June 2014 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 813] OPAC virtual shelves should store comments
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=813 Nicole C. Engard <nengard(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nengard(a)gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Nicole C. Engard <nengard(a)gmail.com> --- *** Bug 10594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10594] New: ability to annotate lists
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10594 Bug ID: 10594 Summary: ability to annotate lists Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: nengard(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be great if there was a way to annotate lists - kind of like a subject guide versus just a saved list of titles. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 8560] New: renewing lost items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8560 Priority: P5 - low Change sponsored?: --- Bug ID: 8560 CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Summary: renewing lost items Severity: major Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: nengard(a)gmail.com Hardware: All Status: NEW Version: master Component: Circulation Product: Koha I got this report from a library: When items age to long overdue lost, they assess a fee equivalent to the replacement price of the item. That makes sense. When those items are checked in, the fee is removed and the titles no longer display as checked out. The overdue does remain in the patron's history under fines. That also makes sense. However, if we renew one of those items, it assigns a new due date, but does not remove the fee or the long overdue lost designation. And, if we take payment on the item, it balances out the fee, reducing the amount due accordingly, but the title continues to display in the list of items out as long overdue lost. The result of this is that our staff members continue to mention these overdue items to the patron even after they've been taken care of. Other categories of lost - those that are manually set - remove the title from the list of items out. Renewing an item should also remove the fees and the long overdue designation. And paying for the item should remove it from items out and show it only in payment history. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 2901] Unable to hide RLIN subfields in a framework
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2901 David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook(a)prosentient.com.au --- Comment #1 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- I noticed this recently as well...still seems to be an issue. You can collapse it...but it's impossible to hide it in the editor... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 1289] Bulk/global edit for MARC frameworks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=1289 David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook(a)prosentient.com.au See Also| |http://bugs.koha-community. | |org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi? | |id=12477 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 3841] Should have Default ACQ Framework
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3841 David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook(a)prosentient.com.au See Also| |http://bugs.koha-community. | |org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi? | |id=12477 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11330] New: Inconsistent field/subfield descriptions on MARC21 bibliographic frameworks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11330 Bug ID: 11330 Summary: Inconsistent field/subfield descriptions on MARC21 bibliographic frameworks Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: bgkriegel(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org There are many inconsistencies on field/subfield descriptions on MARC21 bibliographic frameworks. That fact makes very hard to translate frameworks accurately using an automated procedure -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 16

[Bug 9826] New: Missing fields in MARC21 authority framework
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9826 Bug ID: 9826 Summary: Missing fields in MARC21 authority framework Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: bgkriegel(a)gmail.com Reporter: bgkriegel(a)gmail.com CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl The default Authority frameworks for MARC21 are missing many tags. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 10488] New: New MARC21 authority tags and subfields should be propagated to non-default frameworks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10488 Bug ID: 10488 Summary: New MARC21 authority tags and subfields should be propagated to non-default frameworks Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl The patch for bug 9826 updated the default MARC21 authority frameworks with new tags and subfields, but new fields were added only to the default framework. Appropriate tags should be added to the non-default frameworks, e.g., PERSO_NAME, TOPIC_TERM, etc. A possible restructuring of authorities_normal_marc21.sql that might make it easier to maintain would be to have it populate each non-default framework by first making a copy of the default tags and subfields, then removing the tags that are not relevant to the authority type. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 19

[Bug 12475] New: GetMemberDetails should return undef if borrowernumber doesn't exist
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12475 Bug ID: 12475 Summary: GetMemberDetails should return undef if borrowernumber doesn't exist Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com If you pass an invalid borrowernumber (ie a borrowernumber that doesn't exist in the borrowers table) to GetMemberDetails, you get the following information in the hashref it returns: 'authflags' => undef, 'flags' => {}, 'amountoutstanding' => '0', 'showname' => undef It should just return 'undef' so you know that the borrower you're looking for doesn't exist in the database. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0