July 2023 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 33544] New: Squash some ILL fields to alleviate request table overflow
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33544 Bug ID: 33544 Summary: Squash some ILL fields to alleviate request table overflow Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com The ILL requests' table listing all ILL requests is prone to overflowing it's container and requiring horizontal scrolling. This is against a number of accessibility guidelines, and just doesn't look very nice. I believe we could merge a number of the current columns to display the same data vertically in one column. I think the item details (author, title, article title, issue, volume, year, pages) could all be merged into a column that looks more like how we display search catalogue search results. That would save us a lot of horizontal space to start with. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 69

[Bug 30331] New: Allow RenewalPeriodBase behavior to differ between manual and automatic renewals
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30331 Bug ID: 30331 Summary: Allow RenewalPeriodBase behavior to differ between manual and automatic renewals Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com We should have a way to make auto-renewals and manual renewals follow different RenewalPeriodBase behavior. I'm working with a library that uses a mix of manual and automatic renewals. For items that auto-renew, the renewal happens two days before the item is due, so they want RenewalPeriodBase set to add time on to the existing due date so the patron gets their full renewal period. But for items renewed manually, they want RenewalPeriodBase set to calculate from the renewal date, though, so patrons can't renew early and lock in extra time with the item. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 52

[Bug 31717] New: Value builder unimarc_field_010.pl should also use 214$c
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31717 Bug ID: 31717 Summary: Value builder unimarc_field_010.pl should also use 214$c Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Value builder unimarc_field_010.pl tries to find publisher from ISBN in order to fill 210$c. Since there is now 214$c for publisher this value builder should be adapted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 42

[Bug 30261] New: opac/tracklinks.pl renders 404 incorrectly
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30261 Bug ID: 30261 Summary: opac/tracklinks.pl renders 404 incorrectly Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org As per https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23329#c87, tracklinks.pl will try to generate an intranet 404 instead of an OPAC 404 if the script is visited without the syspref being activated or if the URL is not a valid one to redirect to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 34

[Bug 28297] New: can't save system preference and field not marked as modified when changing value
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28297 Bug ID: 28297 Summary: can't save system preference and field not marked as modified when changing value Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: victor(a)tuxayo.net QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com == Test plan == 1. Search any syspref that has a text input 2. input a value, like 3, you see "modified" 3. save 4. refresh (tech note: the <input> will now have value=3) 5. input 5, you see "modified" 6. save (tech note: the <input> still has value=3, this is the cause) 7. input 3, you don't see "modified" (this in wrong) 8. save 9 "nothing to save", this is wrong -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 20

[Bug 21941] New: Incorrect GROUP BY in circ/reserveratios.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21941 Bug ID: 21941 Summary: Incorrect GROUP BY in circ/reserveratios.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com DBD::mysql::st execute failed: 'koha_kohadev.reserves.reservedate' isn't in GROUP BY [for Statement "SELECT reservedate, reserves.borrowernumber as borrowernumber, reserves.biblionumber, reserves.branchcode as branch, items.holdingbranch, items.itemcallnumber, items.itemnumber, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT items.itemcallnumber ORDER BY items.itemnumber SEPARATOR '|') as listcall, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT homebranch ORDER BY items.itemnumber SEPARATOR '|') as homebranch_list, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT holdingbranch ORDER BY items.itemnumber SEPARATOR '|') as holdingbranch_list, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT items.location ORDER BY items.itemnumber SEPARATOR '|') as l_location, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT items.itype ORDER BY items.itemnumber SEPARATOR '|') as l_itype, reserves.found, biblio.title, biblio.author, count(DISTINCT reserves.borrowernumber) as reservecount, count(DISTINCT items.itemnumber) as itemcount FROM reserves LEFT JOIN items ON items.biblionumber=reserves.biblionumber LEFT JOIN biblio ON reserves.biblionumber=biblio.biblionumber WHERE notforloan = 0 AND damaged = 0 AND itemlost = 0 AND withdrawn = 0 AND reservedate >= ? AND reservedate <= ? GROUP BY reserves.biblionumber ORDER BY reservecount DESC" with ParamValues: 0='2017-12-04 00:00', 1='2018-12-04 00:00'] at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/circ/reserveratios.pl line 150. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 28

[Bug 15792] New: Double-clicking the 'renew' button on circulation.pl will double-charge account management fee
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15792 Bug ID: 15792 Summary: Double-clicking the 'renew' button on circulation.pl will double-charge account management fee Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.18 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: barton(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com PREREQUISITES 1) Create an account type that has an enrollment fee, and create a borrower of that type. 2) Write off any account management fees charged to that borrower by the account creation. STEPS TO RE-CREATE 1) Change borrower's dateexpiry to make the borrower expired. 2) Paste borrower's card number into 'Check out' bar 3) A warning will appear saying that the borrower's account has expired, including a 'Renew' link. 4) Double-click the link 5) Check the borrower's fines. You will see two account management fees in a row. distinct from the fee that was written off just after the patron was created. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 20

[Bug 32652] New: Standardize slots selection between staff interface and opac
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32652 Bug ID: 32652 Summary: Standardize slots selection between staff interface and opac Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: koha(a)univ-lyon3.fr QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Hi, Now that thanks to BZ31265, we have nice slots selection for the curbside pickups at OPAC, it would be nice to have the same in the staff interface. It's quite disturbing to have a different way to count the pickup (number of pickup already taken in staff interface and number left in OPAC). And it would be more intuitive to have radio button to select a slot. Thanks, Sonia -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 18

[Bug 33296] New: Linker should search for authority records with an appropriate 008/14, 15, 16 value
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 May '26

23 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33296 Bug ID: 33296 Summary: Linker should search for authority records with an appropriate 008/14,15,16 value Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: phil(a)chetcolibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 33277 In an authority record, 008/14 = 'a' says it's appropriate for use as a main or added entry (1xx, 7xx), 008/15 = 'a' says it's appropriate for use as a subject entry, and 008/16 = 'a' says it's appropriate for use as a series entry (800-830, 440 since we still support it). In a world where we support multiple subject thesauri, we need a way to tell the difference between a name entry which intends to be used as a main entry and one which intends to only be used as a subject authority, and the way the subject-only one should say that is by having 008/14 = 'b' Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33277 [Bug 33277] Correctly handle linking subfields with no defined thesaurus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 36

[Bug 21555] New: Merging Patrons allows for all patrons to be selected
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 May '26

23 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21555 Bug ID: 21555 Summary: Merging Patrons allows for all patrons to be selected Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com The feature of merging patrons (bug #9302 ) did include a fail safe, according to the bug, if/when using this feature, the option of "selecting all" patrons from a search was chosen, then the option to merge could not be used. When testing this feature, if a few patrons were chosen and then "select all" is chosen, the merge feature is still available to use. If no patrons are chosen and then "select all" is chosen, merge option is not available. Test: how it currently works 1. Search for Patrons by Last Name by Letter 2. From this list, choose patron a, patron b, patron c 3. See that merge patron option available 4. Now select all patrons - merge patron option still available Test: (how it should work) 1. Search for patrons by last name by letter 2.From this list choose patron a, patron b, patron c 3. See that merge patron option avail 4. Now "select all" patrons 3. See that merge patron option not available (greyed out) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 14