August 2016 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 13528] Ability to search on the different isbn variations
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Aug '16

14 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13528 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imingchan(a)yahoo.com.au --- Comment #10 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- *** Bug 16595 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 16595] New: Concurrent search between ISBN-10 and ISBN-13 in staff client and OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Aug '16

14 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16595 Bug ID: 16595 Summary: Concurrent search between ISBN-10 and ISBN-13 in staff client and OPAC Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: imingchan(a)yahoo.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Ability to concurrent search between ISBN-10 and ISBN-13. This will eliminate the need to conduct separate searches between ISBN-10 and ISBN-13. When a catalogue record only has ISBN-10, it can be found using an ISBN-13 search. On the other hand, a catalogue record only has ISBN-13 can be found using an ISBN-10 search. For example: ISBN 174336704X stored in the catalogue record can be found by using ISBN search of 9781743367049, or vice versa. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 6759] Use a different account type for account renewals than for new accounts
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Aug '16

14 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6759 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|navya.vp(a)osslabs.biz |koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-commun | |ity.org --- Comment #2 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Resetting to default - please take the bug if you intend to work on it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 6759] Use a different account type for account renewals than for new accounts
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Aug '16

14 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6759 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de Summary|Use Accounttype 'R' for |Use a different account |renewal related fees |type for account renewals | |than for new accounts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10848] Allow configuration of mandatory/ required fields on the suggestion form in OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Aug '16

14 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10848 --- Comment #56 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Created attachment 54432 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=54432&action=ed… [PASSED QA] Bug 10848 - [QA Followup] Add missing branch option and fix pattern for copyrightdate - HTML5 input pattern for copyrightdate was not taking into an account the database field type, which is smallint(5) - added title="..." for the year field so the acceptable date format should be displayed as a hint/tooltip in the browser - added an missing option for configuring branch/library as mandatory Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83(a)web.de> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10848] Allow configuration of mandatory/ required fields on the suggestion form in OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Aug '16

14 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10848 --- Comment #55 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Created attachment 54431 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=54431&action=ed… [PASSED QA] Bug 10848 - Allow configuration of mandatory/required fields on the suggestion form in OPAC - part 2 Add 'OPACSuggestionMandatoryFields' syspref definition plus an atomic DB update for the new preference. Signed-off-by: barbara johnson <barbara.johnson(a)bedfordtx.gov> Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83(a)web.de> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10848] Allow configuration of mandatory/ required fields on the suggestion form in OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Aug '16

14 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10848 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #54083|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #54084|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #54356|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #54 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Created attachment 54430 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=54430&action=ed… [PASSED QA] Bug 10848 - Allow configuration of mandatory/required fields on the suggestion form in OPAC This patch adds a configuration option which allows to define which fields should be mandatory for a patron purchase suggestion form in OPAC. Test plan: 1/ Apply patch. 2/ Play with the new OPACSuggestionMandatoryFields system preference (select some fields as manadatory, select all, deselect all, try to submit some suggestions with mandatory fields filled and/or not filled etc.) to ensure that required fields (and only required fields) are enforced in the browser to be filled. 3/ With all options deselected, 'Title' field should still be mandatory (by default). Signed-off-by: barbara johnson <barbara.johnson(a)bedfordtx.gov> Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83(a)web.de> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10848] Allow configuration of mandatory/ required fields on the suggestion form in OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Aug '16

14 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10848 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Passed QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10848] Allow configuration of mandatory/ required fields on the suggestion form in OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Aug '16

14 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10848 --- Comment #53 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- There are some things not super-perfect here, but I think no blockers. Making the library mandatory doesn't hurt - we can think about having it empty or to 'all libraries' separately. The new format check keeps you from submitting something that cannot be stored in the database - improving the GUI is also something we can do separately. Maybe we could just display a hint behind the field in a grey font as we do in other places. Passing QA. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10848] Allow configuration of mandatory/ required fields on the suggestion form in OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Aug '16

14 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10848 --- Comment #52 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Maybe something for a different bug: What about renaming copyright date to publication year? I think this could make the format more obvious too. Also... is collection title meant to be series? We have this showing up in some places in Koha and it seems related to UNIMARC - but not sure what it is supposed to be in MARC21. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0