May 2019 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 21302] New: Link in 780/785 should search for $t in title and $a in author
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Mar '24

05 Mar '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21302 Bug ID: 21302 Summary: Link in 780/785 should search for $t in title and $a in author Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When a record has a 780 and/or 785 field with both $a and $t, the link should search for the value in $a in the author index and the value in $t in the title index, combined with AND. Right now, it searches for both in the title index. Steps to reproduce: 1- If its not already in your cataloguing framework, add 780 $a and $t and 785 $a and $t (check the "Editor" box) 2- Search for a record and edit it 3- Add an author name in 780 $a and 785 $a 4- Add a title in 780 $t and 785 $t 5- Make sure both indicators for both fields are 0, so it should look like 780 00 $aAuthor1 $tTitle1 785 00 $aAuthor2 $tTitle2 6- Save the record and view it in "normal" view 7- Click the link created for Author1 Title 1 -> the search is ti,phr:Author1 Title1, but it should be au,phr:Author1 and ti,phr:Title1 8- Repeat step 7 with Author2 Title2, same result If possible, it would be great if all values were searched in their rightful index with "and" in between to narrow the search. 76X - 78X $a = author (same as 1XX or 7XX) $d = publisher, publication date or place (same as 260 $a, $b, $c or 264 $a, $b, $c) $e = language (same as 008/35-37) $f = publication place (same as 008/15-17) $k = series (same as 4XX or 8XX) $o = identifier number (same as 0XX) $p = title (same as 210) $s = uniform title (same as 240 or 243) $t = title (same as 245 or 130) $u = report number (same as 027) $x = issn (same as 022) $y = coden (same as 030) $z = isbn (same as 020) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 21631] New: No warning when placing a hold with current location/pick-up location combination forbidden by Transport cost matrix
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Mar '24

05 Mar '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21631 Bug ID: 21631 Summary: No warning when placing a hold with current location/pick-up location combination forbidden by Transport cost matrix Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com I might be missing a setting here, holds are so complicated and have so many settings... Plus this is in a multi-branch system situation... I was expecting to see an error or a warning for holds with a combination of current location and pick-up location that is forbidden by transport cost matrix. To reproduce: 0) Make sure you have several branches in your system (at least 3, I'll call them A, B and C) 1) Go to Administration > Global system preferences and activate UseTransportCostMatrix 2) Go to Administration > Transport cost matrix 3) Click on the cell for the combination 'From A to B', uncheck 'Disable' and enter 0 4) Leave combination 'From A to C' disabled 5) In the catalog, search for an item which is currently at library A and currently available (you can use item search for this) 6) Place a hold for this item and change the pick-up location to library B 7) Run misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl 8) Go to Circulation > Holds queue 9) Choose library A, item should be in the queue 10) In the catalog, search for an item which is currently at library A and currently available (you can use item search for this) 11) Place a hold for this item and change the pick-up location to library C (there is no warning, everything seems fine) 12) Run misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl 13) Go to Circulation > Holds queue 14) Choose library A, 2nd item is not in the queue Am I missing something? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 18138] New: Use MARC modification template when adding/ updating bibliographic records
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '24

29 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18138 Bug ID: 18138 Summary: Use MARC modification template when adding/updating bibliographic records Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: stefan.berndtsson(a)ub.gu.se QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl When importing records, MARC modification templates can be used to silently remove unwanted tags among other thing. The same thing could be useful when adding/updating bibliographic records from within Koha. I therefor propose an addition of a SysPref to set a default template to use in AddBiblio and ModBiblio before TransformMarcToKoha is called. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 117

[Bug 22446] New: Koha/Patron/Categories.t is failing on March 1st (2019 only?)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '24

29 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22446 Bug ID: 22446 Summary: Koha/Patron/Categories.t is failing on March 1st (2019 only?) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com Target Milestone: --- koha_1 | # Failed test 'With enrolmentperiod defined and a date given in parameter, ->get_expiry_date should take this date + enrolmentperiod' koha_1 | # at t/db_dependent/Koha/Patron/Categories.t line 80. koha_1 | # got: '-1' koha_1 | # expected: '0' koha_1 | # Looks like you failed 1 test of 5. koha_1 | koha_1 | # Failed test 'get_expiry_date' koha_1 | # at t/db_dependent/Koha/Patron/Categories.t line 86. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 22340] New: Elasticsearch - sorting fields should have a fallback mechanism
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Feb '24

19 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22340 Bug ID: 22340 Summary: Elasticsearch - sorting fields should have a fallback mechanism Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com Target Milestone: --- As an example 264 and 260 should be sortable for publisher Some records will have one, some will have both, it should eb configurable which to use and that we should not leave the sort field empty if one field is missing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 17975] New: TT syntax for notices - Prove that HOLD_SLIP is compatible
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Feb '24

16 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17975 Bug ID: 17975 Summary: TT syntax for notices - Prove that HOLD_SLIP is compatible Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 21

[Bug 21858] New: RFC: Notices and slips documentation
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Feb '24

15 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21858 Bug ID: 21858 Summary: RFC: Notices and slips documentation Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Developer documentation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: barton(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Koha doesn't currently have a single point of truth for documentation of notices and slips, which has lead to a proliferation of markup syntaxes, especially in regard to repeating detail, e.g. DUEDGST/PREDUEDGST: <<items.content>> ODUE* <<items.content>> or <item> </item> CHECKOUT/CHECKIN/RENEWAL ---- Detail here ---- These have been documented in https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Customising_Notices_and_Slips#Notice_M… , but this has gotten out of date as new notices get added in each version of Koha. Work to be done: Add Koha/Notices.pod which will document the following for each notice in the Letter table: * Letter Code * Source file where the notice is populated * Logic that triggers the notice * Detail syntax (if any) * Available data (tables and substitutions) * Message transport restrictions The output from this pod should be used as the basis for the Koha user documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 17967] New: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Feb '24

15 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Bug ID: 17967 Summary: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 17427] New: Replace CGI::Session with Data::Session
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Feb '24

15 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17427 Bug ID: 17427 Summary: Replace CGI::Session with Data::Session Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CGI::Session is not maintained for ages and seems quite buggy. It would be the culprit of random logout problems. Another issue is the following crazy code in CGI::Session::Driver::DBI sub DESTROY { my $self = shift; unless ( defined $self->{Handle} && $self->{Handle} -> ping ) { $self->set_error(__PACKAGE__ . '::DESTROY(). Database handle has gone away'); return; } unless ( $self->{Handle}->{AutoCommit} ) { $self->{Handle}->commit; } if ( $self->{_disconnect} ) { $self->{Handle}->disconnect; } } If AutoCommit is off, it will commit anyway... It causes some tests to fail (api) if SessionStorage is set to MySQL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 131

[Bug 17120] New: Specify number of rows per page in report and initial run
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Feb '24

14 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17120 Bug ID: 17120 Summary: Specify number of rows per page in report and initial run Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I think we could enhance reports so that the &limit= parameter could be initially set with the report settings and stored in a field in the table. I also think we could have the drop down available on the parameters page when running the report the first time. If you have a report you know that would run well and could be completely shown with more rows, why not have the option to initially set it differently than the default? The LIMIT command in SQL is okay and works for actually limiting the total number of results, but does weird things if you specify a number larger than 20. The results still span multiple pages, plus it doesn't give you options while running like this would. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 9