May 2021 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 28378] New: Elasticsearch - Add 264c to default copydate mappings (MARC21)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Aug '21

16 Aug '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28378 Bug ID: 28378 Summary: Elasticsearch - Add 264c to default copydate mappings (MARC21) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com In the current default index mappings, copydate only includes 260$c. I think it should also include 264$c which is used as much as, if not more than, 260$c. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 28339] New: Elasticsearch - Add 8XX to default title-series index mappings (MARC21)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Aug '21

16 Aug '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28339 Bug ID: 28339 Summary: Elasticsearch - Add 8XX to default title-series index mappings (MARC21) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com Right now, the default mappings for title-series in MARC21 only include 440$a and 490$a. I propose we add 8XX (800$t, 810$t, 811$t, 830$a) which are series added entries. I don't think it is good practice to have a record with only a 8XX and no 490, but I've seen it happen enough that it has been a problem in our searches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 26761] New: Use aria-disabled attribute in OPAC cart for disabled links
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Aug '21

16 Aug '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26761 Bug ID: 26761 Summary: Use aria-disabled attribute in OPAC cart for disabled links Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 8712 There is no "disabled" property for the <a> tag, so we have to have a way in addition to color to express that a link is disabled. I think using the "aria-disabled" attribute would be helpful. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8712 [Bug 8712] We should use WAI-ARIA guidelines to help with accessibility -OMNIBUS bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 27858] New: Make Koha::Patron::Attribute->store raise an exception on invalid type/code
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Aug '21

13 Aug '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27858 Bug ID: 27858 Summary: Make Koha::Patron::Attribute->store raise an exception on invalid type/code Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Somehow, it goes through, and fails with "{UNKNOWN}: Can't call method "repeatable" on an undefined value" on the $self->_check_repeatable call. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 32

[Bug 28220] New: Exception not caught when importing patrons with invalid attribute type
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Aug '21

13 Aug '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28220 Bug ID: 28220 Summary: Exception not caught when importing patrons with invalid attribute type Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Keywords: rel_21_05_candidate Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Tried to use an invalid attribute type. type=test1 at /usr/share/perl5/Exception/Class/Base.pm line 88 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 51

[Bug 27833] New: Koha::Exceptions::Patron::Attribute::* should have parameters
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Aug '21

13 Aug '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27833 Bug ID: 27833 Summary: Koha::Exceptions::Patron::Attribute::* should have parameters Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When one of them is thrown, they should carry the failing code and value. This way we can provide better feedback on the UI (or the API). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 26

[Bug 28480] New: GET /patrons missing q parameters on the spec
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Aug '21

12 Aug '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28480 Bug ID: 28480 Summary: GET /patrons missing q parameters on the spec Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: REST API Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 26

[Bug 28418] New: Number the MARC modification templates
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Aug '21

12 Aug '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28418 Bug ID: 28418 Summary: Number the MARC modification templates Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: barbara.johnson(a)bedfordtx.gov QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We've been working on creating lots of MARC modification templates. It would be great if each template was auto-assigned an identifying number so that when I'm communicating to another staff member I can give them the template number to use. Rather than saying look for the template named 'Copy 800|t and 800|v to 490|a and 490|v' I could say use template 21. This would make it easier for another staff member to find and increase accuracy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 27600] New: renew_all shouldn't perform a password check
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Aug '21

12 Aug '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27600 Bug ID: 27600 Summary: renew_all shouldn't perform a password check Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: SIP2 Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Authentication should have already taken place at the SIP2 selfcheck machine prior to the call to renew_all and as such should not require re-checking within the call itself. This can cause issues as it's common practice to pass along an empty AD field in the subsequent SIP requests and that defined but empty field can cause an error instead of performing the renewal. We should mimic the code in 'renew' which checks for the patron but does not check for a correct password. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 38

[Bug 27348] New: Error defining INDEXER_PARAMS in /etc/default/koha
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Aug '21

12 Aug '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27348 Bug ID: 27348 Summary: Error defining INDEXER_PARAMS in /etc/default/koha Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Zebra Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au The test at line 220 in koha-indexer creates an error since it isn't treating $INDEXER_PARAMS as a string. For example: /usr/sbin/koha-indexer: line 220: [: -sleep: binary operator expected -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 22