- Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 14669] Search orders by managing library
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '19

03 Jun '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14669 Liz Rea <wizzyrea(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |Failed QA CC| |wizzyrea(a)gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Liz Rea <wizzyrea(a)gmail.com> --- Hi Katrin, This works but it has a QA tool failure that I don't understand because it seems to be set up correctly: FAIL koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/includes/filter-orders.inc FAIL valid_template options_for_libraries: not found IT may be a false positive, if it is just let me know and I'll sign it off. Cheers, Liz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 5579] Remove items from biblioitems.marcxml
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '19

03 Jun '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5579 Paul Hoffman <paul(a)flo.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=23033 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 20313] New: Article requests: Can we do without the processing notice ?
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '19

03 Jun '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20313 Bug ID: 20313 Summary: Article requests: Can we do without the processing notice ? Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com For each article request we switch to processing status, Koha sends a mail to the patron. It does not tell much. The patron already received a mail that acknowledges his request; so why not send a mail only when the request has been completed? In other words: can we remove AR_PROCESSING ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 12450] Closing libraries for the summer
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '19

03 Jun '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12450 Magnus Enger <magnus(a)libriotech.no> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|magnus(a)libriotech.no |koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-commun | |ity.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 12450] Closing libraries for the summer
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '19

03 Jun '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12450 --- Comment #8 from Magnus Enger <magnus(a)libriotech.no> --- (In reply to Magnus Enger from comment #5) > (In reply to Christopher Brannon from comment #4) > > Checking to see whatever came of this. :) > > Thanks for checking! :-) I have been working on this, but I started out in > the wrong direction so things have taken longer than expected. I should probably say that I never got any useful results for this, and I am not working on it any longer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14049] Ability to add custom fields to OPAC purchase suggestion form
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Jun '19

02 Jun '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14049 --- Comment #3 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Pablo AB from comment #2) > Shouldn't always newer bugs marked duplicated of older ones, instead of the > other way around? At least unless the newer have much more info. > > Marking older bugs duplicate of newer ones give the wrong impression that > this request is recent. You are right Pablo that this is the general rule. Tbh, I was not sure if this was active and picked the other for the recent activity on it. It sure is debatable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 14049] Ability to add custom fields to OPAC purchase suggestion form
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Jun '19

02 Jun '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14049 --- Comment #2 from Pablo AB <pablo.bianchi(a)gmail.com> --- Shouldn't always newer bugs marked duplicated of older ones, instead of the other way around? At least unless the newer have much more info. Marking older bugs duplicate of newer ones give the wrong impression that this request is recent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 14242] Use ISBN-field to fill out purchase suggestions (using an Ajax-request)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Jun '19

02 Jun '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14242 --- Comment #60 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- > ..., because I doubt copyright date has meaning to users) I meant: people! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14242] Use ISBN-field to fill out purchase suggestions (using an Ajax-request)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Jun '19

02 Jun '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14242 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14242] Use ISBN-field to fill out purchase suggestions (using an Ajax-request)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Jun '19

02 Jun '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14242 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oleonard(a)myacpl.org --- Comment #59 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- First of all: I like this! Some findings while testing: 1) Use the TT Asset plugin instead: [% IF ( Koha.Preference('OPACSuggestionAutoFill') ) %] <script type="text/javascript" src="[% interface %]/[% theme %]/js/autofill.js"></script> [% END %] 2) Style question :) (non-blocker) [% IF NOT Koha.Preference( 'OPACSuggestionAutoFill' ) %] Why not UNLESS? Just hadn't seen this before! 3) The jQuery plugin Wondering about the Javascript file included here. I think right now it's the biggest issue for me. It's labelled "jquery autofill plugin", but it appears to be unrelated to the existing one or has been changed so much I am not seeing the relationship anymore: https://plugins.jquery.com/autofill/ Maybe this should be renamed as it's now a plugin dealing with the Google API specifically and no longer a generic one and the note be removed to avoid confusion? I also think that Jonathan's comment 18 is still valid. If we only need it on one page, it would make sense to only include it there. I think we also really need to figure out the license situation here. My guess right now is that Martin is the author. We don't usually add the authors/licenses for js files written for Koha that live in bootstrap/js, so maybe this is mostly about removing the confusing comment/making sure this was written for Koha and is not a general plugin. Adding Owen. 4) Pref description should mention this is about the suggestion form :) 5) It would be nice if the error message didn't appear as another button (and if the Google Search button was more clearly formatted as a button) (non-blocker)(In reply to Chris Cormack from comment #7) 6) Copyright date / Publication year > > And lastly, not a problem but a question: In my test copyright date is never > > populated. Is that a bug or a problem with Google Books' data? > > Yes, Google books API only hands back publication date, not copyright date. I think it might make sense to use this in the field. While technically not the same, we use both in Koha often for the same thing. This is one of the forms using copyright date, but in other places it will be publication year. And it all goes into the same fields when creating a record from it. The year would be helpful I think. (I'd even go as far to say we should relabel the form, because I doubt copyright date has meaning to users) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0