October 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 30714] New: Checkins from other branches spam the cataloguing log
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30714 Bug ID: 30714 Summary: Checkins from other branches spam the cataloguing log Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When an item from another branch is checked in, the holdingbranch is updated, and this change is logged. We record the checkin in statistics, we do not need the cataloguing update logged To recreate: 1 - Enable cataloguing log 2 - Check in an item with a different holding branch 3 - Check the action logs 4 - There is a cataloguing log for the holdingbranch update -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 30640] New: Focus does not always move to correct search header form field
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30640 Bug ID: 30640 Summary: Focus does not always move to correct search header form field Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 29155 The jQuery upgrade has introduced a bug with how the header search form is supposed to handle focus. This can be seen in any page where the "Check out" tab is present in the header search but not the pre-selected tab, e.g. the patron detail tab. On the patron details page the "Search patrons" tab is selected by default, and the cursor focus is automatically put on the form field. Switch to the "Check out" tab and you'll find that the focus doesn't move to the form field. The other tabs don't have this problem. I think this is the explanation: https://github.com/jquery/jquery/issues/4950 To fix we'll need to remove the "focus" class on form fields which might be hidden by default and update the tabs behavior to make sure the right field is focused on load. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29155 [Bug 29155] Upgrade jquery version to 3.6.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 30009] New: Records with invalid MarcXML show notes tab 'Descriptions(1)' but tab is empty
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30009 Bug ID: 30009 Summary: Records with invalid MarcXML show notes tab 'Descriptions(1)' but tab is empty Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org See bug 29690 - find/create a record with invalid marc Notes tab shows but is empty -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 23

[Bug 22407] New: OMNIBUS: Use DBIC relations to fetch related object rather than searching for the object
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22407 Bug ID: 22407 Summary: OMNIBUS: Use DBIC relations to fetch related object rather than searching for the object Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Example, instead of this: return Koha::Patrons->find( $self->guarantorid() ); We should do this: return Koha::Patron->_new_from_dbic($self->_result->guarantor); This allows us to use prefetch and perform a single query as opposed to multiple queries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 38

[Bug 15278] Port default slips and notices from bespoke syntax to Template Toolkit
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15278 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|rel_22_05_candidate | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 29939] New: Improve auth check in opac-ratings-ajax.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29939 Bug ID: 29939 Summary: Improve auth check in opac-ratings-ajax.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This script certainly needs a better authentication check but it is less trivial than the others. The block with Koha::Ratings calls should be within a check on loggedinuser. The whole script is a weird mix between an ajax script and a regular one. This statement will crash on an undefined borrowernumber (SQL constraint): Koha::Rating->new( { biblionumber => $biblionumber, borrowernumber => $loggedinuser, rating_value => $rating_value, })->store; -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 15348] Change/Edit estimated delivery date per order line
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15348 Bug 15348 depends on bug 29955, which changed state. Bug 29955 Summary: Move C4::Acquisition::populate_order_with_prices to Koha::Acquisition::Order https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29955 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Pushed to master |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 30218] New: Add subfield g to 150 heading_fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30218 Bug ID: 30218 Summary: Add subfield g to 150 heading_fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: domm(a)plix.at QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When creating authorities via SRU or linking exising authorities (via cgi-bin/koha/authorities/auth_finder.pl) the search results are generated using the hardcoded mappings $bib_heading_fields / $auth_heading_field from C4::Heading::MARC21. For TOPIC_TERM / field 150 these mappings currently include the subfield `abvxyz68`. But: We are using the GND provided by Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. We imported some authorities from there, for example: http://d-nb.info/gnd/4114171-4 "Kind <0-3 Jahre>" (kid 0-3 years) http://d-nb.info/gnd/4196417-2 "Kind <0-4 Jahre>" (kid 0-4 years) When searching for these terms, Koha only displays "Kind", which is not very helpful, as there are a lot of different authorities for different age bands. GND stores "Kind" in 150a, and "0-3 Jahre" in 150g. But in the hardcoded mappings used by Koha, subfield g is not included. This patch adds subfield g to these mappings, thus making it possible to easily select the correct authority. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 30941] New: Add value builders for UNIMARC 146 ($b, $c, $d, $e and $f)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30941 Bug ID: 30941 Summary: Add value builders for UNIMARC 146 ($b, $c, $d, $e and $f) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com Reporter: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 16

[Bug 15500] Add FRBRized view to OPAC & staff interface results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Add FRBRized View to OPAC & |Add FRBRized view to OPAC & |Staff Interface Results |staff interface results --- Comment #6 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- If you decide that there will be information added to the MARC records automatically, could we make the field configurable maybe or use a field that is not used in standard MARC? In our situation records are automatically overwritten/overlaid with a new version of the record from the union catalog every time someone changes/updates the records in the union catalog. In the past, all features altering the MARC record were quite problematic for us. But: we do have MARC overlay rules now :) Maybe a subfield of 942 could be used? This already lends itself to being write-protected having the OPAC suppression and item type as subfields. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0