October 2008 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 1942] Managing Suggestions: Accepted By Empty
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 10 Oct '08

10 Oct '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1942 ------- Comment #4 from oleonard(a)myacpl.org 2008-10-10 08:08 ------- This appears to have been fixed. Nicole, can you test? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2626] XSLTResultsDisplay - display icons for printed music are incorrect
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 10 Oct '08

10 Oct '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2626 oleonard(a)myacpl.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Comment #1 from oleonard(a)myacpl.org 2008-10-10 07:06 ------- Josh and I chatted about this yesterday and he said that the problem is that OCLC and LOC have different guidelines for this issue. The XSL stylesheet is correct according to LOC's standard. Based on that information, I'm going to mark this "invalid." I'd say the best solution is an enhancement to create another stylesheet that fits the OCLC standard along with a mechanism to designate which stylesheet to use. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2620] OPAC authority detail
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 10 Oct '08

10 Oct '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2620 ------- Comment #6 from henridamien(a)koha-fr.org 2008-10-10 06:49 ------- owen : Good point about facets. + Could be good to add also related Terms AND rejected terms to Hierarchies display. But then it would be just a new display of the whole heading. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2622] Permissions: edit_notice_status_triggers -- not working
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 09 Oct '08

09 Oct '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2622 rch(a)liblime.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |PATCH-Sent ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1926] Error on bulk marc import from file (staged)
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 09 Oct '08

09 Oct '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1926 ------- Comment #4 from costas.magnuse(a)gmail.com 2008-10-09 14:00 ------- What was your global admin setting you had to change in order to correct the problem? ============== I uploaded, staged and imported a file with records that contain amongst other MANY titles the word "Ευρωαπαϊκή" (it means European) as a title of a book. After that, any catalog search that contains a word that was in that file gives me the error page: Error: Can't call method "as_usmarc" on an undefined value at /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Search.pm line 2133. I undid the import but nothing happened. The BIG problem is that it contained many many widely used words like "economics" or "environment" or "statistics". So now that I search for these words I get the same error page. Could you please provide me with a work around in order to remove this staged file please? ######## Way to reproduce: ######## Download: http://costis.name/eu2.marc : this file contains various entries amongst them there is a book written by McCann, and in a later line another book that contains the string "Ευρωπαϊκ" in its title, written by "Μούσης". 1. I have a clean installation of koha and import eu2.marc 2. I search for McCann, and I get the result I should 3. I search for Μούσης and I get the error (Error: Can't call method "as_usmarc" on an undefined value at /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Search.pm line 2133.) 4. I search for McCann, and I get the same Error!... Isn't it weird that I did not get it in step 2? How could i resolve this? ######## Unsuccessful solution: ######## In the database, I removed from the import_batches table the entries of the import_batch_id 13,14,15 (these correspond to the files that contained the entries with the diacritics and are like the eu2.marc file), but the problem persists. What else should I do ? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2076] Resolve differences in DB schema for a new vs. upgraded database
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 09 Oct '08

09 Oct '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2076 rch(a)liblime.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |major ------- Comment #13 from rch(a)liblime.com 2008-10-09 12:50 ------- Adding to this for a new vs upgraded from 3.0x database, or 3.0 prerelease db: $DBversion = "3.00.00.031" adds some sysprefs. INSERT INTO `systempreferences` (variable,value,explanation,options,type) VALUES('maxItemsInSearchResults',20,'Specify the maximum number of items to display for each result on a page of results',NULL,'free') This one isn't in kohastructure. It would be really useful to add to the test suite a test for update database: install the 3.0 release database, run updatedatabase on it, then compare with the current kohastructure. Minimally, maxItemsInSearchResults needs to be added, but there may be others. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2666] OPACDisplayItypes not in default database definition
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 09 Oct '08

09 Oct '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2666 ------- Comment #1 from rch(a)liblime.com 2008-10-09 12:45 ------- I don't see this syspref in updatedatabase. noItemTypeImages does exist in both. I recall that we wanted to change that, to avoid the confusion of double negatives, but I don't see any evidence that it was done. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2620] OPAC authority detail
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 09 Oct '08

09 Oct '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2620 ------- Comment #5 from oleonard(a)myacpl.org 2008-10-09 10:25 ------- Good point about records having many fathers (we would say parents). Since I don't have personal experience with this kind of authority structure I don't know what kind of data is to be expected. As for the question of whether this belongs on the left, I would compare the hierarchy to the search results' facets display rather than to biblio views. That's why I suggested the left-hand column. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2667] XSLT Subjects in OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 09 Oct '08

09 Oct '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2667 ------- Comment #3 from nicole.engard(a)liblime.com 2008-10-09 08:52 ------- Well, that's no good either. Good find. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 2667] XSLT Subjects in OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 09 Oct '08

09 Oct '08

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2667 ------- Comment #2 from oleonard(a)myacpl.org 2008-10-09 08:50 ------- That doesn't seem to be the only problem with subject display. In the normal template the subject might appear like this: Physical measurements --Juvenile literature. Where the first phrase links to "opac-search.pl?q=su:Physical measurements" and the second links to "opac-search.pl?q=su:Physical measurements and su:Juvenile literature." In the XSLT version, the link looks like this: Physical measurements Juvenile literature ...and links to "opac-search.pl?q=su:Physical measurements" ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0