June 2026 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 42239] New: Extended loan renewals
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42239 Bug ID: 42239 Summary: Extended loan renewals Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: performance Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: natasha.jones(a)westsussex.gov.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com Renewing an item with a specific date on the same date the item has been renewed (e.g. for holiday loan) does not work on Koha. This can be done the day after renewal though. For example, a customer renews their items online but sees the return date is when they are away. They contact the library on the same day to extend the loan further to a specific date. Koha doesn't allow staff to extend this renewal as it has already been renewed that day. It can be renewed from the following day though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 42001] New: Add duplicate purchase order number detection on EDI quote import
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42001 Bug ID: 42001 Summary: Add duplicate purchase order number detection on EDI quote import Initiative type: --- Sponsorship Sponsored status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)openfifth.co.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: hdunne-howrie(a)westminster.gov.uk, kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com, testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 40383, 41297 Blocks: 38195 EDIFACT quote processing will detect duplicate purchase order numbers and block basket creation from those orders when using the po_is_basketname setting for EDIfact processing. We should add the ability to notify the supplier, and alert library staff. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38195 [Bug 38195] EDI/Edifact classes should use Koha::Objects instead of plain DBIC https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40383 [Bug 40383] Modernise the EDIFACT Message display modal https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41297 [Bug 41297] Add duplicate invoice number detection on EDI invoice import -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 56

[Bug 37201] New: Add a syspref to allow or not a checkout if a expired booking exists for the same patron
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37201 Bug ID: 37201 Summary: Add a syspref to allow or not a checkout if a expired booking exists for the same patron Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: thibaud.guillot(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Hello :) I've worked on a way to prevent checkout to patron if this same patron has a booking expired for the same item.. I think it's a setting that might not suit everyone, so I've introduced a new system preference. I'll put my patch in place and await your comments. Thanks ^^ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 21

[Bug 22972] New: Proposal for enriching the bibliographic records with standard identifiers from authority data
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22972 Bug ID: 22972 Summary: Proposal for enriching the bibliographic records with standard identifiers from authority data Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: januszop(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Thinking in terms of linked data, it would be of profit to have as much of standard identifiers in the bibliographic data produced by the library as possible. Libraries use authority data coming from official sources (like LoC, SUDOC, etc.) or enrich their locally created authority records with standard identifiers (e.g. viafId, ISNI, Wikipedia). This information is linked to the bibliographic record by the Koha-specific subfield $9 which is illegal in terms of MARC 21 and does not mean anything outside of the local Koha ecosystem. A record moved out of a local Koha catalogue (downloaded, exported) loses the linked-data connection to other objects (like authors, subjects etc.), which are then identified only by strings. To make this connection between bibliographic access point and objects identified by universal identifiers more permanent outside of the local environment, the standard MARC 21 $0 subfield could be used. (UNIMARC has to be examined - $3 subfield?) The required changes would include at least: C4::AuthoritiesMarc::merge function, the authority plugin, some new system preferences, optionally display templates and also a script to update the existing biblio records. New possible system preferences needed: - switch the feature on/off - source of the standard IDs (possibly different for different biblio fields?) (standard in MARC 21 authority: 024, but may be also 010/035) (a list) - how many ids should be copied (= how may $0 added): only the first found or all of them - if an extra link/icon should be generated in display (OPAC / librarian) Please, share your comments about this idea. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 45

[Bug 37363] New: Booking dates should respect closed days
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37363 Bug ID: 37363 Summary: Booking dates should respect closed days Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com The bookings datepicker is not aware of open/closed days at present and as such a booking may be made that would expect fulfilment or return on a closed day. We should update the flatpickr to disable such dates for direct selection, but allow spanning them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 20

[Bug 42332] New: Remove conditional TT tags from tables thead
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42332 Bug ID: 42332 Summary: Remove conditional TT tags from tables thead Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff interface Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Depends on: 41604 Tables that are configurable (admin/columns_settings.pl) cannot have conditional TT tags in their thead. The same number of columns must always be in the DOM when DataTables is initialized. Then we hide the column in the JS part. This depends on the visibility_condition flag added by bug 41604. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41604 [Bug 41604] Impossible to hide Checkin column in issues-table in circ/circulation.pl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 169

[Bug 40284] New: MARC21: Adjust maxlength for 005, 006 and 007
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40284 Bug ID: 40284 Summary: MARC21: Adjust maxlength for 005, 006 and 007 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Field 000 (leader) and 008 are controlled with maxlength. This should be since version 3.07.00.037, although my production database somehow did not have 40 for field 008.. We can easily add the same check for 005, 006 and 007. Note that 007 does not always have the same length, depends on position 0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 23

[Bug 28633] New: Add a preferred_name field and an effective_name method to patrons
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28633 Bug ID: 28633 Summary: Add a preferred_name field and an effective_name method to patrons Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Some institutions store legal names in their directories and for patron imports, but would also like to be able to record 'preferred' names in the patro records. It would be nice to have a field for preferred_name and a method to select the preferred name when it exists, and the firstname when it doesn't Following the item we would suggest 'effective_name' - the additional method can be used in patron-title.inc and in notices to simplify name choice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 195

[Bug 36453] New: BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions should allow multiple actions options
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36453 Bug ID: 36453 Summary: BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions should allow multiple actions options Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 34597 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34597 [Bug 34597] Expired patrons can still place ILL requests through OPAC -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 80

[Bug 42548] New: Add possibility to list multiple barcodes or one biblionumber on attach item action
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42548 Bug ID: 42548 Summary: Add possibility to list multiple barcodes or one biblionumber on attach item action Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: thibaud.guillot(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Hello When you want to attach items on biblio record it will be useful to add a list of barcodes or a biblionumber (if you want to attacn all items in one shot). So this patch will introduce this feature, I will add bug 6532 and 42451 dependants cause I added a method to move all items in a batch and this patch adds refactoring of this to prevent duplicate code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 18