September 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 29105] New: items responses do not respect effective_itemtype
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Sep '22

15 Sep '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29105 Bug ID: 29105 Summary: items responses do not respect effective_itemtype Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: REST API Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com The item objects we return from various items API routes do not respect the effective itype offerings. Example, itype is mapped directly from the item itype field to item_type.. it should check for effective itemtype and return the result of that. Similarly notforloan is mapped directly, but can depend on the effective itemtype. There are possibly others. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 37

[Bug 12758] Failure when loading or parsing XSLT stylesheets over HTTPS
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Sep '22

15 Sep '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12758 --- Comment #27 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl> --- Still giving this development a few days, but I will close it if no one is interested after all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 30641] New: Authority detail page shows wrong number of records using the authority
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '22

14 Sep '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30641 Bug ID: 30641 Summary: Authority detail page shows wrong number of records using the authority Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl You can see the wrong behaviour in a clean sample database with http://localhost:8081/cgi-bin/koha/authorities/detail.pl?authid=133 To test: * Test plan assumes you are using the ktd sample data * Staff interface > authorities * Search for agile * Verfiy the result list shows used by 2 records and this is correct (authority is linked to both of them) * Switch to authority detail page * Verify it shows 3 records use this authority * Verify this is incorrect (the second record is not linked to the authority) I suspect that the detail page doesn't do an exact/phrase search opposed to the other pages, finding also records with similar authority numbers? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 30658] New: (Bug 29496 follow-up) CheckMandatorySubfields don't work properly with select field in serials-edit.tt for Supplemental issue
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '22

14 Sep '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30658 Bug ID: 30658 Summary: (Bug 29496 follow-up) CheckMandatorySubfields don't work properly with select field in serials-edit.tt for Supplemental issue Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: januszop(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CheckMandatorySubfields use the class "input_marceditor" but in file serials-edit.tt this class is not set for select input in Supplemental issue form. In consequence if a select field is set as mandatory, it is detected as missing even if it is filed and so you can't submit the form and receive the new supplemantal issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 31186] New: Search result numbering in OPAC got suppressed
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '22

14 Sep '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31186 Bug ID: 31186 Summary: Search result numbering in OPAC got suppressed Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Trivial fix forthcoming -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 30268] New: When creating an order from a staged file, mandatory item subfields that are empty do not block form submission
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '22

14 Sep '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30268 Bug ID: 30268 Summary: When creating an order from a staged file, mandatory item subfields that are empty do not block form submission Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com Reporter: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Steps to reproduce: 1. Make sure you have mandatory item subfields in the MARC bibliographic framework used in acquisitions ("ACQ" if it exists, the default framework otherwise). 2. Use the "Stage MARC records for import" tool to upload a file. Do not import the bibliographic records. 3. Create a new acquisition basket ("Create items when:" must be set to "placing an order") and add a new order from a staged file 4. Select the file you just uploaded 5. In the "Items information" tab, make sure at least one mandatory subfield is empty 6. Try to submit the form. If there are errors about other mandatory fields (like the fund for instance), fix those errors and resubmit. You will be able to submit the form without filling the mandatory item subfields, but that should not be possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 7660] Enhanced messaging preferences are not set when creating a child patron from the adult
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '22

14 Sep '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7660 Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor(a)tuxayo.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|Pushed to oldstable |RESOLVED CC| |victor(a)tuxayo.net --- Comment #20 from Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor(a)tuxayo.net> --- Not backported to oldoldstable (21.05.x). Feel free to ask if it's needed. Nothing to document, marking resolved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 31020] New: PassItemMarcToXSLT only applies on results pages
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '22

14 Sep '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31020 Bug ID: 31020 Summary: PassItemMarcToXSLT only applies on results pages Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Bug 28373 added system preference PassItemMarcToXSLT is referenced is all XSLT system preferences. But it only applies on results pages. The only use in perl code is in C4::Search : > $marcrecord->delete_fields( @fields ) unless C4::Context->preference('PassItemMarcToXSLT'); I've tested by adding in all XSLT files : <strong>ITEMS <xsl:value-of select="count(marc:datafield[@tag=952])"/> </strong> Number of items only appears in OPAC and staff interface results pages. In fact only search pages get MARC record from search engine, in which items datas have been embedded for indexing. In other pages MARC record does not embed items datas. PS : Maybe it will be good to have separate preferences for OPAC and staff interface. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 16

[Bug 31163] New: Sort cashup history so that newest entries are first
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '22

14 Sep '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31163 Bug ID: 31163 Summary: Sort cashup history so that newest entries are first Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 20.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com When looking at the cashup history table, it would be helpful if the newest entries showed up first. Currently it sorts the oldest entries first. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 20439] New: SMS provider sorting
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '22

14 Sep '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20439 Bug ID: 20439 Summary: SMS provider sorting Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: george(a)nekls.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com On intranet memberentry.pl and on OPAC opac-messaging.pl the SMS provider drop-down is sorted in the order the provider was added rather than alphabetically by provider name - making it difficult for library staff and for borrowers to find providers not added in alphabetical order. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 27