_types.code:account_debit_types.description>>" so we use the code as our value but display the corresponding description. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 23793] New: Add an EmbedItems RecordProcessor filter for MARC::Record objects
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Dec '21

23 Dec '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23793 Bug ID: 23793 Summary: Add an EmbedItems RecordProcessor filter for MARC::Record objects Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This should help reduce the current overhead, and by using the features introduced by bug 22454, probably give a performance boost. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 37

[Bug 22544] New: Move C4:.NewsChannels to Koha namespace
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Dec '21

23 Dec '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22544 Bug ID: 22544 Summary: Move C4:.NewsChannels to Koha namespace Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: josef.moravec(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 263

[Bug 28481] New: Register details "Older transactions" search does not include the selected day in the "To" field in date range
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Dec '21

23 Dec '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28481 Bug ID: 28481 Summary: Register details "Older transactions" search does not include the selected day in the "To" field in date range Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When searching for older transactions, the To field should include the current day. Test Plan: 1) Sell an item 2) Cash up to make the sale historical 3) Search "Older transactions" with both dates being the current date, click "Display" to search 4) Note you get no results 5) Set "To" to tomorrow, click "Display" again 6) You should now see your transaction -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 23

[Bug 25946] New: borrowerRelationship can no longer be empty
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Dec '21

23 Dec '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25946 Bug ID: 25946 Summary: borrowerRelationship can no longer be empty Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: alex.arnaud(a)biblibre.com, andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com, david.roberts(a)ptfs-europe.com, gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, hc(a)interleaf.ie, jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, nugged(a)gmail.com, stalkernoid(a)gmail.com Depends on: 25322 Since Bug 25322 it is not possible to have an empty borrowerRelationship system preference. The empty relationship dropdown is treated as mandatory. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25322 [Bug 25322] Adding a guarantor with no relationship defaults to first available relationship name -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 34

[Bug 28279] New: mappings.yaml no longer in sync
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Dec '21

22 Dec '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28279 Bug ID: 28279 Summary: mappings.yaml no longer in sync Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Depends on: 19482, 27316, 20589, 25325 We are missing some changes in the mappings.yaml file: * missing staff_client/opac (bug 25325 and bug 20589) * missing mandatory (bug 19482) * sort (bug 27316) became a boolean field Which means export_elasticsearch_mappings.pl generates a file that differs a lot from the one we have in our codebase. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19482 [Bug 19482] Elasticsearch - prevent removal / editing of required indexes https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20589 [Bug 20589] Add field boosting and use elastic query fields parameter instead of deprecated _all https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25325 [Bug 25325] ElasticSearch mapping export lacks staff_client/opac fields https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27316 [Bug 27316] In mappings use yes/no for sortable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 19482] New: Elasticsearch - prevent removal / editing of required indexes
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Dec '21

22 Dec '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19482 Bug ID: 19482 Summary: Elasticsearch - prevent removal / editing of required indexes Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com Sorting options are currently hardcoded, in view of future z39 support with ES and other interfaces it is probably best to provide a base set of fields that are indexed and sortable. Using the base set of sorting this patchset will prevent editing/removal of these fields by default -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 106

[Bug 28177] New: Add date column and column configuration to uploads
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Dec '21

21 Dec '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28177 Bug ID: 28177 Summary: Add date column and column configuration to uploads Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 28175 I think it would be useful to add a date column to the table showing uploaded files. Adding column configuration at the same time will let us hide the column by default. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28175 [Bug 28175] Usability improvements to uploads page -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 22866] New: ItemsDeniedRenewal cannot be overriden
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '21

19 Dec '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22866 Bug ID: 22866 Summary: ItemsDeniedRenewal cannot be overriden Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- To Test: - Create a circ rule for patron category Y and itemtype X - Block renewal of itemtype X using ItemsDeniedRenewal - Confirm AllowRenewalLimitOverride is set to Allow - Check item of itemtype X out to patron of category Y - See that circulation.pl shows "renewal denied by syspref" - Click the checkbox for "Override renewal limit" - See that "renewal denied by syspref" message is replaced by a checkbox suggesting renewal will be allowed - Attempt to renew item - See error "Renew failed: item_denied_renewal" Ideally, one could override renewal blocks due to ItemsDeniedRenewal. Failing that, we should at least amend the confusing behavior in which is looks like you'll be able to override but then you receive an error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 22