October 2024 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 29948] New: Display author information for researches
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '26

24 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29948 Bug ID: 29948 Summary: Display author information for researches Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 29897 Display author's information from 371, 372, 373 (email, activity, etc.) in the same area than identifiers (from bug 29897). Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29897 [Bug 29897] Display author identifiers for researchers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 68

[Bug 26573] New: Limit patron attribute types to more than one patron category
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '26

24 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26573 Bug ID: 26573 Summary: Limit patron attribute types to more than one patron category Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Currently, Koha doesn't allow to limit a patron attribute type to more than one patron category. Let's say I have a patron attribute type STUDENTID, and I want to limit this attribute to the categories "undergrad students" and "grad students". I have to create two different patron attribute types. To replicate: 1) Go to Administration > Patron attribute types 2) Create a new patron attribute 3) Note that the "Category" field is a dropdown and you can't choose more than one patron category to assign this attribute type to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 93

[Bug 26197] New: Using Rancor while cataloging doesn't appear to check for existing records
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '26

24 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26197 Bug ID: 26197 Summary: Using Rancor while cataloging doesn't appear to check for existing records Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Upon testing this, while cataloging a new record using the basic editor Koha will find a duplicate record existing in Koha but didn't find the same duplicate using the Advanced Editor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 38255] New: Do not use dataTable constructor directly
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '26

24 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38255 Bug ID: 38255 Summary: Do not use dataTable constructor directly Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 36640 We should not use dataTable() but our own KohaTable or kohaTable. It will help to get rid of repeated rules (eg. NoSort). Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36640 [Bug 36640] Upgrade DataTables from 1.13.6 to 2.x -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 132

[Bug 37570] New: Add possibility to send request on other url defined by a new syspref SearchAlsoIn
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '26

24 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37570 Bug ID: 37570 Summary: Add possibility to send request on other url defined by a new syspref SearchAlsoIn Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: thibaud.guillot(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hello Like OPACSearchForTitleIn I would like to purpose you a new syspref "SearchAlsoIn" which adds the possibility of defining urls to launch the query on other sites. This can be added on both sides (personal pages and OPAC results pages). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 37831] New: Timezone ignored when passing rfc3339 formatted date
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '26

24 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37831 Bug ID: 37831 Summary: Timezone ignored when passing rfc3339 formatted date Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: REST API Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: tomascohen(a)gmail.com When requesting the REST API we are getting datetimes in the RFC3339 format, for instance: 2024-09-04T06:03:34-03:00 This is retrieving the value that is stored DB, and using the timezone defined in the $KOHA_CONF file. However this format is not correctly into account when we search or, more importantly, when we create/update objects. Examples (Using the Buenos Aires timezome, which is UTC-3 "America/Argentina/Buenos_Aires"): 1. POST /api/v1/patrons with "due_date": "2024-09-09T23:59:00-00:00", And you will get "due_date": "2024-09-09T23:59:00-03:00", in DB: date_due: 2024-09-09 23:59:00 2. GET /api/v1/jobs?q={"enqueued_on":{">":"2024-09-04T09:26:52-03:00"}} is generating the following query SELECT `me`.`id`, `me`.`status`, `me`.`progress`, `me`.`size`, `me`.`borrowernumber`, `me`.`type`, `me`.`queue`, `me`.`data`, `me`.`context`, `me`.`enqueued_on`, `me`.`started_on`, `me`.`ended_on` FROM `background_jobs` `me` WHERE `enqueued_on` > '2024-09-04T09:26:52-03:00' But when you run it manually, you get a warning: | Warning | 1292 | Truncated incorrect datetime value: '2024-09-04T09:26:52-03:00' | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 22610] New: SIP Payment Types should be moved out of accountype
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '26

24 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22610 Bug ID: 22610 Summary: SIP Payment Types should be moved out of accountype Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Bug 18786 introduced a dedicated payment_type field to the database and an authorized value for it's population.. we should move the SIP payment type appendages from accounttype into this AV list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 56

[Bug 20307] New: Language overlay for authorized values
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '26

24 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20307 Bug ID: 20307 Summary: Language overlay for authorized values Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 14100 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14100 [Bug 14100] Add base to make item types, branch names, sysprefs values and authorised values translatable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 147

[Bug 36271] New: Bookings should respect circulation rules for max loan periods
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '26

24 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36271 Bug ID: 36271 Summary: Bookings should respect circulation rules for max loan periods Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Currently, bookings are on/off at the item level, but the booking period is entirely open meaning an item can be booked for any period. We should refine this to allow libraries to control the maximum length an item can be booked for. During the original development, I suggested perhaps we should set the maximum to the loan length of the item times the max renewals from the circulation rules.. However, I didn't get much feedback as to whether this was appropriate or whether people wanted a distinct rule for these items or another alternative. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 75

[Bug 37354] New: Bookings should respect circulation rules for max loan periods
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '26

24 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37354 Bug ID: 37354 Summary: Bookings should respect circulation rules for max loan periods Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com, david(a)davidnind.com, fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com, gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de, kkrueger(a)cuyahogalibrary.org, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com, laurence.rault(a)biblibre.com, nick(a)bywatersolutions.com, testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org, thibaud.guillot(a)biblibre.com Depends on: 34440 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #36271 +++ The original bug for this took on a life of its own and became broader in scope adding a series of circulation rules for the bookings system I've cloned it here to propose my original more limited-in-scope solution using existing circulation rules for loan length * renewals count. --------------------------------------------------------------- Currently, bookings are on/off at the item level, but the booking period is entirely open meaning an item can be booked for any period. We should refine this to allow libraries to control the maximum length an item can be booked for. During the original development, I suggested perhaps we should set the maximum to the loan length of the item times the max renewals from the circulation rules.. However, I didn't get much feedback as to whether this was appropriate or whether people wanted a distinct rule for these items or another alternative. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34440 [Bug 34440] Add warm-up and cool-down periods to bookings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 63