- Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 22157] New: HideLostItems items still show in OPAC when patron places a hold on a specific item
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jan '22

14 Jan '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22157 Bug ID: 22157 Summary: HideLostItems items still show in OPAC when patron places a hold on a specific item Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- If a library has the system preference set to HIDE lost items, the item will still show up in the holds screen when a patron places a hold on a specific item These items should not appear within the OPAC as they should be hidden per this system preference. This bug is similar to 15448 where the system preference OPAChiddenItems is performing the same way. This might have some correlation with bug 2711. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 29491] New: Improve display of notices in patron details
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jan '22

14 Jan '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29491 Bug ID: 29491 Summary: Improve display of notices in patron details Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The display of notices in a patrons record could be improved.. the display box seems to be unnecessarily narrow and I can't tell if HTML formatting is being fully applied. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 29856] New: Make the ES config more flexible
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jan '22

14 Jan '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29856 Bug ID: 29856 Summary: Make the ES config more flexible Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com I need to add a 'request_timeout' entry to the ES configuration to fix some timeout problems on the sandboxes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 29391] New: Improve output of reservoir search
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jan '22

14 Jan '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29391 Bug ID: 29391 Summary: Improve output of reservoir search Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl I'd like to make three changes to the output of search results from the bibliographic reservoir: - Make it a configurable DataTable. - Remove unused columns: the date and edition columns are not in the query so will never have data. - Add a column for import date. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 22153] New: Automatic item modifications by age: Boolean options
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jan '22

14 Jan '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22153 Bug ID: 22153 Summary: Automatic item modifications by age: Boolean options Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: chris.kirby(a)ilsleypubliclibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Automatic item modifications by age is limited to boolean '='. There is NOT a boolean '!=' or even a boolean OR. Having boolean NOT EQUAL and OR would make "Automatic item modifications by age" much more useful. In consortium settings, this enhancement would allow branches to opt out of aging set for the rest of the consortium. For example, it would be possible to set a rule such as the following: For example, "Age in days x days items.itype = itypename AND items.homebranch != branch name items.itype = itypename" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 26296] New: Use new table column selection modal for OPAC suggestion fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jan '22

14 Jan '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26296 Bug ID: 26296 Summary: Use new table column selection modal for OPAC suggestion fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: lisetteslatah(a)gmail.com, lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com, testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 23420 We can use the same modal-style selection process for choosing columns to be included in OPACSuggestionUnwantedFields and OPACSuggestionMandatoryFields. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23420 [Bug 23420] Add "SuggestionsUnwantedFields" to hide fields from the suggestions form -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 38

[Bug 7374] Add remote image option for authorized values
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jan '22

14 Jan '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7374 Owen Leonard <oleonard(a)myacpl.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff --- Comment #16 from Owen Leonard <oleonard(a)myacpl.org> --- I've tested this again in my local test system and I can't reproduce that problem. I wonder if it could be an issue with the sandbox? I'm going to put this back to "Needs signoff" in the hopes that someone can try again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11873] Upgrade jstree jQuery plugin to the latest version
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jan '22

14 Jan '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11873 --- Comment #5 from Eugene Espinoza <eugenegf(a)yahoo.com> --- I am trying this out in the Koha sandboxes, it seems the patches are not being applied when I check in the git.log. I tried various combinations. I tried for Enter repository url: https://gitlab.com/koha-dev/koha-dev https://gitlab.com/koha-dev/koha-dev/-/tree/bug-11783-upgrade-jstree https://gitlab.com/koha-dev/koha-dev.git And for branch, either "bug-11783-upgrade-jstree" or "https://gitlab.com/koha-dev/koha-dev/-/tree/bug-11783-upgrade-jstree". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 4269] Module DBD::SQLite2 requirement will cause problems
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jan '22

14 Jan '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=4269 Mason James <mtj(a)kohaaloha.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=29881 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 7374] Add remote image option for authorized values
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Jan '22

13 Jan '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7374 Christopher Brannon <cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |Failed QA --- Comment #15 from Christopher Brannon <cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org> --- I'm testing on a sandbox, and before I add the patch, everything work right. But when I add the patch, if I try to edit an existing CCODE, it acts like it is creating a new value instead of editing the existing one. All fields are blank. This patch is messing with existing functionality. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0