September 2016 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 13321] Tax and prices calculation need to be fixed
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Sep '16

05 Sep '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13321 Julian Maurice <julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13321] Tax and prices calculation need to be fixed
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Sep '16

05 Sep '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13321 --- Comment #68 from Julian Maurice <julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com> --- Created attachment 55168 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=55168&action=ed… Bug 13321: Recalculate tax_value for partially received orders Test plan: 1. Create an order with at least 2 items 2. Receive only 1 item 3. Check that the tax value of the received order line is correct on the parcel and invoice pages 4. Check that the tax value of the original order line is correct (on the basket page for example) 5. Cancel the receipt 6. Check that the tax value of the original order line is correct -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13321] Tax and prices calculation need to be fixed
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Sep '16

05 Sep '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13321 --- Comment #67 from Julian Maurice <julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com> --- The problem is tax value is not recalculated when order lines are split. I'll write a patch to fix that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14757] Allow the use of Template Toolkit syntax for slips and notices
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Sep '16

05 Sep '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14757 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |17246 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17246 [Bug 17246] GetPreparedLetter should not allow multiple FK defined in arrayref -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14060] Remove readonly on date inputs
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Sep '16

05 Sep '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14060 --- Comment #52 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #50) > This all works very well, I can't enter any errors, I can press enter with > an invalid date, but it reads it as empty so that seems okay. > > My one complaint would be that if you click into the datepicker, and decide > not to enter a date you should not receive the warning. That is, closing on > an empty value should not warn Heh, good catch! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14060] Remove readonly on date inputs
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Sep '16

05 Sep '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14060 --- Comment #51 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- Created attachment 55165 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=55165&action=ed… Bug 14060: Consider an empty string as a valid date -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14060] Remove readonly on date inputs
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Sep '16

05 Sep '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14060 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Signed Off -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 7045] Default-value substitution inconsistent
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Sep '16

05 Sep '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7045 Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli(a)cineca.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z.tajoli(a)cineca.it --- Comment #33 from Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli(a)cineca.it> --- ATTENTION The update in updatedatabase.pl for this patch (DBRev 16.06.00.016) is wrong. Instesad of update marc_subfield_structure set defaultvalue=REPLACE(defaultvalue, 'YYYY', '<<YYYY>>') where defaultvalue like "%YYYY%" and defaultvalue not like "%<<YYYY>>%"; update marc_subfield_structure set defaultvalue=REPLACE(defaultvalue, 'MM', '<<MM>>') where defaultvalue like "%MM%" and defaultvalue not like "%<<MM>>%"; update marc_subfield_structure set defaultvalue=REPLACE(defaultvalue, 'DD', '<<DD>>') where defaultvalue like "%DD%" and defaultvalue not like "%<<DD>>%"; update marc_subfield_structure set defaultvalue=REPLACE(defaultvalue, 'user', '<<USER>>') where defaultvalue like "%user%" and defaultvalue not like "%<<USER>>%"; I see: INSERT IGNORE INTO systempreferences (`variable`, `value`, `options`, `explanation`, `type`) VALUES ('OPACSuggestionMandatoryFields','title','','Define the mandatory fields for a patron purchase suggestions made via OPAC.','multiple'); It is the same of DBRev 16.06.00.017. An error of RM ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 13249] AutoCreateAuthorities doesn' t work for fields different from 700
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Sep '16

05 Sep '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13249 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de --- Comment #2 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- I think what is meant is the authority-linking-plugin possibly? I am not sure how this works for UNIMARC. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11592] opac detail scripts do not respect MARC tag visibility
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Sep '16

05 Sep '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11592 --- Comment #143 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Mark, are you going to sign off on Tomas' follow-ups so this can move on? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0