May 2019 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 17721] New: Do we need utf8_bin collation on tagsubfield?
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Apr '20

19 Apr '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17721 Bug ID: 17721 Summary: Do we need utf8_bin collation on tagsubfield? Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Comes from report 17676. This discussion should be on a new report. === Comment11 > Indeed we want to keep tagsubfield a utf8_bin (to allow lowercase and uppercase of the same letter for subfields). Could you provide an example where we want to do that? Is that MARC conform? And if so(!), why would you need utf8_bin to do so? You can still insert them, only finding the right a or A would be harder. It seems to me that we should remove this strange exception, and make sure that all tagsubfields are saved lowercase. Should not be too hard. Can MARC::Record handle subfields a and A btw? But this discussion should be on a new report. > if ( $table[1] !~ /COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci/ and $table[1] !~ /COLLATE=utf8mb4_unicode_ci/ ) { #catches utf8mb4 collated tables This is only 99,9% safe (as you are probably aware of). If you find one column in unicode_ci, the table might still be something else (theoretically). Perhaps someone added a custom column with collation? Since you only change the default here, why not always do it? Replacing X with X will not be a problem.. Comment12&13 (Katrin) It's not strictly MARC conform, but we use this a lot and I have talked to others using it as well. Take the 952 field as the example - all subfield codes are taken. Using upper case letters works fantastically now and allows you to store and index data that we got no other sensible spot for. We got it all working perfectly, why break this feature without need? Ah, and I think I have encountered upper case in German MARC - just can't find a documentation right now. === Even if we do not change it at all, it would be worth writing somewhere why we do not. (And where we can still find it later.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 20722] New: Searching only for an ITEMTYPECAT itemtype is impossible
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Apr '20

19 Apr '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20722 Bug ID: 20722 Summary: Searching only for an ITEMTYPECAT itemtype is impossible Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Searching for only the itemtype usually works, but not for itemtypes that are actually ITEMTYPECAT categories grouping several itemtypes together. In this case you will need to add a second search criteria for the search to work. Only searching for the group will return you to the advanced search page. To test: - Create an entry for the ITEMTYPECAT authorised value category. Make sure to fill in the OPAC description. - Go to administration > itemtypes and add the new category to 2 item types. - Go to the OPAC and check that the advanced search shows your new itemtype group instead of the individual itemtypes. - Check the checkbox and Search. - You will be returned to the advanced search page without error. - Search for another ungrouped itemtype, it will return correct search results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 17531] New: Search categories for itemtypes broken
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Apr '20

19 Apr '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17531 Bug ID: 17531 Summary: Search categories for itemtypes broken Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The feature introduced with bug 10937 appears to be broken on current master. You can add a search category and the display on the advanced search page is correct, but the search won't return any results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 17362] New: Patron import overwrite adds debarments
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Apr '20

19 Apr '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17362 Bug ID: 17362 Summary: Patron import overwrite adds debarments Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: mirko(a)abunchofthings.net QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When importing patrons via tools, if overwrite is chosen and there is a debarred column with 1, the debarments add up with every import. Might be related to bug 15010. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 17000] New: Patron Modification log access permission
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Apr '20

19 Apr '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17000 Bug ID: 17000 Summary: Patron Modification log access permission Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff Client Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: ed.veal(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com You can only see patron modification log when viewing a patron record if you have one or both of the “parameters Manage Koha system settings (Administration panel)” permissions. This is good information for the circulation staff to be able to access. Ed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 16970] New: In OPAC Search results, <Limit to current available items > hides a record if some of its items are available and others unavailable
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Apr '20

19 Apr '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16970 Bug ID: 16970 Summary: In OPAC Search results, <Limit to current available items> hides a record if some of its items are available and others unavailable Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: PC OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: thysia(a)live.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This is a misleading bug for users on OPAC, as they can think that a book is not currently available when it has still available items. If we cannot solve this bug, it would be better not to give this feature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 16503] New: Label creator: grouping fields with quotes does not work in layout creator
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Apr '20

19 Apr '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16503 Bug ID: 16503 Summary: Label creator: grouping fields with quotes does not work in layout creator Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Label/patron card printing Assignee: cnighswonger(a)foundations.edu Reporter: barton(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The description for "Data field" under label-edit-layout.pl shows "Enter a comma separated list of fields to print. You may include any Koha field or MARC subfield. See online help for advanced options ex: barcode, itemcallnumber, title, "050a 050b", 300a Fields homebranch_description, holdingbranch_description, ccode_description, location_description and permanent_location_description show description instead of code." This seems to indicate that grouping fields using quotes, non-comma separated, *should* work: Given an item with the following data: title: Juggling for the complete klutz / author: Cassidy, John. itemcallnumber: JNF 793.8 Cas Using the data fields "title author", itemcallnumber Should yield a CSV export this: "Juggling for the complete klutz / Cassidy, John.","JNF 793.8 Cas" Instead I get this: ,"JNF 793.8 Cas" To replicate: 1/ Create a record using the title, author and itemcallnumber above. 2/ Go to tools > label creator 3/ Add a batch containing the created item 4/ Add a new layout. Click the list fields radio button, and add the fields title, author, itemcallnumber 5/ Export the batch as CSV using the new layout. The resulting file will look like this: "Juggling for the complete klutz /","Cassidy, John.","JNF 793.8 Cas" 6/ Edit the layout, change the field list to "title author", itemcallnumber 7/ Export the batch again, the new CSV file will read ,"JNF 793.8 Cas" The bug was replicated under version 3.23. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 22999] New: Switch two-column templates to Bootstrap grid: Circulation
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Apr '20

17 Apr '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22999 Bug ID: 22999 Summary: Switch two-column templates to Bootstrap grid: Circulation Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 20654 Target Milestone: --- The circulation (check out) template should be updated to use the Bootstrap grid. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20654 [Bug 20654] Omnibus: Update two-column templates to use Bootstrap grid -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 19

[Bug 21708] New: Editing a record moves field 999 to first in the marcxml
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Apr '20

16 Apr '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21708 Bug ID: 21708 Summary: Editing a record moves field 999 to first in the marcxml Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pasi.kallinen(a)joensuu.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl 1) Import or create a new record. 2) Examine the marcxml of that record in the database - the fields are in the correct numerical order. 3) Edit the record - no need to change any data, just save it. 4) Examine the marcxml in the database - the 999 field is now right after leader and before 001. This is due to TransformHtmlToMarc in C4/Biblio.pm, specifically the $param eq 'biblionumber' case, which pushes the param in the array first, and then the sub uses $record->append_field() Perhaps the array should be sorted by field tag before appending the fields? AFAIK, this doesn't really show up anywhere in Koha, but if you ever edit the records via a script using MARC::Record, new fields cannot be easily inserted into correct position. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 38

[Bug 17143] New: Popup Notification for decreaseloanhighholds preference
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Apr '20

16 Apr '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17143 Bug ID: 17143 Summary: Popup Notification for decreaseloanhighholds preference Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jzairo(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com If you have an item that meets the holds requirement by the decreaseloanhighholds preference, but doesn’t get a decrease in the actual checkout period; you still get a popup notification that the high demand feature is being used and the loan period will be decreased. The notification shouldn't populate if the decreased loan period matches or is higher than the original loan period. The current behavior in the system looks at the the number of holds and doesn't take the loan periods with an equal value into consideration when enforcing the preference. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5