March 2021 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 23357] New: overdue_notices.pl can send library doubled emails for patrons with no email/sms if both transports enabled
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Sep '24

09 Sep '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23357 Bug ID: 23357 Summary: overdue_notices.pl can send library doubled emails for patrons with no email/sms if both transports enabled Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz In overdue_notices.pl we have a check to avoid sending a patron two notices if they are missing an email address and an sms number, however, we don't apply this check to generating the notice content and so send the library the same info twice -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 19

[Bug 23497] New: Notices defaulting to print
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Sep '24

09 Sep '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23497 Bug ID: 23497 Summary: Notices defaulting to print Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Why is it that Koha defaults to printing? Shouldn't the default be no notification, and we have to select which notices are printed, if any? Right now, if a patron doesn't have an e-mail selected as the form of notification, the notice defaults to print. I would like to suggest that a print column be added, and if nothing is checked, nothing is generated. Maybe in the notices tab for the patron a place holder could be made saying that patron opted for no notification, or something like that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 23558] New: REST API: Get an ILL request
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Sep '24

06 Sep '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23558 Bug ID: 23558 Summary: REST API: Get an ILL request Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: black23(a)gmail.com Method GET /ill_requests/{ill_request_id} https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Illrequests_endpoint_RFC -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 22440] New: ILL API response objects inconsistent with other endpoints
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Sep '24

06 Sep '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22440 Bug ID: 22440 Summary: ILL API response objects inconsistent with other endpoints Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew.isherwood(a)ptfs-europe.com Target Milestone: --- The response object returned from the /api/vi/illrequest GET route isn't consistent with response objects supplied by other routes, such as the patrons route. We have an RFC for this route here: https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Illrequests_endpoint_RFC Josef has made some initial recommendations on what the properties should be named to make them consistent with other routes. We could do with expanding this RFC to make it complete, including a spec on how object embedding should be done since, to date, this is the only route that does this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 66

[Bug 23557] New: REST API: Add ILL request
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Sep '24

06 Sep '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23557 Bug ID: 23557 Summary: REST API: Add ILL request Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: black23(a)gmail.com Method POST /ill_requests https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Illrequests_endpoint_RFC -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 26715] New: Make Z39.50 modal moveable in the Advanced Cataloging Editor
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Sep '24

06 Sep '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26715 Bug ID: 26715 Summary: Make Z39.50 modal moveable in the Advanced Cataloging Editor Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 19.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: barbara.johnson(a)bedfordtx.gov QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl It would be helpful to be able to move the Z39.50 modal around the screen when performing a Z39.50 search while editing a record in the Advanced Cataloging Editor (editor.p) Sometimes after doing the Z39.50 search you need to see something in the original bib record and it ends up being obscured behind the modal causing you to have to close the modal in order to view the specific part of the bib record you needed to consult. Then you have to re-execute the Z39.50 search. It would be a great timesaver if you could move the modal around the screen to view all parts of the bib record behind it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 27677] New: Configure facets differently for OPAC and Staff Client
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Sep '24

06 Sep '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27677 Bug ID: 27677 Summary: Configure facets differently for OPAC and Staff Client Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: severine.queune(a)bulac.fr Search logics and needs are different if you are a user or a librarian. It could be great if we could define two different orders for the facets for the OPAC and the staff client, and if we could hide/show a facet in an interface but not the other one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 26717] New: Allow specifying where to insert new subfields in MARC Modification Templates
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Sep '24

05 Sep '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26717 Bug ID: 26717 Summary: Allow specifying where to insert new subfields in MARC Modification Templates Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: phil(a)chetcolibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Bug 24480 comment 9 points out that the current system of adding subfields at the end of the field isn't always what someone will want. However, since many fields have a particular non-alphabetic order for subfields (in a personal name, subfield q (the fuller form of name) follows a, before dates in d) or a semantic meaning to the order of subfields (subject fields) or a variable order based on how you use them (if I used 521 I might be tempted to use $bFoo:$aBar to get a display of "Target Audience Setting Authority: Goats" rather than an unclear "Goats Target Audience Setting Authority"), fixing this will require figuring out what methods of specifying location can and should be supported, writing UI to specify them, and either adding those methods to MARC::Field (which only does "at the end") or just making "Add a subfield" actually be "Create a new field by copying the existing subfields of an existing field with one added and then delete the existing field" in the backend. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 26477] New: Emaillibrarianwhenholdisplace may be change to specify email as per library choice
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Sep '24

04 Sep '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26477 Bug ID: 26477 Summary: Emaillibrarianwhenholdisplace may be change to specify email as per library choice Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 20.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mishravk79(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Hello Emaillibrarianwhenholdisplace may be more helpful if we make it customisable as per choice of the library. It will help library to specify the email of librarian who is dealing with Hold related services in the library. Thanking You -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 23984] New: Local cover 'thumbnail' size is bigger than 'imagefile' size in biblioimages table
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Sep '24

04 Sep '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23984 Bug ID: 23984 Summary: Local cover 'thumbnail' size is bigger than 'imagefile' size in biblioimages table Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: arouss1980(a)gmail.com, jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org, lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com, magnus(a)libriotech.no, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, nick(a)bywatersolutions.com, tomascohen(a)gmail.com Depends on: 21987 Blocks: 23963 The original resolution to this issue, bug 21987, caused a nasty regression and has since been reverted. Opening this bug so we may pursue a new route to goal. +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #21987 +++ We use local cover images in our setup, and also resize the covers we scan to a width of 160px before uploading and attaching them to a Koha bibliographic record (we upload one cover per biblio). While using phpMyAdmin to view the contents of the 'biblioimages' table (relevant screenshot here: https://imgur.com/a/cSEVLBI) we noticed that the size of the BLOBs for the 'thumbnail' column was in some cases twice as big as that of the 'imagefile' column. In fact, this happens for more than 50% of uploaded covers as you can see from the output of the SQL queries below: mysql> SELECT COUNT( * ) AS count FROM biblioimages WHERE LENGTH( thumbnail ) > ( LENGTH( imagefile ) * 2 ) ; +-------+ | count | +-------+ | 1356 | +-------+ mysql> SELECT COUNT( * ) AS count, SUM( LENGTH( imagefile ) ) AS images_size, SUM( LENGTH( thumbnail ) ) AS thumbnails_size FROM biblioimages ; +-------+-------------+-----------------+ | count | images_size | thumbnails_size | +-------+-------------+-----------------+ | 2347 | 68323933 | 115839686 | +-------+-------------+-----------------+ It would appear that for each 160px-wide JPG with 24-bit depth that we have uploaded, the 'imagefile' column has been populated with an PNG of 8-bit depth with the same dimensions as the uploaded file, whereas the 'thumbnail' column contains a 24-bit PNG image with a width reduced to 140 pixels. I've tracked down the creation of resized 24-bit PNGs to this code: https://github.com/Koha-Community/Koha/blob/master/C4/Images.pm#L182-L183 Do thumbnails for covers need to be true colour (24-bit) images? Also, why is it that _scale_image() returns an image of 8-bit depth if the source image's dimensions are less than 600x800? (i.e. when no resizing is performed) Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21987 [Bug 21987] Local cover 'thumbnail' size is bigger than 'imagefile' size in biblioimages table https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23963 [Bug 23963] Visible reduction in image quality -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6