January 2023 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 27834] New: CircControl syspref is used wrong in TooMany function C4::Circulation
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Feb '26

04 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27834 Bug ID: 27834 Summary: CircControl syspref is used wrong in TooMany function C4::Circulation Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: joonas.kylmala(a)helsinki.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com The CircControl syspref description says > Use the checkout and fines rules of > PickupLibrary: the library you are logged in at. > PatronLibrary: the library the patron is from. > ItemHomeLibrary: the library the item is from. This is mostly true but there is one exception in the TooMany function where it actually doesn't just change which libraries rules are used but how the the calculation is performed. With PatronLibrary set the behaviour is as expected by reading the syspref description. However with the setting PickupLibrary the behaviour changes now, instead of just using the rules of the pickup library we also only take into account the loans in the pickup library when calculating whether we are over the checkout limit or not. The same happens with ItemHomeLibrary where we instead calculate the patron's checkouts in the home library of the item being checked out. We should really try to fix this either by a) showing that ItemHomeLibrary and PickupLibrary is unacceptable and no one actually wants that, that would allow then making the behaviour similar as what it is to PatronLibrary (so just selecting the right circ rule instead of changing calculation method). b) Provide a new syspref for changing the calcutation method when PickupLibrary or ItemHomeLibrary CircControl values are used, and set it on upgrade enabled as default. Ps. svc/letters/preview might use CirControl wrongly as well, I'm not 100% I didn't quite understand but as for other usages of CircControl syspref I grepped where it was used and it correctly only changed the circ rules to be used instead of changing behaviour. So in addition to TooMany we might have to do some changes to svc/letters/preview if it turns out it changes behaviour as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 46

[Bug 22436] New: add move or copy control field from or to subfield in MARC modification templates
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Feb '26

03 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22436 Bug ID: 22436 Summary: add move or copy control field from or to subfield in MARC modification templates Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- MARC modification templates does not allow to mix control field and the subfield of a regular field, we should allow that. But of course not the mix of an entire regular field and the subfield of a regular field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 31268] New: Clearly indicate reason for failed item creation when receiving expired subscription
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Feb '26

03 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31268 Bug ID: 31268 Summary: Clearly indicate reason for failed item creation when receiving expired subscription Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Serials Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrewfh(a)dubcolib.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Bug 29188 points out that while the manual says one cannot receive issues in an expired subscription, Koha is currently allowing one to do so. However, Koha *is* refusing to create an item when receiving an issue on an expired subscription. To recreate: 1 - create a subscription set to *not* create items, subscription end date in the past 2 - save subscription, confirm it shows as expired, confirm you can receive an issue anyway 3 - create a subscription set *to* create items, subscription end date in the past 4- save subscription, confirm it shows as expired, confirm you can get to the receiving page but setting the dropdown for the expected issue to "Arrived" does not cause an item edit box to appear 5- create a subscription set *to* create items, subscription end date in the future, number of issues set to 1 6- save subscription, receive 1 issue, confirm it works as intended 7- confirm subscription now shows a confusing "Subscription will expire on [subscription end date]" message even though the date isn't the problem 8- Attempt to receive another issue, confirm that now the item edit box won't pop up, as in step 4 In steps 4 and 8, the item edit box will appear if one attempts to receive a supplemental issue, but the item will refuse to save, giving an erroneous "missing required field" message. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 31612] New: koha-z3950-responder breaks if it's run in a Koha that was created before bug 28364 was applied
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Feb '26

03 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31612 Bug ID: 31612 Summary: koha-z3950-responder breaks if it's run in a Koha that was created before bug 28364 was applied Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Z39.50 / SRU / OpenSearch Servers Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl The problem is the same as Bug 28364 but that it affects upgraded Koha instances rather than new Koha instances. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 27704] New: Group locations for advanced search
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27704 Bug ID: 27704 Summary: Group locations for advanced search Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: severine.queune(a)bulac.fr QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 116878 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=116878&action=e… Add a goup Locations option - Advanced search.png Like the option exists for itype with ITEMTYPECAT authorized value, it could be useful for users if we would group locations into several categories in OPAC advanced search and facets. For example, we have 29 different storage location only accessible to staff and 4 public locations in our catalog, which are quite confusing descriptions for opac users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 24082] New: Add a 'refund' option to anonymous payments
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24082 Bug ID: 24082 Summary: Add a 'refund' option to anonymous payments Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org With bug 23442 we add a process for recording refunds to patrons. We need to expand this for anonymous payments once bug 23354 is available. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 53

[Bug 31503] New: Groundwork for 20380 (mail consent)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31503 Bug ID: 31503 Summary: Groundwork for 20380 (mail consent) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 170

[Bug 31533] New: Add opt-in/opt-out flags to patron consents
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31533 Bug ID: 31533 Summary: Add opt-in/opt-out flags to patron consents Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Part of the 20380 set. Building on top of 31503. While we now only enforce the GDPR consent if the pref is set to Enforced, we leave other consents empty. Which actually is opt-in. They need to go to the consents page and enable the specific consent. If we would add opt-out, we can either add consents for all users or make PatronConsent a bit smarter and only register refusal (opt-out). It feels more consistent to add all consents to the table, and add them too in the self reg process. But when you add a new consent type and mark it as opt-out, we should then populate the table too. Do we also need a Mandatory flag? Historically, we treat the GDPR consent as such. Other consents may not be of that same category. But we might want the user to make an explicit choice there without the same exceptional approach that we use for GDPR. How do we get him on that page? If he arrives there, we can obviously allow saving only when those mandatories are filled.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 30968] New: opac-authorites-home.pl still accessible even when OpacAuthorities system preference is turned off
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30968 Bug ID: 30968 Summary: opac-authorites-home.pl still accessible even when OpacAuthorities system preference is turned off Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: wizzyrea(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When the system preference OpacAuthorities is turned off, the page https://your.library.here/cgi-bin/koha/opac-authorities-home.pl is still accessible and likely shouldn't be. To test: set OpacAuthorities to Don't Allow try to visit https://your.library.here/cgi-bin/koha/opac-authorities-home.pl note that the page is still accessible. Thanks for checking it out! Liz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 24288] New: Add wording to authorized value interface to indicate valid code length
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24288 Bug ID: 24288 Summary: Add wording to authorized value interface to indicate valid code length Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Several standard authorized values feed into fields that require a single character code (LOST, NOTFORLOAN, DAMAGED, RESTRICTED, WITHDRAWN). It'd be good to have some wording in the authorized value interface that would indicate this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 29