July 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 29738] New: koha-run-backups can't use option --uploaded_files from koha-dump
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jan '24

23 Jan '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29738 Bug ID: 29738 Summary: koha-run-backups can't use option --uploaded_files from koha-dump Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: marion.durand(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz Depends on: 21903 Bug 21903 add tow options to koha-dump (--uploaded_files and --uploaded_temp_files) but these options can't be used from koha-run-backups. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21903 [Bug 21903] koha-dump be able to include koha-upload -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 26905] New: Purchase suggestion button hidden for users with suggestion permission but not acq permission
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jan '24

23 Jan '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26905 Bug ID: 26905 Summary: Purchase suggestion button hidden for users with suggestion permission but not acq permission Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 19.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: gormanp(a)parliament.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We have library staff who may need to submit purchase suggestions to our acquisitions team, but do not need access to the rest of the acquisitions module. We do not have purchase suggestions turned on on the OPAC. We have permissions set so that they can manage purchase suggestions, but do not have any acquisitions module permissions set. Unless I'm mistaken, the only route to access the purchase suggestion form through the staff client is through the acquisitions module, but if these users have no acquisitions permissions, they do not have the acquisitions page link available on the Koha homepage. Can I propose that a link to the purchase suggestion form be added somewhere else on the staff client homepage, so that users with this particular set of permissions can access the form without needing to have additional acquisitions permissions? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 24

[Bug 31132] New: Add button to clear the cataloguing authority plugin form
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Jan '24

22 Jan '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31132 Bug ID: 31132 Summary: Add button to clear the cataloguing authority plugin form Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: koha-training(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Add a button that will empty all of the search fields in the authority finder plugin when cataloguing biblios -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 24

[Bug 23012] New: Possibility to mark processing fee by default refund when item is found
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23012 Bug ID: 23012 Summary: Possibility to mark processing fee by default refund when item is found Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: patrick.robitaille(a)collecto.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hi, When you indicate a Processing fee and a replacement cost by default for a particular item type, these two fees are charge to users when an item is indicating as lost by the patron in koha. If you indicate that the item is now found, the replacement cost will be refund in the patron’s account if RefundLostOnReturnControl is activate. But, the processing fee is not refund in this situation. It would be nice to have the possibility to decide when the lost item is found that the processing fee by default will be refund ore not. It could be managed by a system preference or something like that. Test plan: -Activate WhenLostChargeReplacementFee -indicate a processing fee and a replacement cost by default for an item type. -check out an item with the same item type to a patron -Active RefundLostOnReturnControl -mark this item as lost by the patron in koha -see that the processing fee and the replacement cost are charge to the patron. -Mark the item as found by a check in -See that the replacement cost is refund and not the Processing fee. It could be a system preference in the same way that WhenLostChargeReplacementFee but for the processing fee. Regards, Patrick. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 67

[Bug 30934] New: Allow for this system preference NoRefundOnLostReturnedItemsAge to be library specific
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30934 Bug ID: 30934 Summary: Allow for this system preference NoRefundOnLostReturnedItemsAge to be library specific Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Currently, each branch can identify what their refund rules are in the circulation and fine rule matrix in the 'Default lost item fee refund on return policy'. Recently the system preference, NoRefundonLostReturnedItemAge has been introduced however as a global option. It would be more beneficial to multibranch library systems to determine this specific system preference by branch and not a system rule. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 21159] New: Blank item shelving location (952$c) on issue and return based on syspref values
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jan '24

17 Jan '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21159 Bug ID: 21159 Summary: Blank item shelving location (952$c) on issue and return based on syspref values Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: alexbuckley(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Items shelving location (952$c) is blanked when the item is issued (if the new syspref BlankShelvingLocationOnIssue is enabled) and returned (if the new syspref BlankShelvingLocationOnReturn is enabled). i.e. This patch will blank shelving location on circulation actions, it will utilise two system preferences rather than one so it can work however people want it to. The sysprefs will both be off by default. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 153

[Bug 26071] New: Allow to configure fields not to be copied when using "Edit as new (duplicate)" in cataloging
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Jan '24

15 Jan '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26071 Bug ID: 26071 Summary: Allow to configure fields not to be copied when using "Edit as new (duplicate)" in cataloging Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl When duplicating a record for example for cataloging a newer edition an exact duplicate of the record is created. In some cases it would be nice if you could define fields that should be emptied out when duplicating, similar to what we can do when duplicating subscriptions (SubscriptionDuplicateDroppedInput). The use case here would be to drop 001 when copying, so no duplicate IDs are added to the catalog. The field is marked mandatory so then the cataloger will be reminded to fill it in. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 18207] New: smart-rules.pl should validate that all branches / patron categories / item types are covered by circ rules.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18207 Bug ID: 18207 Summary: smart-rules.pl should validate that all branches / patron categories / item types are covered by circ rules. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff Client Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: barton(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com At present, It's possible to have combinations of branch / category / item type that are not covered by circulation rules. This may cause issues with circulation, holds and fines; we should require that all are covered. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 18054] New: Refreshing the screen for a confirmed checkout can cause odd results ( item checked out and waiting on hold)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Jan '24

11 Jan '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18054 Bug ID: 18054 Summary: Refreshing the screen for a confirmed checkout can cause odd results (item checked out and waiting on hold) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com To recreate: 1 - Place a hold and confirm it to mark waiting 2 - Checkout that item to another patron and override the hold 3 - Leave that window open 4 - In a new tab checkin the item and confirm the hold as waiting 5 - Refresh the tab from #3 - the item checksout but waiting hold does not revert -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 30889] New: Batch edited items shows wrong info in logs
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Jan '24

11 Jan '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30889 Bug ID: 30889 Summary: Batch edited items shows wrong info in logs Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: magnus(a)libriotech.no QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org To reproduce: - Make sure CataloguingLog is turned on - Edit some items with the "Batch item modification" tool, for example two items connected to the same record - Look at the "Cataloging" log - Note that Librarian = 0 and Interface = OPAC for those items you just edited -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 67