August 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 21847] New: OAI-PMH server should enforce correct syntax for identifiers (including OAI-PMH:archiveID)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Sep '23

13 Sep '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21847 Bug ID: 21847 Summary: OAI-PMH server should enforce correct syntax for identifiers (including OAI-PMH:archiveID) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org According to http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/guidelines-oai-identifier.htm, OAI-PMH identifier must follow this format: oai-identifier = scheme ":" namespace-identifier ":" local-identifier scheme = "oai" namespace-identifier = domainname-word "." domainname domainname = domainname-word [ "." domainname ] domainname-word = alpha *( alphanum | "-" ) local-identifier = 1*uric At the moment in Koha you can put whatever you like in OAI-PMH:archiveID and make all sorts of invalid identifiers. We should change this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 26596] New: koha-upgrade-schema should check version before calling updatedatabase.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Sep '23

13 Sep '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26596 Bug ID: 26596 Summary: koha-upgrade-schema should check version before calling updatedatabase.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org At the moment, koha-upgrade-schema indiscriminately runs updatedatabase.pl, regardless of whether or not the Koha instance actually requires a database upgrade. I've noted that running koha-upgrade-schema against a large number of instances (e.g. 50 instances) takes a couple of minutes. Jonathan has noted doing an upgrade will take 1.5 seconds, so 1.5 x 50 = would be 1.25 minutes. Jonathan and I agreed via email that koha-upgrade-schema should do a check similar to C4::Auth::_version_check but without using the ORM via C4::Context->preference() to avoid the overhead of loading the DBIC schema. In theory, koha-upgrade-schema should be able to spin through 50 instances in a fraction of a second, if none of them need database upgrades. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 18117] New: Convert browser alerts to modals
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Sep '23

12 Sep '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18117 Bug ID: 18117 Summary: Convert browser alerts to modals Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org With modals becoming more active in Koha, I think we need to move away from alert messages and stick with modals. Alert messages look different from browser to browser, and you have less/no control over the look and feel of the alert. Modals would allow for more enhancement, such as color and sound, if someone chose that. The big concern is consistency. We lack consistency between alerts and modals, and with alerts between browsers. I would proposed a stop on use of alert messages, and convert existing uses of alerts to modal. That's my opinion. Would like to hear others. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 30575] New: Returning an ILL item shouldn't just change the request status
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Sep '23

12 Sep '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30575 Bug ID: 30575 Summary: Returning an ILL item shouldn't just change the request status Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com In the context of more complex ILL backends, in which returning an item could imply, for example, notifying an external source it is just not enough to call $req->status('RET')->store We should be calling something like ->backend_return instead, as we do with other actions, and let the plugin handle it however they need to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 27849] New: Koha::Token may access undefined C4::Context->userenv
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Sep '23

12 Sep '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27849 Bug ID: 27849 Summary: Koha::Token may access undefined C4::Context->userenv Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 20.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mjr(a)software.coop QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The _add_default_csrf_params internal function accesses C4::Context->userenv without checking that it has been defined. I think not all of the potential callers of it declare that they require a defined userenv, so we should test and provide defaults for required values if it is not defined, to avoid some "Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference" HTTP 500 Internal Server Errors. Step to Reproduce: write some code that results in that function being used before a set_userenv call Actual Result: error logged, code exits Expected Result: code runs to completion Additional Information: I am not sure whether this is currently triggered by any released core koha code, or only a few plugins and mods. It looks to me like a bug waiting to happen, based on the documentation, which can be avoided simply. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 16514] New: Force scalar cotext where param assumes a list incorrectly in admin/edi scripts
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '23

11 Sep '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16514 Bug ID: 16514 Summary: Force scalar cotext where param assumes a list incorrectly in admin/edi scripts Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CGI's param method assumes a list context when lvalue not explicitly scalar. Force the correct context to avoid errors being logged -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 18158] New: Make SIP2 title identifier (AJ) customizable within sipconfig.xml
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '23

11 Sep '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18158 Bug ID: 18158 Summary: Make SIP2 title identifier (AJ) customizable within sipconfig.xml Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: SIP2 Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: barton(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com Feature Request: Add the ability to customize SIP2 title identifier (AJ) returned in Checkout Response (12) Checkin Response(10) Item Information Response (18) Hold Response (16) Renew Response (30) The formatting could be done by adding template toolkit code to sipconfig.xml, as was done in Bug 16755 - allow SIP2 field DA ( hold patron name ) to be customized. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 18161] New: Option to completely disable advance notice on loans with auto renewal
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '23

11 Sep '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18161 Bug ID: 18161 Summary: Option to completely disable advance notice on loans with auto renewal Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: stefan.berndtsson(a)ub.gu.se QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Some background. In our current library system, we use long loans (loans with a guaranteed minimum due date, but a much much longer hard due date), with a recall function. This is only in use for parts of the content. Koha does not support this, so we're looking at using auto renewal as a method to give a reasonable resemblance of long loans. We also want advance notices to be sent when the due date is about to arrive, but having an advance notice and then an automatic renewal shortly after will produce a multitude of notices that will be considered as faulty by the end user. The suggested solution to this is an option to simply disable advance notices for loans where auto renewal is active. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 18441] New: add primary, foreign keys to statistics table
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '23

11 Sep '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18441 Bug ID: 18441 Summary: add primary, foreign keys to statistics table Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: barton(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com I think that the primary key would be useful for Bug 9717 'localuse recorded for holds/transfers' -- we could record 'localuse' when the item is checked in, and then update the statistics record to 'holdcaptured' or 'transferred' if the check-in captures a hold or completes a branch transfer. The statistics table is *very* slow to join borrowers or items against, because borrowernumber and itemnumber are not indexed. It also caused a 12 hour run of updatedatabase on site that had a large statistics table, when running the upgrade that fixed bug 14598 (itemtype is not set on statistics by C4::Circulation::AddReturn). This occurred on the 16.06.00.039 update. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 18265] New: Followup to Buuug 17196. deletedbiblio_metadata is not used. biblioitemnumber was forgot.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '23

11 Sep '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18265 Bug ID: 18265 Summary: Followup to Buuug 17196. deletedbiblio_metadata is not used. biblioitemnumber was forgot. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: olli-antti.kivilahti(a)jns.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Exhibit 1: The MARCXML is lost when the biblio is deleted because the values in biblio_metadata-table from biblioitems-table are never moved to deletedbiblio_metadata-table. Previously the marcxml was preserved in the oldbiblioitems-table This is a challenge for gathering statistics For example item has been ordered, received, and removed from collection during the statistics period Information in marcxml is needed to accurately categorize the item Exhibit 2: [15:22:38] <kivilahtio> also. In Koha there once was a great idea that one biblio-entry can have multiple biblioitems [15:22:45] <kivilahtio> and the marcxml was tied to the biblioitems-table [15:23:11] <kivilahtio> this is a nice idea, but nobdy really cared for it and now biblionumber and biblioitemnumber are used interchangeably [15:23:22] <kivilahtio> except when they get out of sync during a data migration [15:23:41] <kivilahtio> then things start to work really interestingly [15:23:47] <kivilahtio> but the point is [15:23:57] <kivilahtio> biblio_metadata has a biblionumber-column [15:24:15] <kivilahtio> shouldn't it have a biblioitemnumber-column, just for old time's sake? In the biblioitems-table we had marcxml. primary keyed with biblioitemnumber. Now the marcxml is moved to biblio_metadata and the foreign key reference was simplified to biblionumber. This makes the existing FRBR-bug worse. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 27