September 2021 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 28800] New: Libabry list at /cgi-bin/koha/admin/branches.pl appears empty
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 Sep '21

08 Sep '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28800 Bug ID: 28800 Summary: Libabry list at /cgi-bin/koha/admin/branches.pl appears empty Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: egpetridis(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com I've noticed that the list of libraries comes up empty, although libraries have been defined. When trying to create a new library with the same code as an existing one, the expected error message appears, however one is left unable to manage the existing libarries. Video recording (54MB) available at https://emedgroupgr-my.sharepoint.com/:v:/g/personal/mpetridis_emedgroup_gr… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 26

[Bug 5920] Remove HTML from downloaded reports
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5920 George Williams (NEKLS) <george(a)nekls.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |george(a)nekls.org --- Comment #4 from George Williams (NEKLS) <george(a)nekls.org> --- I would want to be able to decide if the HTML was scrubbed or not. Sometimes I want the HTML output in the csv I download. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 23356] New: IndependentBranches: overdues list
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23356 Bug ID: 23356 Summary: IndependentBranches: overdues list Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: black23(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com If syssprefs "IndependentBranches" and "IndependentBranchesPatronModifications" is used, list of overdues (/cgi-bin/koha/circ/overdue.pl) should be limited only to current library as "Library of the patron". Now local staff can see anonymised but complete list overdues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 12599] IndependentBranches Holes
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12599 Caroline Cyr La Rose <caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=23356 CC| |caroline.cyr-la-rose@inlibr | |o.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 12599] IndependentBranches Holes
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12599 Caroline Cyr La Rose <caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=28967 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 18637] New: Handle Free Text vendor notes on Edifact Quotes
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18637 Bug ID: 18637 Summary: Handle Free Text vendor notes on Edifact Quotes Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org At present we store servicing instructions from the GIR segment of the quote in vendornote field of the order. We dont process the FTX segment (segment 25) of the quote. Some vendors (Ebsco) do use this for important information so we need to expand handling to handle Servicng instructions in GIR segment (both coded and free text) and vendor notes in FTX (both free text and coded ) and be able to include these in the generated orders -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 8367] How long is a hold waiting for pickup at a more granular level
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8367 --- Comment #161 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- I don't think this patch takes into account C4::Reserves::CancelExpiredReserves which gets called by the cronjob /usr/share/koha/bin/cronjobs/holds/cancel_expired_holds.pl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8367] How long is a hold waiting for pickup at a more granular level
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8367 --- Comment #160 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- Comment on attachment 118021 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=118021 Bug 8367: Add holds_pickup_period circulation rule Review of attachment 118021: --> (https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=836…) ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: koha-tmpl/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/en/modules/opac-reserve.tt @@ +272,5 @@ > </ul> > > + [% IF pickup_delays %] > + <p id="pickup_delay" style="display:none;">When your item is ready for pickup, you will have <span id="pickup_delay_days"></span> days to pick it up from this library.</p> > + [% END %] This doesn't display for any bibs but the first one if you have multiple bibs to place holds on. @@ +490,5 @@ > + var selected_branch = $("#branch_1").val(); > + [% FOREACH branchcode IN pickup_delays.keys %] > + var branchcode = "[% branchcode | html %]"; > + if ( branchcode == selected_branch ) { > + $("#pickup_delay_days").text([% pickup_delays.$branchcode | html %]); #pickup_delay_days can't work because it's not biblio-specific, so this will break if you're placing holds on more than 1 bib at a time. @@ +499,4 @@ > $(document).ready(function() { > + calculate_delay_days(); > + $("#pickup_delay").show(); > + $("#branch_1").change(function(){ This has the same selector problem because it's hard-coded to biblionumber 1. ::: opac/opac-reserve.pl @@ +694,5 @@ > + }); > + $hold_pickup_delay_by_branch{$branch->branchcode} = $rule->rule_value if ( $rule and $rule->rule_value ); > +} > + > +$template->param( pickup_delays => \%hold_pickup_delay_by_branch ); "pickup_delays" is a confusing name, and it looks like there's no consideration of ReservesMaxPickUpDelay here, even though Hold.pm seems to take it into consideration... which could lead to confusing displays. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8367] How long is a hold waiting for pickup at a more granular level
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8367 --- Comment #159 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- Comment on attachment 118021 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=118021 Bug 8367: Add holds_pickup_period circulation rule Review of attachment 118021: --> (https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=836…) ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: koha-tmpl/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/en/modules/opac-reserve.tt @@ +486,5 @@ > $(radios).first().attr("checked", "checked"); > } > > + function calculate_delay_days(){ > + var selected_branch = $("#branch_1").val(); This #branch_1 is wrong, as the HTML is populated using "branch_[% bibitemloo.biblionumber | html %]". The current code would only ever work for biblio 1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8367] How long is a hold waiting for pickup at a more granular level
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8367 --- Comment #158 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- I'm finding this test plan a bit difficult to follow. What does "7) Revert the waiting status" mean? -- Repeating Rhonda's mention that the pickup message doesn't change for "8) Re-place the hold on the biblio on the OPAC. Notice that when you change the pick up location, the number of days in the pickup message below the dropdown changes based on the circ rules." Not seeing any relevant Javascript errors. I'll look into that next... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0