February 2026 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 34808] New: Batch Patron Modification Tool - Select all / clear all does not select/clear all
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '26

14 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34808 Bug ID: 34808 Summary: Batch Patron Modification Tool - Select all / clear all does not select/clear all Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: Laura.escamilla(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org To recreate: 1. Open the Batch Patron Modification Tool 2. Insert or open a file with 25+ card numbers or borrower numbers to modify then click on continue. 3. Notice that there are 2 or more pages of entries showing. If you click on clear all, it will only clear entries 1-20 but not anything on the second page (21-...). Similarly if you clear both pages and try to select all, it will only select the entries on the page you are viewing. It would useful if the select all/clear all worked on all entries. Especially for libraries that are modifying hundreds of patrons. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 41913] New: Batch patron modification only affects on patrons that are visible in the tool
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '26

14 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41913 Bug ID: 41913 Summary: Batch patron modification only affects on patrons that are visible in the tool Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: anni.maki-mantila(a)turku.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If patrons are divided to several pages in batch patron modification -tool, Koha makes the modification only to those patrons that are visible on the first page. The modification should affect on every patron that has been brought to the modification tool, regardless of how many patrons are shown per page. In version 24.05 this has worked properly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 41407] New: OPAC hold history sorts newest to oldest but hides newest to limit to 50
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '26

14 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41407 Bug ID: 41407 Summary: OPAC hold history sorts newest to oldest but hides newest to limit to 50 Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: lisette(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Sort of hold history on the opac is unintuitive. It seems like if it's sorting newest to oldest, it should show the 50 newest holds, not active holds then oldest->newest holds until 50. To recreate on main: 1. Allow to override holds in system preferences 2. Allow borrowers to see HoldHistory in the OPAC 3. place at least 51 holds for a single patron. 4. Backdate some of the hold dates to past days, set one of them to be newer than the rest. 5. log in as that patron on the OPAC 6. Go to the holds history 7. observe the 50 holds and see that your newest one doesn't show 8. click the link to view all and see your newst one does show. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 39813] New: z3950_responder.pl needs support for authentication
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '26

14 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39813 Bug ID: 39813 Summary: z3950_responder.pl needs support for authentication Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Z39.50 / SRU / OpenSearch Servers Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl At the moment, z3950_responder.pl only provides anonymous access via Z39.50. That means if you want to restrict your Z39.50 endpoint using a username and password, you're forced to use Zebra. If z3950_responder.pl had support for authentication, then it would be one more nail in the coffin for Zebra, as you wouldn't need Zebra for that use case anymore. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 39418] New: RDA Carrier, Content, & Media Vocabularies
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '26

13 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39418 Bug ID: 39418 Summary: RDA Carrier, Content, & Media Vocabularies Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: ephetteplace(a)cca.edu QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl On our Koha, we've loaded the RDA vocabularies for MARC 336 Content, 337 Media, and 338 Carrier into our authorized values in order to connect them with the $a and $b subfields of those fields in our MARC frameworks. This bug would preload these vocabularies for new instances of Koha. There are two AV categories per field, one for the human-readable term ($a) and one for a short code ($b). I made the lib/lib_opac text for the codes the term they represent, so one does not have to memorize the meanings of the codes. I do not see any instance of an authorized value being connected with a MARC field during installation (looking in installer/data/mysql/en/marcflavour/marc21/mandatory/marc21_framework_DEFAULT.yml where all the authorised_value properties are empty) so I have not done so with these either. That seems reasonable; some libraries may want to use different terms. But the RDA vocabs are widely used and stable, so including them as an option for catalogers is worthwhile. To load these into an existing Koha instance, this is the SQL we used: https://github.com/phette23/scrape_rda_vocabs/blob/main/koha.sql -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 59

[Bug 34597] New: Expired patrons can still place ILL requests through OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '26

13 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34597 Bug ID: 34597 Summary: Expired patrons can still place ILL requests through OPAC Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com CC: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de, magnus(a)libriotech.no, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, nick(a)bywatersolutions.com, pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com, tomascohen(a)gmail.com Noticed this, not sure if very severe or not. But I wonder if placing an ILL request should be included in BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions. To reproduce, on k-t-d: 1) Enable ILLmodule and install FreeForm, run: bash <(curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ammopt/koha-ill-dev/master/start-ill-dev.…) 2) Make koha/koha user expired, run mysql-kohadev: update borrowers set dateexpiry = '2020-12-31' where borrowernumber=51; 3) Visit OPAC/cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl and verify there's a user expired notification 4) Visit OPAC/cgi-bin/koha/opac-illrequests.pl and create a new ILL request 5) It's created with no issue -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 53

[Bug 25465] New: Batch delete records based on imported MARC batch
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '26

13 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25465 Bug ID: 25465 Summary: Batch delete records based on imported MARC batch Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Various vendors send libraries batches of MARC records for deletion -- these are records the library already has in their system that should be deleted as the vendor no longer offers them. Right now we can: - stage the batch for import using a matching rule - run a report to return matched biblionumbers - batch delete based on the report output It'd be great to streamline this. My two thoughts are either we could add a new option to batch record deletion to allow use of an imported file to identify records OR we could add a new matching behavior of "delete matched record" to the batch staging tool. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 41162] New: Warn that printing large barcode ranges can lead to running out of memory
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '26

13 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41162 Bug ID: 41162 Summary: Warn that printing large barcode ranges can lead to running out of memory Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: philip.orr(a)lmscloud.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If you are using the barcode range option in the label creator, if your barcode range is too large, your Koha server may run out of memory before the process finishes. This causes out of memory errors. This could happen if a library had e.g. "100101223" as their last used barcode and they wanted to print the next 50 barcodes and they make a mistake while entering the "To:" field in the barcode range creator. From: 100101224 To: 1000101274 You could very easily accidentally cause the label-create.pl process to create insane amounts of barcodes. In this case 900 million barcodes would be created, if my math is right. :) The memory usage will slowly increase as barcodes are created and "eventually" there will be no more memory left, causing OOM killer to strike. We should at least warn in the barcode range creation tool that such problems can happen if you aren't careful while entering values. I don't know if there's a good way to stop users from entering too large ranges, maybe there is a valid use case for a large barcode range if you have enough memory. To reproduce (assuming you are on ktd): 1. Check your current memory usage, e.g. with "ps aux --sort -rss" (or "free -h" to see how much memory is still free) 2. Make sure you know how to kill a process in Debian, e.g. "killall -9 /kohadevbox/koha/labels/label-create-pdf.pl" - you will need it soon.. 3. Go to Cataloging -> Label Creator -> Print barcode range 4. Enter in a number in "From:" and a crazy high number in "To:"; see above for an example 5. Print range -> Export (doesn't matter which templates etc.) -> Click on "Download as PDF" 5. Check your memory usage again, it should start spiking over the next minutes. The guilty process should be /kohadevbox/koha/labels/label-create-pdf.pl (assuming you are on ktd). 6. Either kill the process or you will run out of memory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 38003] New: Add a system preference to configure which patrons fields are used for brief info
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '26

13 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38003 Bug ID: 38003 Summary: Add a system preference to configure which patrons fields are used for brief info Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: philip.orr(a)lmscloud.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com In patron accounts, there is always a brief info area at the top left containing the most important patron data (like name, address, category... etc.) It would be nice to be able to configure which patron fields are used for this brief info area. At the moment it is only possible using system preference HidePersonalPatronDetailOnCirculation to hide all personal fields from the brief info area. But some libraries might want to add more info to the area, or remove only some select fields. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 23682] New: Add ability to manually import EDI invoices as an alternative to automatic importing on download
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '26

13 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23682 Bug ID: 23682 Summary: Add ability to manually import EDI invoices as an alternative to automatic importing on download Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Some library would like to delay the importing of invoices until a time of their choosing. The invoices should be imported into the database as they do now, but the invoice processing should be skipped. Instead, any invoice file with a status of 'new' should have an 'Import' button to process the invoice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 32