July 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 31150] New: _on or _date for DB date columns?
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31150 Bug ID: 31150 Summary: _on or _date for DB date columns? Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, nick(a)bywatersolutions.com, tomascohen(a)gmail.com We need to decide a naming for the dates column. We have _on and _date: % git grep -c '_date`' installer/data/mysql/kohastructure.sql installer/data/mysql/kohastructure.sql:14 % git grep -c '_on`' installer/data/mysql/kohastructure.sql installer/data/mysql/kohastructure.sql:31 I've tried to find previous discussion but haven't found much. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 30909] New: Regression, Permanent shelving location is always updated when editing location if both are mapped to MARC fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30909 Bug ID: 30909 Summary: Regression, Permanent shelving location is always updated when editing location if both are mapped to MARC fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl, nick(a)bywatersolutions.com Depends on: 27526, 27837 This issue was corrected in bug 27837, but bug 27526 led to a regression of that fix. To recreate: 1 - Map permanent_location to a marc field 2 - Expose that field in the item editor 3 - Change the location of the item and retain the permanent location on saving 4 - note that permanent location has changed anyway Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27526 [Bug 27526] Remove Mod/AddItemFromMarc from additem.pl https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27837 [Bug 27837] Permanent location is reverted to location when location updated and permanent_location mapped to MARC field -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 34

[Bug 26995] New: Drop column relationship from borrower tables
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26995 Bug ID: 26995 Summary: Drop column relationship from borrower tables Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Bug 14570 added a borrower_relationships table but it didn't remove the relationship column from the following tables: - deletedborrowers - borrowers - borrower_modifications It will need to be removed from many of the same places as "guarantorid" from Bug 14570 like: - C4/Auth_with_ldap - C4/SIP/ILS/Patron.pm - Possibly other places... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 36

[Bug 28543] New: Clicking on 'New record' will use default framework
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28543 Bug ID: 28543 Summary: Clicking on 'New record' will use default framework Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl In biblio records cataloguing, clicking on 'New from z39.50/SRU' will run action with default framework. Clicking on 'New record' sould do the same. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 28372] New: Use variables for 007 controlfield translations in MARC21slim2intranetResults.xsl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Oct '22

12 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28372 Bug ID: 28372 Summary: Use variables for 007 controlfield translations in MARC21slim2intranetResults.xsl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Slight performance improvement over fetching the same field every time -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 22

[Bug 30992] New: Hard to translate single word strings
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Oct '22

12 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30992 Bug ID: 30992 Summary: Hard to translate single word strings Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: I18N/L10N Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: frederic(a)tamil.fr There are a few single word strings that are hard to translate without context. Maybe we could use i18n with context hint to make this a little easier: koha-tmpl/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/en/modules/opac-serial-issues.tt:124 for koha-tmpl/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/en/modules/opac-reserve.tt:448 at Actually the latter highlights a case, where the spans might have a negative effect as they break the sentence apart into small bits: https://git.koha-community.org/Koha-community/Koha/src/branch/22.05.x/koha-… It's something like: [Waiting|On hold] for patron X [at|expected at] X [since X] The main problem here is, that these small bits can translate differently (at least in German) depending on context. In general it's quite bad to build up sentences like this as you don't know if the English grammar will fit any other languages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 31

[Bug 31269] New: DataTables error when managing staged MARC records
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Oct '22

12 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31269 Bug ID: 31269 Summary: DataTables error when managing staged MARC records Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic record staging/import Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Bug 31138 made some DataTable errors much more visible, which is good. One that was noticed was when managing staged MARC files. To recreate: 1. Stage a MARC record for import 2. Once you have one click on 'Manage staged records' 3. You will see an alert that says "Something went wrong when loading the table." 4. If you dismiss that you should see the following error: DataTables warning: table id=records-table - Requested unknown parameter '' for row 0, column 4. For more information about this error, please see http://datatables.net/tn/4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 27463] New: OAI-PMH date handling in ListBase.pm
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Oct '22

12 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27463 Bug ID: 27463 Summary: OAI-PMH date handling in ListBase.pm Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 20.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: rudolfbyker(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently in Koha/OAI/Server/ListBase.pm two different criteria are used for querying dates and displaying dates. When displaying the "Last Modified" date, this is used: SELECT MAX(timestamp) FROM ( SELECT timestamp FROM biblio_metadata WHERE biblionumber = ? UNION SELECT timestamp FROM deleteditems WHERE biblionumber = ? UNION SELECT timestamp FROM items WHERE biblionumber = ? ) bi But when querying, only biblio_metadata.timestamp is used. This should be made consistent. We could use a query like this (using a join, but removing the need to do a separate query for each record, so it might actually be faster than what we have now): select bm.biblionumber, greatest(bm.timestamp, i.timestamp) as t from biblio_metadata bm inner join items i on bm.biblionumber=i.biblionumber having t >= '2020-07-14' and t <= '2020-07-15' limit 10; Furthermore, we should only use items.timestamp and deleteditems.timestamp when the user has the "include_items" option set in their OAI-PMH config. It does not make sense to query item timestamps if you are only sending data about the records, and not the items. Therefore, if "include_items" is disabled, we can do a simpler query: select biblionumber, timestamp from biblio_metadata where timestamp >= '2020-07-14' and timestamp <= '2020-07-15' limit 10; See full discussion on IRC: http://irc.koha-community.org/koha/2021-01-18#i_2324076 Definition of "datestamp" for reference: https://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html#Datestamp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 22

[Bug 19064] New: OAI-PMH Records appearing in OAI that can' t be found in OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Oct '22

12 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19064 Bug ID: 19064 Summary: OAI-PMH Records appearing in OAI that can't be found in OPAC Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: marrone.patricio(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hello, While harvesting Koha records from the OAI-PMH interface, I found a series of records that can't be accessed using the OPAC interface. That is, the harvester finds a record with an identifier, say http://example.com/cgi-bin/koha/oai.pl?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dc… that shows the complete record. Trying to link to the OPAC using the biblionumber in the last part of the identifier, say http://example.com/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=572 I get a 404 error. I have yet to confirm this, but this might be related to the records being hidden in the OPAC view being leaked into OAI. In that case, I would expect the record to have a deleted status in OAI so that in can be removed from the harvesting results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 28950] New: serialsUpdate cron does not mark an issue late until the next issue is expected
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Oct '22

11 Oct '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28950 Bug ID: 28950 Summary: serialsUpdate cron does not mark an issue late until the next issue is expected Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Serials Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When running the cron it does this: 1 - Get all issues with a published date + grace period before today 2 - Loop the related subscriptions 3 - Check the next published date for the serial 4 - Compare the next issues publisheddate to today 5 - Mark late/generate the next issue if the next issue should already be published For a monthly serial with a 30 day grace period, this is usually ok For a yearly serial this is a problem 1 - Issue expected 2021-07-01, 30 day grace period 2 - As of 2021-08-01 that serial is past the grace period 3 - Next issue is planned for 2022-07-01 4 - Serial not marked late for a year -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 17