September 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 31168] New: Temporary Item Locations
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31168 Bug ID: 31168 Summary: Temporary Item Locations Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl There is a needed item field when it comes to locations. Right now, if you put in a permanent location, if an item is returned, the location is temporarily changed to the cart location, and then back. However, there are other scenarios that are getting overlooked. Sometimes an item lives on a new books shelving location. Sometimes it lives on a display. These locations are temporary, and these items eventually have to make their way back to their permanent shelving location. There is no field for a temporary location, so we end up using the permanent location. And because we do this, we are unable to automate the process of setting it back to its regular shelving location when it is time, because there is nothing for the automatic item modifications by age tool to look at to determine what the permanent shelving location needs to be changed too. I propose that a temporary shelving location field be added, where we can select from the shelving locations the place that it will live for a little while, and the permanent shelving location can be set where it will usually live. We can then use the automatic item modifications by age tool to set this back after a set time. Ideally, it would be better if we could automate this from the record itself, perhaps setting a temporarily shelving location cutoff date. Otherwise, the temporary shelving location is only good as long as a rule exists for it in the tool. Having the cutoff date in the item record would make this extremely easy to use. Maybe fore a little extra, we could have a couple buttons next to the field with pre-defined (in preferences) lengths of time. For example, one button for New Books, and another for Displays. Click whichever button, and it would set the date x days from today based on the pref. Or you could manually pick a date from a date picker as to when it would revert back. Once that date comes around, that temporarily location can either be cleared or remain, but the permanent shelving location is displayed past the date. If a date is not entered, the temporary location is used indefinitely. And of course, if there is no temporary shelving location, the permanent location is used. Some of this could be done in stages, if not all at once, but this would be a fantastic step forward for libraries that utilize temporary placement and shelving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 26977] New: Update Koha Documentation to use absolute paths instead of relative ones
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26977 Bug ID: 26977 Summary: Update Koha Documentation to use absolute paths instead of relative ones Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Documentation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: rex(a)nicic.gov QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hi, I'm new to Koha, the previous Koha expert left their position a number of years ago and we left our version running along until the server crashed during an OS update. After that, I had to build a new server from scratch, install and upgrade Koha and get it working. I would like to ask that the Koha documentation be updated to make it easier for new people to learn Koha. Request: Please provide at least one absolute path location (rather than relative paths) when referring to file locations in a section. One example is the Cron jobs and Daemons page. I guess under the Cron Jobs subheading, I'm supposed to infer where files are located in the OS based on my flavor, but for someone new like me who is now responsible for becoming the expert on Koha, it would really ease my learning curve to have an absolute path offered at least once on the page. The relative paths on the page give me no indication of absolute location and even the Cron jobs description is making a huge assumption as to the user having knowledge that the writer of the documentation does. The text suggests that the files are in misc/ or bin/ but doesn't state that those are to be found in /usr/share/koha/, which would really help. Alternatively, a find command suggestion could be offered under the "Cron jobs" subheading for the user to locate the files. Since Koha files can be found in so many places, a new person like me doesn't know where to look and at least one absolute path to help someone get started and have a little confidence that they're finding the right file would be really nice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 29633] New: Unecessary GetMarcBiblio call in Koha::UI::Form::Builder::Item (?)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29633 Bug ID: 29633 Summary: Unecessary GetMarcBiblio call in Koha::UI::Form::Builder::Item (?) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Andrew contacted me to raise a potential problem coming from bug 27526: commit 7a8357f7099d0863a322d1e91741b792b97fd6e1 Bug 27526: Adjust code to use Koha::Items -C4::Biblio::EmbedItemsInMarcBiblio({ - marc_record => $temp, - biblionumber => $biblionumber }); has been removed. I have tried to know where the items subfields could be used and found, in Koha/UI/Form/Builder/Item.pm: 1. only if itemcallnumber is used 164 my $temp2 = $marc_record->field($CNtag); 2. cataloguing plugins: 316 record => $marc_record, I have not found any cataloguing plugins using the MARC::Record (some are retrieving it when they have been passed in parameter, but that's another story). So maybe we could: * Remove marc_record from generate_subfield_form param list * Fetch it in the itemcallnumber block * Remove it from the cataloguing plugins -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 27297] New: When itemtype is marked as required in OpacSuggestion MandatoryFields the field is not required
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27297 Bug ID: 27297 Summary: When itemtype is marked as required in OpacSuggestion MandatoryFields the field is not required Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Two issues: 1 - We only add the required class, we don't make the input required 2 - We don't add a 'blank' option, so the field is preselected -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 20

[Bug 29290] New: Add routes to fetch checkouts for a given biblio
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29290 Bug ID: 29290 Summary: Add routes to fetch checkouts for a given biblio Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: REST API Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com I propose we add GET /biblios/:biblio_id/checkouts it will have the same behavior as /checkouts, but filtering by the specified biblio. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 30

[Bug 27957] New: Attributes removed in LDAP
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27957 Bug ID: 27957 Summary: Attributes removed in LDAP Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Authentication Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: dpavlin(a)rot13.org Working on bug 27857 (actually, on the follow-up bug 27956), I found that the Koha::Patron->extended_attributes setter is used to write the new attributes. This happens inside a Koha::Patron::Attribute::Types loop which is used to determine 'valid' attributes (good). The problem is 'extended_attributes' actually calls: $self->extended_attributes->filter_by_branch_limitations->delete; which deletes the existing attribute. So calling it for setting a single attribute makes it... delete all the attributes each time! There's also some funky logic in checkpw_ldap. The $patron object seems to be retrieved in several places and even inside a loop. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 30205] New: Add biblio.subtitle to the subscription-detail.pl page
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30205 Bug ID: 30205 Summary: Add biblio.subtitle to the subscription-detail.pl page Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Serials Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org On the subscription-detail page we show the biblio.title, we should also show the biblio.subtitle, if it exists. This can be shown both in the h1 heading and on the 'Biblio:' line. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 19

[Bug 27909] New: When upgrading, old sysprefs are only copied in english news items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27909 Bug ID: 27909 Summary: When upgrading, old sysprefs are only copied in english news items Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I don't know how to reproduce this... When we upgraded from 18.05 to 19.05, the contents for OpacNavRight was copied into the new news item OpacNavRight (english), but not fr-CA which is also installed in all our clients' OPACs. Now we've started upgrading from 19.05 to 20.05 and the old system preferences are still only copied into the english news items. It's a bit more problematic because there are a lot more and all our clients at least have something in opacheader. My colleague Philippe coded a script to copy everything into our fr_CA news items, but this should probably be handled in the upgrade (atomic update?). Here are the news items from old system preferences: - OpacNavRight (19.05?) - opacheader (20.05 bug 22880) - OpacCustomSearch (20.05.03 bug 23796) - OpacMainUserBlock (20.05 bug 23794) - opaccredits (20.05.03 bug 23795) - OpacLoginInstructions (20.05.03 bug 23797) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 26917] New: Searching for patrons: member.pl vs circulation.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26917 Bug ID: 26917 Summary: Searching for patrons: member.pl vs circulation.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When searching for a partial name, you get a list of results. Depending on whether you start your search in check out or patron search, the results differ. The records are the same, but the layout and information shown is different. This is confusing to staff, as they don't remember which place to search for the information they want to search through. I would suggest that we standardize the results so they are consistent. On top of that, I would like to see the ability to pick what information is included the table of results. There are fields we don't need to see, and there are fields we would like to see, in order to determine which patron is the right one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 26980] New: UNIMARC_sync_date_created_with_marc_biblio.pl is setting MarcFieldForModifierName to CLI
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26980 Bug ID: 26980 Summary: UNIMARC_sync_date_created_with_marc_biblio.pl is setting MarcFieldForModifierName to CLI Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: didier.gautheron(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz Hi, Since Bug 22600 patches there's a context userenv and MarcFieldForModifierName is modified, but like Bug 21487 it doesn't really make sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1