April 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 30723] New: Allow for notices to have custom header/footer includes
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 May '25

09 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30723 Bug ID: 30723 Summary: Allow for notices to have custom header/footer includes Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Some libraries like to add the same custom header/footer to many notices/slips. It would be handy if there was a way to set a custom header/footer and then call on it in each notice/slip where you'd like to have them. That way you would not have to add the same header/footer content to each notice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 39527] New: Cannot create a new notice when running Koha as a Mojolicious application
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 May '25

09 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39527 Bug ID: 39527 Summary: Cannot create a new notice when running Koha as a Mojolicious application Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com Reporter: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When running Koha as a mojolicious application, trying to create a new notice results in a CSRF error, because two different 'op' parameters are sent (one in the URL, one in the POST body) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 27730] New: Innocent changes to framework silently delete bibliographic data
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 May '25

09 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27730 Bug ID: 27730 Summary: Innocent changes to framework silently delete bibliographic data Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 19.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: ian.bays(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl If you copy and change a framework and either delete a subfield in the new framework or mark the subfield tab as "ignore", then any bib data with data in that subfield, when saved in the new framework will be silently destroyed with no option to undo. Test Plan to confirm behaviour: 1. Create bib record in default framework with minimal data, but add tag 365 (as it has a number of subfields all visible) and populate subfields a through h with "fa" through "fh". Save the record and with sql check the contents of the metadata. (I found this SQL gives enough information substituting the correct bib number of the saved record: select tagfield, tagsubfield, frameworkcode, tab, hidden, (select ExtractValue(metadata, '//datafield[@tag="365"]/subfield[@code>="a"]') from biblio_metadata where biblionumber = 37002 and (select frameworkcode from biblio where biblionumber = 37002) = marc_subfield_structure.frameworkcode) tv from marc_subfield_structure where frameworkcode in ('', 'TEST') and tagfield = '365'; ) 2. Copy the default framework to a TEST framework and set (say 365$b to tab ignore and delete 365$d). (I used export the default framework to a csv, create new TEST framework and import from the saved default csv) 3. Edit the bib record and change framework to TEST framework (settings > change framework) and save the record. 4. Run the SQL again and observe the data from subfields b and d have both disappeared from the metadata. If you were to rerun these tests you may need to reload memcache to ensure the newly changed frameworks are picked up. I understand it has been broadly known by some long-term Koha users that deleting a subfield from the framework has this effect, but both these situations potentially cause bib data to be silently and permanently delated from the database. Many users will be unaware and may not discover the problem for some time. Potential solutions might include: a) For subfields not in the framework or with tab "ignore" allow the data to be saved as is on saving for edit; b) When selecting "change framework" detect if data would be lost and alert the user with an option to back out of the change without losing data; c) Do not allow deletion of a subfield from a framework and do not allow the "ignore" option for the tab. If a field is to be ignored but hidden there are plenty of visibility options in the framework. NB: The current delivered default framework has 13 subfields set to the "ignore" tab. I cannot see what purpose these serve as no data can survive within them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 35581] New: ILL Koha classes are not consistent
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 May '25

08 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35581 Bug ID: 35581 Summary: ILL Koha classes are not consistent Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 127

[Bug 35083] New: Koha::Illbatchstatus should be kosher
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 May '25

08 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35083 Bug ID: 35083 Summary: Koha::Illbatchstatus should be kosher Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The following methods should just be overloading their counterparts and follow what we do everywhere else: * create_and_log => overloaded store * update_and_log => overloaded store * delete_and_log => overloaded delete Also, tests need to be placed in t/db_dependent/Koha/Illbatchstatus.t -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 35082] New: Koha::Illbatch should be kosher
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 May '25

08 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35082 Bug ID: 35082 Summary: Koha::Illbatch should be kosher Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The following methods should just be overloading their counterparts and follow what we do everywhere else: * create_and_log => overloaded store * update_and_log => overloaded store * delete_and_log => overloaded delete Also, tests need to be placed in t/db_dependent/Koha/Illbatch.t -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 39668] New: Add option to show/hide inactive vendors by default on acqui/booksellers.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 May '25

08 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39668 Bug ID: 39668 Summary: Add option to show/hide inactive vendors by default on acqui/booksellers.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org On acqui/booksellers.pl if you have inactive vendors, they show by default. Some would like an option to hide the inactive vendors by default with the option to toggle/display inactive ones. Maybe we don't a sys pref. Use localStorage maybe? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 26500] New: Automatic renewals show incorrect count of renewals allowed when CircControl is set to "the library you're logged in at"
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 May '25

08 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26500 Bug ID: 26500 Summary: Automatic renewals show incorrect count of renewals allowed when CircControl is set to "the library you're logged in at" Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When CircControl is set to "the library you're logged in at," the Renew column in the patron checkouts table will show the count of permitted renewals based on the library you're logged in at. This is correct for manual renewals, since those are the rules that will be enforced. However, for automatic renewals this can mean we're showing the user an incorrect number. To recreate: - Create an All Libraries rule that allows 10 renewals - Create a rule for branch A that allows 1 renewal - Creare a rule for branch B that allows 99 renewals - Check an item out from Branch A, set to auto-renew - While logged in as Branch A, confirm Koha tells you you have 1 renewal available - Log in as Branch B, see you have 99 renewals - Log in as Branch C, see you have 10 renewals - Set No Renewal Before to allow renewal immediately - run the auto_renew cron, item renews once - run the auto-renew cron again, confirm too_many error because only 1 renewal is allowed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 37995] New: (Bug 29948 follow-up) Make display author information more configurable
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 May '25

08 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37995 Bug ID: 37995 Summary: (Bug 29948 follow-up) Make display author information more configurable Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: januszop(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 29948 There is a problem with displaying author's identifiers while OPACAuthorIdentifiersAndInformation is on for 024$2$a. At the current, the list of identifiers source is closed and hardcoded. So if it happens that in an authority record a 024 field exists with $2 from outside the list (like wikidata or other from the official list https://www.loc.gov/standards/sourcelist/standard-identifier.html) an empty bullet with no information is being displayed. This could be corrected either by filtering out the 024 fields in Koha::Authority::get_identifiers_and_information, or by correcting the template (authority-information.inc). However, this would only be a halfway solution. A more appropriate solution might be to introduce a sub-preference containing the triplets: source code ($2), label, URI prefix. E.g.: wikidata, Wikidata, http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/ Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29948 [Bug 29948] Display author information for researchers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 39645] New: Prevent duplicate overdue fines if an item is renewed and new due date is overdue
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 May '25

07 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39645 Bug ID: 39645 Summary: Prevent duplicate overdue fines if an item is renewed and new due date is overdue Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: alyssa.drake(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If an item is overdue when it is renewed, and the new due date is also overdue, Koha should take into account the period of time in which overdue fines were already charged and not assess duplicate fines. This happens in libraries that charge overdue fines, renews items based on original check out date, and allows auto renewing on overdue items. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6