April 2016 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 15350] DBIx::Class Startup speed
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15350 Jacek Ablewicz <abl(a)biblos.pk.edu.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=16309 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15342] Performance 3.22 - Omnibus
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15342 Jacek Ablewicz <abl(a)biblos.pk.edu.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |16309 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 [Bug 16309] opac-image.pl makes cpu 100% -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10459] borrowers should have a timestamp
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10459 --- Comment #27 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl> --- Thanks for reviving this. The reason I left this pending however, is probably as valid as then. If you call the field timestamp, we will have clashes in SQL joins here and there in the codebase where another table also has the same field timestamp. Especially think about the SELECT * statements with timestamp in another clause as well. So to prevent the ambiguous column name errors, we need to track these cases, test.. and hope we found them all. An older alternative to add bortimestamp, introducing a new name, did not meet much approval. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 12598] New misc/import_borrowers.pl command line tool
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12598 --- Comment #69 from Florent Mara <florent.mara(a)gmail.com> --- Many thanks for the feedback. If Chris has the time next Tuesday, I will kindly ask his advice on the next step for my work. It might be good enough to be in a patch but want to make sure. Other than rebasing, tests exposed some defects which I have fixed while refactoring. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11592] opac detail scripts do not respect MARC tag visibility
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11592 M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #50486|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #106 from M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> --- Comment on attachment 50486 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=50486 isbd after db and patch Confirmed and patched. This led to a GetISBDView refactor. It also led to the discovery of leakage in the carts and lists. Lists are mostly dealt with. Carts partially, but may not be noticeable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11592] opac detail scripts do not respect MARC tag visibility
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11592 M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #50485|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #105 from M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> --- Comment on attachment 50485 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=50485 marc virew after db and patch Confirmed and patched. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11592] opac detail scripts do not respect MARC tag visibility
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11592 M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #50484|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #104 from M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> --- Comment on attachment 50484 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=50484 Normal view after patch and db update confirmed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11592] opac detail scripts do not respect MARC tag visibility
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11592 --- Comment #103 from M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> --- Created attachment 50489 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=50489&action=ed… Bug 11592: MARCView and ISBD followup There are still some leaks, but it is not as a result of the filter, but rather a result of poorly written template files. Bug fixing template files is beyond the scope of this set of patches. Test plan to follow later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13597] Amazon 'no image' element needs a 'no-image' class, in the staff client
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13597 --- Comment #2 from Mason James <mtj(a)kohaaloha.com> --- Created attachment 50488 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=50488&action=ed… before/after pic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 5761] system preference to control "No cover image available" message
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5761 --- Comment #12 from Mason James <mtj(a)kohaaloha.com> --- (In reply to Mason James from comment #11) > (In reply to Mason James from comment #9) > > (In reply to David Cook from comment #8) > > > Mason: Can you explain why Owen's CSS doesn't work for you? > > > > > > I've been using the CSS mentioned by Owen for a few years now and I haven't > > > noticed any difficulties. Does Google Jackets use a different HTML element > > > and/or class? > > > > for intranet search results, the amazon 'no image' element is not a > > 'no-image' class, so the following CSS will not work... > > hmm, the no-image jscript code in the intranet, does not add the 'no-image' > class > - unlike the OPAC version i've added a patch for this here... https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13597 i think Owens CSS solution might work, after this patch is added :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0