November 2020 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 12656] Send a notice to patrons when their hold was cancelled because it was not picked up
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12656 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- Pushed to master for 20.11, thanks to everybody involved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 12656] Send a notice to patrons when their hold was cancelled because it was not picked up
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12656 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version(s)| |20.11.00 released in| | Status|Passed QA |Pushed to master -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 12533] Improve authority search result display
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12533 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- Pushed to master for 20.11, thanks to everybody involved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 12533] Improve authority search result display
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12533 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version(s)| |20.11.00 released in| | Status|Passed QA |Pushed to master -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11460] Correction to default itemcallnumber system preference in UNIMARC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11460 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- Pushed to master for 20.11, thanks to everybody involved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11460] Correction to default itemcallnumber system preference in UNIMARC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11460 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Passed QA |Pushed to master Version(s)| |20.11.00 released in| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14866] Make high holds work with different item types and number of open days
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14866 --- Comment #34 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #33) > Yes, but we insert the rule during the update process. > > If we create the rule with the value in the syspref I think we could remove > the it. Is it worth it? Hm ist could work, but I haven't fully worked out the structure yet, but I think there is a functional difference with your suggestion and the current implementation: The * * * rule shoudl only be applied if there is no rule that is more specific. So, when you have: itemtype a - patroncategory b ... high holds value left empty. Current suggestion: - the pref value will be used as a fallback. Your suggestion: - I am not sure. I believe that it won't fall back but use the "empty" and that it will need to have some meaning, like "0" or "inactive"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 5920] Remove HTML from downloaded reports
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5920 Séverine Queune <severine.queune(a)bulac.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |severine.queune(a)bulac.fr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14866] Make high holds work with different item types and number of open days
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14866 --- Comment #33 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- Yes, but we insert the rule during the update process. If we create the rule with the value in the syspref I think we could remove the it. Is it worth it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14866] Make high holds work with different item types and number of open days
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14866 --- Comment #32 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- It's a fallback when no other value is set in the circulation conditions: + if ( defined($rule) && $rule->rule_value ne '' ){ + # overrides decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration syspref ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0