January 2023 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 32697] New: XSLT: Treat serials and integrating resources differently in XSLT views
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jan '23

23 Jan '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32697 Bug ID: 32697 Summary: XSLT: Treat serials and integrating resources differently in XSLT views Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org LDR, pos. 7 i = integrating resource and s = serial are treated the same in the XSLT views for detail page and results list. They are not the same and we should use individual icons or at least descriptive texts. For example a i resource could be a loose leaf binder, but is now displayed with a serial icon. Ideally we should use the descriptions of 008, Pos. 21 if LDR Pos. 7 = i. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jan '23

23 Jan '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 --- Comment #54 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Julian Maurice from comment #53) > I don't know what's wrong on sandboxes, but I just retried it locally: I > reproduced the error, then updatedbix + restart starman worked. > marcfield_mode column exist on the sandbox so updatedabase was correctly run. Yes, that's odd, the output of the "refresh schema" looked like it finished ok. Could you maybe attach the 'DBIC don't push' patch here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jan '23

23 Jan '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 --- Comment #53 from Julian Maurice <julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com> --- I don't know what's wrong on sandboxes, but I just retried it locally: I reproduced the error, then updatedbix + restart starman worked. marcfield_mode column exist on the sandbox so updatedabase was correctly run. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jan '23

23 Jan '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 --- Comment #52 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Julian Maurice from comment #38) > I had the same issue. After applying the patch, you need to run > updatedatabase.pl, update_dbix_class_files.pl, and then restart Koha. I tried that on the sandboxes running "Refresh schema" and "Restart services", but the problem remained. See: http://sandboxes.ptfs-europe.co.uk/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jan '23

23 Jan '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 --- Comment #51 from Julian Maurice <julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Michaela Sieber from comment #50) > When trying to add a new Additional Field an error message appears : "The > field could not be inserted. Perhaps the name already exists?" See comment 38 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 5362] Simple (non-MARC) cataloging interface
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jan '23

23 Jan '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5362 David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook(a)prosentient.com.au --- Comment #3 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #2) > Is this still something we intend to do? It would leave us with 3 editors... > simple, standard and advanced to maintain. Occasionally, I think that it would be interesting to provide this using a Koha plugin. But I think people have always managed to adapt to MARC so it hasn't been a pressing issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Jan '23

21 Jan '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 --- Comment #50 from Michaela Sieber <michaela.sieber(a)kit.edu> --- (In reply to Julian Maurice from comment #49) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #43) > > I was wondering, could the problem stem from the itemtypes being not a > > 'real' AV? You set it up like one, but it's actually drawn from the > > itemtypes table. > > Yes, that was it. > It should be ok now. When trying to add a new Additional Field an error message appears : "The field could not be inserted. Perhaps the name already exists?" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 28486] New: MARCItemFieldsToOrder values lost when using Add Order button
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Jan '23

21 Jan '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28486 Bug ID: 28486 Summary: MARCItemFieldsToOrder values lost when using Add Order button Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When populating a basket via a staged MARC file and checking for duplicates, if a duplicate is found then one is expected to use the "Add Order" button on that title to manage that title individually and decide whether to use the existing bib or create a new one. Either choice pushes one to neworderempty.pl (rather than addorderiso2709.pl). Values from MARCItemFieldsToOrder are not applied on neworderempty.pl, which complicates the workflow and requires the user to manually enter those values. To recreate: 1 - export a bib from your collection 2 - edit that bib to add some item values formatted in accordance with your MARCItemFieldsToOrder syspref 3 - create a basket in Acq set to create items at ordering 4 - add to your basket from a new file, select your exported and edited bib 5 - on addorderiso2709.pl, confirm your MARCItemFieldsToOrder values show up 6 - click Add Order 7 - select wither Use Existing Record or Create New Record 8 - confirm that you end up on neworderempty.pl without your MARCItemFieldsToOrder values -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Jan '23

20 Jan '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 --- Comment #49 from Julian Maurice <julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #43) > I was wondering, could the problem stem from the itemtypes being not a > 'real' AV? You set it up like one, but it's actually drawn from the > itemtypes table. Yes, that was it. It should be ok now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Jan '23

20 Jan '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 Julian Maurice <julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |Needs Signoff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0