October 2024 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 36604] New: Document what statistics wizards actually count
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36604 Bug ID: 36604 Summary: Document what statistics wizards actually count Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Documentation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I find the statistic wizards very opaque and it's not clear at all what they actually count. I often have questions about them from clients, especially when libraries are doing their end-of-year statistics. I try to read the SQL in the .pl as best as I can, but it would be great if we could describe what each option in each wizard does in the manual. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 33793] New: Add method to define limited access to run reports
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33793 Bug ID: 33793 Summary: Add method to define limited access to run reports Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrewfh(a)dubcolib.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently a user with the execute_reports permission can run any report in the system. A library may wish for a given user to be able run some reports but not others. It would be great to have a mechanism for allowing limited reports access. Maybe something akin to the SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing preference? We could create ReportGroupsToAllowForRestrictedExecution, in which one selects groups of reports. We add a new execute_reports_restricted permission. A user with that permission can only run reports in the groups specified in the preference. Or maybe ditch the system preference and add a "restricted access" flag to each report? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 32610] New: Add ability to specify patron attribute as a date and apply flatpickr
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32610 Bug ID: 32610 Summary: Add ability to specify patron attribute as a date and apply flatpickr Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Sometimes libraries use patron extended attributes that are dates. It would be handy if we could specify that a particular attribute is a date and then have it become a flatpickr instance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 94

[Bug 34301] New: Agreements_spec.ts is failing randomly
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jun '25

19 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34301 Bug ID: 34301 Summary: Agreements_spec.ts is failing randomly Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 25551 koha_1 | Running: ERM/Agreements_spec.ts (1 of 6) koha_1 | [11894:0713/195038.469535:ERROR:cert_verify_proc_builtin.cc(681)] CertVerifyProcBuiltin for redirector.gvt1.com failed: koha_1 | ----- Certificate i=0 (OU=Cypress Proxy Server Certificate,O=Cypress Proxy CA,L=Internet,ST=Internet,C=Internet,CN=redirector.gvt1.com) ----- koha_1 | ERROR: No matching issuer found koha_1 | koha_1 | koha_1 | [11894:0713/195039.293777:ERROR:cert_verify_proc_builtin.cc(681)] CertVerifyProcBuiltin for r2---sn-4g5ednsd.gvt1.com failed: koha_1 | ----- Certificate i=0 (OU=Cypress Proxy Server Certificate,O=Cypress Proxy CA,L=Internet,ST=Internet,C=Internet,CN=r2---sn-4g5ednsd.gvt1.com) ----- koha_1 | ERROR: No matching issuer found koha_1 | koha_1 | koha_1 | Browserslist: caniuse-lite is outdated. Please run: koha_1 | npx browserslist@latest --update-db koha_1 | koha_1 | Why you should do it regularly: koha_1 | https://github.com/browserslist/browserslist#browsers-data-updating koha_1 | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> koha_1 | <testsuites name="Mocha Tests" time="38.2310" tests="5" failures="1"> koha_1 | <testsuite name="Root Suite" timestamp="2023-07-13T19:50:41" tests="0" file="t/cypress/integration/ERM/Agreements_spec.ts" time="0.0000" failures="0"> koha_1 | </testsuite> koha_1 | <testsuite name="Agreement CRUD operations" timestamp="2023-07-13T19:50:41" tests="5" time="38.2310" failures="1"> koha_1 | <testcase name="Agreement CRUD operations List agreements" time="11.1430" classname="List agreements"> koha_1 | </testcase> koha_1 | <testcase name="Agreement CRUD operations Add agreement" time="15.8900" classname="Add agreement"> koha_1 | </testcase> koha_1 | <testcase name="Agreement CRUD operations Edit agreement" time="0.0000" classname="Edit agreement"> koha_1 | <failure message="Timed out retrying after 5000ms: `cy.wait()` timed out waiting `5000ms` for the 1st request to the route: `get-single-agreement-search-result`. No request ever occurred. koha_1 | koha_1 | https://on.cypress.io/wait" type="CypressError"><![CDATA[CypressError: Timed out retrying after 5000ms: `cy.wait()` timed out waiting `5000ms` for the 1st request to the route: `get-single-agreement-search-result`. No request ever occurred. koha_1 | koha_1 | https://on.cypress.io/wait koha_1 | at cypressErr (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Object.errByPath (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at checkForXhr (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:… koha_1 | at tryCatcher (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Function.Promise.attempt.Promise.try (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at whenStable (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:… koha_1 | at tryCatcher (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Promise._settlePromiseFromHandler (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Promise._settlePromise (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Promise._settlePromise0 (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Promise._settlePromises (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Promise._fulfill (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:… koha_1 | From Your Spec Code: koha_1 | at Context.eval (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/tests?p=t/cypress/integra…)></failure> koha_1 | </testcase> koha_1 | <testcase name="Agreement CRUD operations Show agreement" time="6.0050" classname="Show agreement"> koha_1 | </testcase> koha_1 | <testcase name="Agreement CRUD operations Delete agreement" time="5.1930" classname="Delete agreement"> koha_1 | </testcase> koha_1 | </testsuite> koha_1 | </testsuites> Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25551 [Bug 25551] [OMNIBUS] Some tests are failing randomly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 30254] New: New overdue fine applied to incorrectly when using "Refund lost item charge and charge new overdue fine" option in circ rules
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jun '25

19 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30254 Bug ID: 30254 Summary: New overdue fine applied to incorrectly when using "Refund lost item charge and charge new overdue fine" option in circ rules Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 23091 I've only confirmed this on 21.05. I haven't been able to replicate on master. When using the lost item fee refund feature to charge a new overdue fee when a lost item is found, Koha can end up creating an overdue fine on a patron who never actually had an overdue item. To recreate: - set Lost item fee refund on return policy to "Refund lost item charge and charge new overdue fine" - have an itemtype / patron combo that charges an overdue fine - check item out to patron and then right back in again - confirm patron doesn't have a fine because the item was not late - set the item to Missing - wait until after the item's due date from your previous checkout - check the item out to a new patron - confirm your original patron now has a fine When the item is checked out and Koha clears its missing status, it looks back for the most recent checkout in old_issues and generates an overdue fine as if that item had been checked out the whole time. Even though this item wasn't lost by a patron and the first patron never had an overdue fine on it. Things get more confusing if the first patron is anonymizing their reading history, as then the fine ends up on the anonymous borrower. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23091 [Bug 23091] Add options to charge new or restore forgiven overdues when a lost item is returned -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 38

[Bug 21935] New: Setup sip accounts through front end
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Jun '25

18 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21935 Bug ID: 21935 Summary: Setup sip accounts through front end Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: SIP2 Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com Currently, it is necessary to setup an account in Koha for a sip connection and then do some setup for the same account on the backend (I do not know all the details). It would be great if there were a way to setup sip accounts via the patron account, that would eliminate the need to monkey with stuff on the backend. Ideally, it would be nice to have an area to setup sip accounts that is separate from regular patron accounts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 34784] New: Add ability to populate empty item callnumbers for a record based on the itemcallnumber syspref
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Jun '25

18 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34784 Bug ID: 34784 Summary: Add ability to populate empty item callnumbers for a record based on the itemcallnumber syspref Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Some libraries would like to auto-populate item callnumbers for items on a record based on the system preference "itemcallnumber". Only items with empty callnumbers would affected. This would add a button "Populate empty item callnumbers" on catalogue/detail.pl, as well as a "Populate callnumber" button for each line in the holdings table to set the callnumber for that specific item. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 67

[Bug 36600] New: Add ability to print an import report
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jun '25

17 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36600 Bug ID: 36600 Summary: Add ability to print an import report Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: esther.melander(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl It would be nice to have an option to print/export an import report. It could contain the information that appears on the screen and other useful types of information. For example bug 21272 reports a data error about mismatched library codes. Other data issues should be able to be retained and reported on as well. A report could include: Job ID File name Status Progress Type Start/End times The data in the table of number of records added, ignored, replaced matching rules used, framework assigned Data error messages - such as records rejected due to data issues (missing itypes, etc.) There are probably other things. It would be nice to be able to retain some of this data when trying to troubleshoot an import failure. Right now, some of the data is lost/buried once navigating away from the screen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 29743] New: Importing bad MARC can cause internal server errors in Koha
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jun '25

17 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29743 Bug ID: 29743 Summary: Importing bad MARC can cause internal server errors in Koha Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org MARC data can be imported into Koha that may be invalid and can cause internal server errors when someone attempts to view that records. We should validate MARC data before it is imported into the database to prevent this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 34063] New: items.paidfor haunting beyond the grave
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Jun '25

16 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34063 Bug ID: 34063 Summary: items.paidfor haunting beyond the grave Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 26268 Bug 26268 only drops the column items.paidfor if the column is empty. If there is a value, a warning message is displayed, but the database upgrade completes successfully. So you may end up with 47 columns in your items table in Koha 22.11 while the deleteditems table only has 46 columns. This will cause scripts like /cgi-bin/koha/reports/issues_stats.pl to bust with a 500 error since it can't do a * union on those two tables with a different number of columns. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26268 [Bug 26268] Remove items.paid for once and for all -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 29