May 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 30683] New: easy add event to calendar from e-mail
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30683 Bug ID: 30683 Summary: easy add event to calendar from e-mail Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: black23(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hi, today, it is quite common for services to send an iCal file or microdata (according to schema.org) as part of the e-mail notification, allowing the recipient to easily save the reminder to their calendar. In the case of a library, this could be a reminder of a book return date, a reminder of a registration expiration, etc. Including the correct address, opening hours and contact details. Do you think such a feature could be part of Koha notifications? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 14957] Write protecting MARC fields based on source of import
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14957 Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |30682 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30682 [Bug 30682] Indicate in addbiblio.pl when an edit will not be saved due to Overlay Rules -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 30270] New: Use numeric inputs instead of dropdowns for hold priority
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30270 Bug ID: 30270 Summary: Use numeric inputs instead of dropdowns for hold priority Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Currently we load a dropdown menu with the range of priority optins when listing holds on request.pl For a record with many holds (100+) this dropdown is large, and difficult to use The page size when loading this many dropdowns is also large We can reduce the problem by using numeric inputs and allowing the user to type new numbers, rather than selecting -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 14957] Write protecting MARC fields based on source of import
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14957 Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |30681 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30681 [Bug 30681] Allow overlay protection of MARC data by subfield -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14957] Write protecting MARC fields based on source of import
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14957 Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |30680 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30680 [Bug 30680] Behavior due to MARC Overlay Rules should be reflected in Diff view when staging MARC batches for import -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 25436] New: Google SSO
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25436 Bug ID: 25436 Summary: Google SSO Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 19.11 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Authentication Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: Diwakar.j(a)inspiria.edu.in QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: dpavlin(a)rot13.org We would like to single sign in/off through our google g-suite email id. or integration with google directory with Koha users, so we do not need to create users manually. If any one of those possible, kindly share the steps or advise. Regards, Diwakar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 27078] New: Starman hanging in 3-node Koha cluster when 1 node goes offline.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27078 Bug ID: 27078 Summary: Starman hanging in 3-node Koha cluster when 1 node goes offline. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 20.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: rcmcdonald91(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org So I've got a pretty interesting case that I've been playing with for the past several weeks. My goal has been to build a converged 3-node Koha cluster. The architecture looks like this: 1. Each node runs the "standalone" Koha stack (Koha, Starman, Apache, ElasticSearch, Memcached, MariaDB). For the sake of example, these nodes are 10.10.100.51, 10.10.100.52, and 10.10.100.53. 2. Galera is used to build the 3-node MariaDB cluster and each Koha node simply talks to the MariaDB server at localhost. This has worked fine and koha is blissfully unaware of the underlying galera cluster. 3. ElasticSearch is built in a 3-node cluster. koha-conf.xml is configured to use all three ES nodes (again at 10.10.100.51, 10.10.100.52, and 10.10.100.53). Again, koha doesn't seem to mind this at all. 4. All three nodes run Memcached and koha-conf.xml is configured to use all three Memcached nodes (again at 10.10.100.51-3). 5. Plack is enabled on all nodes using koha-plack --enable instancename && koha-plack --start instancename. 6. GlusterFS is used to serve up a 3-node replicated volume for /etc/koha/*, /usr/share/koha/*, and /var/lib/koha* across all three nodes. symlinks are used to present this storage in places koha is expecting them to be. Again, this works great. 6. Two HAProxy instances sit in front of these three koha instances (at 10.10.100.2 and 10.10.100.3). koha_trusted_proxies in koha-conf.xml is configured with these two IPs. 7. Finally, HAProxy handles SSL-offloading and client stickiness. This all works fine too. Here is the weirdness... When all three nodes are online, everything is absolutely fine. Everything is snappy, searching works, etc. When I change koha-conf.xml on one node, this is replicated to the other nodes immediately. However, when one node goes offline, the two remaining nodes become really sluggish. I've narrowed this down to a Starman/Plack issue, but I have no idea why. Here's how I arrived at that conclusion. * I started by killing pertinent services one-by-one on Node A. Killing MariaDB on Node A had no effect on Node B and C... though as expected, Node A started spitting out errors that the DB was unavailable. * Next, I stopped Memcached on Node A. Again, this had no effect on Node B and C. * Next, I stopped ElasticSeasrch on Node A. Again, this had no effect on Node B and Node C. * Next, I stopped GlusterFS on Node A. Again, this had no effect on Node B and Node C. * Next, I stopped koha-common on Node A. Again, this had no effect on Node B and Node C. So at this point, Node A is still "online." However, every service related to Koha is stopped (MariaDB, Memcached, ElasticSearch, Apache, koha-common, etc.). As expected, Node B and C keep on working just fine. Here is the weird part, When Node A actually goes offline (i.e. loses network connectivity and/or powers down), Node B and C become very very slow. They still serve traffic, but they are really sluggish. As soon as connectivity is restored to Node A, Node B and Node C speed right back up again. So is this related to Starman/Plack? When I disable Starman/Plack on all nodes, the speed of each node doesn't change when a single node goes offline. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 14242] Use ISBN-field to fill out purchase suggestions using Google Books API
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 May '22

03 May '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14242 --- Comment #150 from Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com> --- Pushed to master for 22.05, thanks to everybody involved 🦄 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14242] Use ISBN-field to fill out purchase suggestions using Google Books API
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 May '22

03 May '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14242 Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version(s)| |22.05.00 released in| | Status|Passed QA |Pushed to master -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10517] koha-restore fails to create mysqluser@mysql_hostname so zebra update fails
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 May '22

03 May '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10517 --- Comment #46 from Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com> --- Pushed to master for 22.05, thanks to everybody involved 🦄 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0