March 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 12270] Create a directory for templates shared with opac and intranet
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Mar '25

14 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12270 David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |dcook(a)prosentient.com.au Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 35716 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10060] Allow adding a branch parameter to the web-based self check to indicate library its used at
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10060 --- Comment #32 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Christopher Brannon from comment #30) > I would love to see this happen. We've moved over to Koha's self check out > and we are losing stats because of it. Something like this should have > happened years ago. We noted this problem in 2012 when we started with Koha. > > This is a annoying limitation for consortiums. Agreed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10060] Allow adding a branch parameter to the web-based self check to indicate library its used at
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10060 --- Comment #31 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- When I have a moment, I'll take a look at my local code again. While we have a solution that works well for our multi-branch libraries, I doubt the Koha community will accept our code as is. But I can share what we've got, and collaborate with folk to make a community acceptable version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10060] Allow adding a branch parameter to the web-based self check to indicate library its used at
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10060 --- Comment #30 from Christopher Brannon <cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org> --- I would love to see this happen. We've moved over to Koha's self check out and we are losing stats because of it. Something like this should have happened years ago. We noted this problem in 2012 when we started with Koha. This is a annoying limitation for consortiums. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 22531] New: Allow for multiple requests to partners and display partners in audit log
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22531 Bug ID: 22531 Summary: Allow for multiple requests to partners and display partners in audit log Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew.isherwood(a)ptfs-europe.com Target Milestone: --- Currently, when an ILL request is sent to partners it is not possible to send to further partners, should the first partner not be able to fulfil the request. A better approach would be to allow the "Place request with partners" option to be selected even when this action has already taken place. This will allow the user to try multiple partners subsequently. As such, we should log which partners a request has been sent to and this information should be displayed in the "Display request log" functionality added in Bug 20750 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 54

[Bug 39057] New: Add additional fields to ILL requests
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39057 Bug ID: 39057 Summary: Add additional fields to ILL requests Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mathsabypro(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com, tomascohen(a)gmail.com There is currently a kind of additional fields for ILL request, but it can be different for each request. This is not the behavior we have elsewhere in Koha. A library should have the ability to define additional fields in /admin/additional-fields.pl with the same options as ERM additional fields (searchable or not, repeatable, linked to a authorized value...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 38817] New: JS error when viewing subfield structure
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38817 Bug ID: 38817 Summary: JS error when viewing subfield structure Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Noticed when testing something else. Uncaught Sortable: `el` must be an HTMLElement, not [object Undefined] To recreate: 1. Go to Administration > MARC bibliographic framework 2. Pick any framework and MARC structure 3. Pick any subfield and View subfield Notice the console error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 27444] New: Allow reports to use the calendar to count open/closed days based on the calendar
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27444 Bug ID: 27444 Summary: Allow reports to use the calendar to count open/closed days based on the calendar Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When writing reports related to fines or overdue notices, one runs into difficulties based on how Koha holidays are stored. There's no good way for SQL to calculate out how many days within a given span were open days. So if you're using the calendar to calculate when to send overdue notices at 10 open days past the due date, there's no way to get SQL to tell you which items should have gotten an overdue notice today. This becomes more of an issue as we use the patron emailer more, since the patron emailer relies upon a report. If one wanted to use the patron emailer to send a fourth overdue notice, one would not be able to calculate when to send that notice using the Koha calendar. I'm not sure what the solution is here. Maybe some syntax one could use in a report to ask Koha to generate a value? So you could say something like: WHERE timestampdiff(days,date_due,curdate()) = <<opendays:date_due,curdate()>> ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 37280] New: Add a direct link to Stage MARC records from ERM Titles
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37280 Bug ID: 37280 Summary: Add a direct link to Stage MARC records from ERM Titles Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ERM Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com Reporter: esther.melander(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com, jonathan.field(a)ptfs-europe.com, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com, pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com A bulk upload of local titles into the ERM is a bit cumbersome and requires importing titles through Stage MARC records, creating a list from Biblio numbers of the imported titles, and adding the list into titles. It would be far simpler to have a direct link to Stage MARC records to pull the titles into Koha and the ERM. Perhaps similar to the process in Acquisitions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 38878] New: overlap of periods in Agreements should be forbidden
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38878 Bug ID: 38878 Summary: overlap of periods in Agreements should be forbidden Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ERM Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com Reporter: mathsabypro(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com, jonathan.field(a)ptfs-europe.com, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com, pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com For an agreement you can define 2 periods which overlaps. This should not be allowed, and koha should have a way to detect the "current" period (and ideally display separately) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2