- Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 12224] Allow easy printing of patron check-in slip
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12224 --- Comment #51 from Aleisha Amohia <aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz> --- (In reply to Emmi Takkinen from comment #50) > Followed test plan(s), "Print checkin slip" buttons work and new window is > opened for printing. However list of checked in items isn't printed. Hi Emmi, the list of checked in items does print for me, can you please let me know what steps you're taking? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11257] Document <<items.content>> for duedgst and preduedgst and update sample notices
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11257 --- Comment #8 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #7) > I think the idea was to change the sample notice text to make it read more > similar to the existing other notices and add some more information about > the items which can be done using the items.content placeholder. > > Not sure if we should/could just switch them over to TT syntax instead? Yeah could probably do that too. It's not something I'm planning on working on but I raised that (duplicate) bug as I went to update an existing install the other day and was surprised at how the PREDUEDGST sample was not usable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 12430] Relevance ranking should also be used without QueryWeightFields system preference
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12430 Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version(s)|21.05.00,20.11.01 |21.05.00,20.11.01,20.05.07 released in| | CC| |andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com Status|Pushed to stable |Pushed to oldstable --- Comment #90 from Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- Pushed to 20.05.x for 20.05.07 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 27030] New: The new "Processing" hold status is missing in C4::Reserves module documentation
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27030 Bug ID: 27030 Summary: The new "Processing" hold status is missing in C4::Reserves module documentation Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: josef.moravec(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 22145] New: Add a syspref to hide the 'rows per page' dropdown when running a report
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22145 Bug ID: 22145 Summary: Add a syspref to hide the 'rows per page' dropdown when running a report Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- When your report has very few results, this dropdown just takes up space. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 27128] New: Follow-up to bug 25728 - Don't prefill av's code
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27128 Bug ID: 27128 Summary: Follow-up to bug 25728 - Don't prefill av's code Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Bug 25728 patch "Don't prefill av's code" does not work. Calling empty val() retruns the attribut. Should be val(''). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 14007] Item Types for items hidden by OpacHiddenItems turn up in facet results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14007 --- Comment #10 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #9) > I wonder if the options of "exceptions" are not already a "killer" for the > index idea - making things more complicated :( Nah, you would use one query/index or the other depending on that context, which is a mix of settings and the logged-in user category and interface. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14007] Item Types for items hidden by OpacHiddenItems turn up in facet results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14007 --- Comment #9 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- I wonder if the options of "exceptions" are not already a "killer" for the index idea - making things more complicated :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 14007] Item Types for items hidden by OpacHiddenItems turn up in facet results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14007 --- Comment #8 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #7) > Would this be just like 2 different itemtype indexes? or "full" index? > I think the first might be a good solution, but the opachiddenitems is > currently a dymanic setting that works 'on the fly'. I think making new > indexes will always require a full reindex so will limit the usefulness of > the functionality a bit. > > Is there an alternative solution where we could filter those from search > dynamically? I guess we could build smarter searches based on the context information (OpacHiddenItems, patron category, etc). It would be a not-so-simple development, but of course doable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 14007] Item Types for items hidden by OpacHiddenItems turn up in facet results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14007 --- Comment #7 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Would this be just like 2 different itemtype indexes? or "full" index? I think the first might be a good solution, but the opachiddenitems is currently a dymanic setting that works 'on the fly'. I think making new indexes will always require a full reindex so will limit the usefulness of the functionality a bit. Is there an alternative solution where we could filter those from search dynamically? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0