August 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 24446] New: Stockrotation: Update to use daterequested in branchtransfers
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '22

22 Aug '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24446 Bug ID: 24446 Summary: Stockrotation: Update to use daterequested in branchtransfers Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Bug 23092 adds a daterequested field to the branchtransfers table which better reflects how stockrotation utilises the existing datesent field. This patchset will update stockrotation to take advantage of the new field and in doing so rectify some of the rotation logic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 116

[Bug 28208] New: ModItemTransfer no longer updates item.datelastseen
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '22

22 Aug '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28208 Bug ID: 28208 Summary: ModItemTransfer no longer updates item.datelastseen Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Bug 24446 removed a call to ModDateLastSeen - we should blank the datelastseen before storing to update the field - or do we not need to update when calling ModItemTransfer? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 8589] Advanced Search for itemtype and location produces some results that are not useful
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '22

22 Aug '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8589 --- Comment #6 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #5) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #4) > > (In reply to David Cook from comment #3) > > > Is this still an issue? > > > > Yes, because items are not treated individually in search. > > What I should've said is that I don't understand the problem. > > Although as I write that out... I think that I understand now. The problem > is that one item fulfils one criterium of the search query and a different > item fulfils another criterium of the search query, so overall the search > query gets the hit, but the hit doesn't include an item that fulfils all the > criteria. > > Yeah that's interesting. Yep, that's it :) I've often struggled to explain why that is to users as well. The item search is exact, but for the catalog search (doesn't matter if Zebra or Elastic) this is an unresolved issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 9936] SIP2 should work with LDAP and CAS
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '22

22 Aug '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9936 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #8 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- You have a good point, it does require redirection. So for libraries using CAS at the moment it won't be possible to require login at the self check, unless the self check provider implements this in their software. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8589] Advanced Search for itemtype and location produces some results that are not useful
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '22

22 Aug '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8589 --- Comment #5 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #4) > (In reply to David Cook from comment #3) > > Is this still an issue? > > Yes, because items are not treated individually in search. What I should've said is that I don't understand the problem. Although as I write that out... I think that I understand now. The problem is that one item fulfils one criterium of the search query and a different item fulfils another criterium of the search query, so overall the search query gets the hit, but the hit doesn't include an item that fulfils all the criteria. Yeah that's interesting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 9936] SIP2 should work with LDAP and CAS
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '22

22 Aug '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9936 --- Comment #7 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #6) > Looking at this spring implementation of CAS, it looks like it works similar > to SAML and OIDC as I said in regard to the browser redirection: > https://docs.spring.io/spring-security/site/docs/3.1.4.RELEASE/reference/cas. > html So technically I think it's impossible for the SIP server to use CAS. But adding CAS auth to self-checkout interface could be interesting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 9936] SIP2 should work with LDAP and CAS
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '22

22 Aug '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9936 --- Comment #6 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- Looking at this spring implementation of CAS, it looks like it works similar to SAML and OIDC as I said in regard to the browser redirection: https://docs.spring.io/spring-security/site/docs/3.1.4.RELEASE/reference/ca… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9936] SIP2 should work with LDAP and CAS
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '22

22 Aug '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9936 --- Comment #5 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #4) > (In reply to David Cook from comment #3) > > Is this still valid? > > > > Looking at "C4/SIP/ILS/Patron.pm" and it looks like it uses "checkpw()" > > which looks like it will check LDAP. > > > > I'm not familiar with CAS but it looks like its more SSO rather than > > directory lookup like LDAP so don't know that it would ever work in this > > context. > > CAS is for authentication, like LDAP or Shibboleth. Some libraries ask for > the password at the self checks to avoid abuse of lost cards. LDAP and Shibboleth/SAML are totally different though. I'm not familiar with CAS, but I imagine it probably works similar to SAML and OIDC in that it requires browser redirection, which needs to happen client-side. LDAP, on the other hand, happens all server-side. So LDAP is easy to do on a SIP server, but you couldn't do SAML/OIDC (and maybe CAS) on the SIP server. Alex and I have been talking about SAML for the self checkout at bug 30444. It gets complicated... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8305] Add an icon for iOS home screens
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '22

22 Aug '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8305 David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook(a)prosentient.com.au --- Comment #5 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #4) > Looks like this is still actual. Safari gets a 404 on favicon. It does not > look at our regular link rel icon line. > Couldnt we just add a link rel apple touch line and point them to our > regular favicons ? Or is that too simple ? As I was reading through the comments, I was thinking that makes sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8618] Don't copy CCL queries into Z39.50 search form when using button from search results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '22

22 Aug '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8618 David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- It's really not that big of a deal, so I'm going to close this one -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0