February 2023 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Feb '23

10 Feb '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #145536|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #58 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Created attachment 146500 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=146500&action=e… Bug 11844: Take into account itemtypes, branches, and cn_source MARC subfields can be linked to "authorised values" that are not real authorised values: itemtypes, branches, and cn_source. Those were not taken into account. This patch fixes that Test plan: 1. Create additional fields for order lines with a MARC subfield that is linked to one of those "fake" authorised values list 2. Follow the same steps as in the main test plan Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Feb '23

10 Feb '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #145535|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #57 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Created attachment 146497 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=146497&action=e… Bug 11844: Use additional fields for order lines This patch allows to create additional fields for order lines. Once created, these fields can be filled during order line creation or modification. If additional field is linked to a MARC field, there are two possible scenario: - MARC field mode = get: The field cannot be modified and its value is retrieved from the bibliographic record (current behaviour) - MARC field mode = set: The field can be modified and its value is saved to the bibliographic record (new behaviour) If additional field is linked to an authorised value category, then authorised values are used. If not directly linked to an authorised value category, but linked to a MARC field, a search for an AV category is made on MARC default framework. This patch doesn't display additional fields value anywhere (except in order line creation/modification). Future patches will do that. Test plan: 1/ Go to Acquisitions home 2/ In the left menu, click on "Add order line fields" 3/ Click on "New field" button 4/ Give the field a name (unique), no AV category and no MARC field. 5/ Save. 6/ Create 5 other fields: a/ no AV category, a MARC field not linked to AV category, MARC field mode = get b/ no AV category, a MARC field not linked to AV category, MARC field mode = set c/ no AV category, a MARC field linked to AV category, MARC field mode = get d/ no AV category, a MARC field linked to AV category, MARC field mode = set e/ an AV category, no MARC field 7/ Create everything you need to be able to create order lines (supplier, basket, ...) 8/ Create an order line. At bottom of the page, you should see your additional fields, with authorised values dropdrown list for fields (c), (d) and (e). Fields (a) and (c) should be disabled. 9/ Fill these fields with some data and save order line 10/ check that data was correctly saved into biblio for fields (b) and (d), but not for (a) and (c) 11/ modify the same order line, check that values you've filled are correctly retrieved and that values for (a) and (c) were correctly retrieved from the bibliographic record 12/ modify all values, save, and check biblio once again Signed-off-by: Harold Dramer <harold.dramer(a)nyls.edu> Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Feb '23

10 Feb '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |Signed Off -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Feb '23

10 Feb '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Feb '23

10 Feb '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=32944 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 32944] New: Add format check to MARC configuration option for additional fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Feb '23

10 Feb '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32944 Bug ID: 32944 Summary: Add format check to MARC configuration option for additional fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com The MARC configuration option for additional fields expects the format 245$a. 245a or 245 don't appear to work. We should add a check on the format so people don't run into errors unnecessarily here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13188] Make it possible to configure mandatory patron data differently between OPAC registration and modification
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Feb '23

10 Feb '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13188 Aude Charillon <aude.charillon(a)ptfs-europe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Manual |Manual-updated Status|Needs documenting |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #44 from Aude Charillon <aude.charillon(a)ptfs-europe.com> --- Manual updated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11844] Additional fields for order lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Feb '23

10 Feb '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 --- Comment #56 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Trying to see if I can help out here... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13188] Make it possible to configure mandatory patron data differently between OPAC registration and modification
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Feb '23

10 Feb '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13188 Aude Charillon <aude.charillon(a)ptfs-europe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Documentation| |https://gitlab.com/koha-com submission| |munity/koha-manual/-/merge_ | |requests/619 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 32940] New: [Bug 30280 follow-up] Subject-heading-thesaurus-conventions search field missing in Zebra
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Feb '23

10 Feb '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32940 Bug ID: 32940 Summary: [Bug 30280 follow-up] Subject-heading-thesaurus-conventions search field missing in Zebra Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: januszop(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: frank.hansen(a)ub.lu.se, katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de In the bug 30280 a new searchfield Subject-heading-thesaurus-conventions has been introduced for ElasticSearch (indexing 040 $f of an authority record). This searchfield is used in C4::Heading::_search with an alias thesaurus-conventions (introduced with the same bug and defined only in Koha/SearchEngine/Elasticsearch/QueryBuilder.pm). At the same time, neither Subject-heading-thesaurus-conventions nor thesaurus-conventions are defined for Zebra. As a result, while performing a linking (with link_bibs_to_authorities.pl for instance) of a biblio 6XX field with 2nd indicator == 7 and proper $2 (e.g. 650 _7 $a Ekonomia $2 DBN) with Zebra engine we get: error: Unsupported Use attribute (114) thesaurus-conventions Bib-1 On the other hand, according to the stable Zebra configuration (for 15 years or so) Koha inserts 040 $f into the Subject-heading-thesaurus index, as goes there 008/11 byte, transformed in the following way: a => lcsh b => lcac c => mesh d => nal k => cash n => notapplicable r => aat s => sears v => rvm So, maybe ES should go the same way? If for some reasons no, the Koha part should be modified accordingly. It seems that changes made in Koha in favour of the ES should always be very carefully checked in Zebra context... Now the linking feature in Zebra does not work in most cases (also described in the bug 32916). Seeing the comment at https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30280#c58, I understand that the enhancement is still not mature enough. So, I am wondering that it has been accepted in the released version (22.11.00)... Was this not by mistake? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0