February 2016 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 11081] Port Koha::Contrib::Tamil indexer into Koha code base
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '16

29 Feb '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11081 --- Comment #28 from Brendan Gallagher <brendan(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #27) > (In reply to Chris Cormack from comment #26) > > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #20) > > > After the discussion on bug 11190, I thought we all agreed that Moo must be > > > used, instead of Moose. > > > > That was my understanding > > Same here. hmm... Should I revert this until it's not using the Moose? Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15481] Remove dead code in datatables.js
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '16

29 Feb '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15481 --- Comment #13 from Brendan Gallagher <brendan(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #12) > (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #8) > > Should we revert this one? > > No. Bug 15916 solved the issue. So this patch was fine after all :) Awesome :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15009] Planning dropdown button in aqbudget can have empty line
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '16

29 Feb '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15009 --- Comment #10 from Charles Farmer <charles.farmer(a)inlibro.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #9) > Note that a AV could be "" or 0 :-/ Could you be more specific about what that entails? Is it a good thing, or a bad thing? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15532] Add ability to allow only items whose home/holding branch matches the hold's pickup branch to fill a given hold
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '16

29 Feb '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15532 Koha Team Lyon 3 <koha(a)univ-lyon3.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |koha(a)univ-lyon3.fr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15534] Add the ability to prevent a patron from placing a hold on a record with available items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '16

29 Feb '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15534 --- Comment #12 from Koha Team Lyon 3 <koha(a)univ-lyon3.fr> --- I'm really interested by this bug and I can try to give you my opinion and my feedback. >From what I've read here and in the other bugs, I think that the proposition of the syspref allowonshelfholds with 3 option sounds good. I agree that we can keep the current behaviour that allows to put holds if only one item at least is borrowed (but I must say that patrons in my library don't really understand that their hold are not put on available items but only on the borrowed one). I'm looking forward to the new option to be implemented because it's really the behaviour that we expect : that patrons can put holds only if all items that can be hold are checked out. It isn't specified here but if there's items with different item types and that some of them are not defined as "holdable" in issuing rules and are on shelves but that all the "holdable" one are checked out, we should have the possibility to place an hold. And it should be the same if we have items from different branches : one that allows holds and the other not. If there's items available in the branch that doesn't allow holds, but that all the items from the branch that allows holds are checked out, patrons should be able to place a hold. I hope that I'm clear in my explanations... Sonia BOUIS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15009] Planning dropdown button in aqbudget can have empty line
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '16

29 Feb '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15009 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- Note that a AV could be "" or 0 :-/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15009] Planning dropdown button in aqbudget can have empty line
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '16

29 Feb '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15009 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-c | |ommunity.org --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- You will need to provide tests for this change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11904] Proposal for a uniform way to send messages to user interface
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '16

29 Feb '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11904 --- Comment #45 from Julian Maurice <julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Owen Leonard from comment #44) > #2 is more difficult because it's a matter of opinion. You like message > boxes that have a 100% width. I don't. Because we disagree we have to get > more opinions. Moving the issue to a new bug will help keep the discussions > focused. I don't care about the width of boxes, as long as it is the same for all types of boxes. I can remove CSS changes from these patches and use existing style instead if this is what you meant for #1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11081] Port Koha::Contrib::Tamil indexer into Koha code base
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '16

29 Feb '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11081 --- Comment #27 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Chris Cormack from comment #26) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #20) > > After the discussion on bug 11190, I thought we all agreed that Moo must be > > used, instead of Moose. > > That was my understanding Same here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15585] Move C4::Passwordrecovery to Koha::Patron::Password::Reset
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '16

29 Feb '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15585 --- Comment #6 from Blou <philippe.blouin(a)inlibro.com> --- Well, just a ping to remind everyone how important the followup was to #8753... It's here, waiting, alone, probably crying... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0