August 2016 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 16105] New: Cache::Memory is loaded even if memcache is used
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Mar '25

18 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16105 Bug ID: 16105 Summary: Cache::Memory is loaded even if memcache is used Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 11998, 16104 Cache::Memory is loaded and Koha::Cache::_initialize_memory is called even if a memcached cache has been correctly initialize, it does not make sense. It should only be initialize if needed. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11998 [Bug 11998] Syspref caching issues https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16104 [Bug 16104] Warnings "used only once: possible typo" should be removed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 16104] New: Warnings "used only once: possible typo" should be removed
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Mar '25

18 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16104 Bug ID: 16104 Summary: Warnings "used only once: possible typo" should be removed Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Since bug 11998, the following warnings are raised: Name "Tie::Hash::FIELDS" used only once: possible typo at /usr/share/perl/5.22/fields.pm line 135. Name "Cache::RemovalStrategy::LRU::FIELDS" used only once: possible typo at /usr/share/perl/5.22/fields.pm line 135. Name "Cache::RemovalStrategy::FIELDS" used only once: possible typo at /usr/share/perl/5.22/fields.pm line 135. It comes from the Koha::Cache 103 if ( can_load( modules => { 'Cache::Memory' => undef } ) ) { -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 38

[Bug 16196] New: Acquisitions Module Not Showing Subtotals
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Mar '25

17 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16196 Bug ID: 16196 Summary: Acquisitions Module Not Showing Subtotals Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: amy(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Partner reports that when receiving books in the Acquisitions module, subtotals are not identifying which fund they are for. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 17173] New: Quick edit a subfield in frameworks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17173 Bug ID: 17173 Summary: Quick edit a subfield in frameworks Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com There are too many click to jump to the edit form of a specific subfield. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 16629] New: Fields available for printing are inconsistent between label layouts and SpineLablFormat system preference
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Feb '25

03 Feb '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16629 Bug ID: 16629 Summary: Fields available for printing are inconsistent between label layouts and SpineLablFormat system preference Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Label/patron card printing Assignee: cnighswonger(a)foundations.edu Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In label layouts all marc fields are available, however, when setting quick spine fields in the system preferences you can only use columns from the db tables. It would be nice to have access to record fields here as well -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 16826] New: Add API routes for getting item availability and holdability
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Jan '25

16 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16826 Bug ID: 16826 Summary: Add API routes for getting item availability and holdability Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: larit(a)student.uef.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Add API routes for getting item availability and holdability. Holdability check requires a target borrower (either user himself or borrowernumber). I'm thinking of following endpoints: GET /api/v1/items/{itemnumber}/availability GET /api/v1/items/{itemnumber}/holdability For myself GET /api/v1/items/{itemnumber}/holdability?borrowernumber=X For X Terms: - availability: Does not require login or permissions. Makes a simple check if item is in a valid state for holdings. In other words, check "notforloan", "onloan", "itemlost", "withdrawn", "damaged". - holdability: Requires login and also catalogue permission if the request is made for another borrowernumber than myself. Item is holdable if it is available and if it satisfies IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest and CanItemBeReserved in C4::Reserves + (also debarments and fines?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 83

[Bug 15855] New: Disabling multiple submission on search form
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Jan '25

16 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15855 Bug ID: 15855 Summary: Disabling multiple submission on search form Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.18 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: arthur.suzuki(a)univ-lyon3.fr QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 48203 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=48203&action=ed… Extract from koha-opac-access_log Some impatient users tends to click several times on the “Go” button of the search form on OPAC. Probably in a desperate hope that this will speed up the whole process. However the result is quite opposite, as Zebra is then queried multiple times which increases the server cpu load, until it reach 100% and cause Denial of Service (boooh…) We had the idea of disabling the “searchsubmit” button upon first click. This is done by adding onclick=”this.disabled=true;this.form.submit();return true;” after “id=searchsubmit” in masthead.inc. It is also possible to solve this issue by adding the following section to opacuser.js: $(document).ready(function() { $('#searchform').submit(function() { $('#searchsubmit').prop('disabled',true).text('searching...'); }); }); Thanks to Frederic Demians and Olivier Crouzet for their help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 16734] New: getLanguages() in opac-search.pl should be called only if needed
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 Jan '25

08 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16734 Bug ID: 16734 Summary: getLanguages() in opac-search.pl should be called only if needed Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: abl(a)biblos.pk.edu.pl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org There is no need to always call getLanguages() in opac/opac-search.pl (especially not if it's an actual search), it's output is used only in opac-advsearch.tt template. This patch moves it into 'if ( ... $template_type eq 'advsearch' )' block. Speed gain is rather moderate (40 - 80 msec, if the mysql server is no too busy, and the results are already in query cache), but it eliminates a lot of small DBI calls, making a further profiling of OPAC searches a bit easier. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 15725] New: Merge permission
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Dec '24

25 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15725 Bug ID: 15725 Summary: Merge permission Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: hbraum(a)nekls.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl It would be nice if Koha had a permission to limit access to the merge records option (Merge selected button) on the addbooks.pl search results page and the virtualshelves/shelves.pl page (lists). This is especially important in a consortial catalog environment where many people have cataloging permissions, but most probably shouldn't have the ability to merge records. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 17138] New: UpdateFine() modyfies existing fine records even when there is no need
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17138 Bug ID: 17138 Summary: UpdateFine() modyfies existing fine records even when there is no need Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: abl(a)biblos.pk.edu.pl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com In C4/Overdues.pm: 574: # we're updating an existing fine. Only modify if amount changed 577: if ( $data->{'amount'} != $amount ) { for some numbers (e.g. 5.60) the comparison in line 577 fails ($data->{'amount'} is decimal(28,6) i.e. a string, and $amount may be a floating point number with no exact binary representation). E.g. when the fine amounts are multiple of 0.20, it fails for the 33.3% of the amounts (on average). Depending on the fine charging settings, this may trigger unnecessary database writes (and a lot of them). If 'Fine Charging Interval' is 1 day, this has very little practical consequences (misc/cronjobs/fines.pl script is usually run once per day, and all fines need an increase anyway). But if the charging interval is longer, e.g. 7 days, in a given day amount changes only for the 1/7 of the fines (again, on average), and over 60% of the database writes would be redundant. To reproduce: 1) run misc/cronjobs/fines.pl 2) add warn "AMOUNT ".$data->{'amount'}." vs $amount"; below line 577 in C4/Overdues.pm 3) run misc/cronjobs/fines.pl again 4) you'll see some warnings like 'AMOUNT 5.600000 vs 5.6' or: dump accountlines table after step 1), run the script 2nd time, dump the table again and compare the contents - some of the records would have a different timestamp. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 38