April 2012 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 5613] New: search by 'on order'
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Nov '14

02 Nov '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5613 Summary: search by 'on order' Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: HEAD Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Searching AssignedTo: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: nengard(a)gmail.com QAContact: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Would be great if there was a way to search for on order items (I know we can do this with CCL, I'm saying having it on the advanced search for patrons to see). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 5961] New: Acquistions: New feature to create a bunch of orders from a staged file
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 31 Oct '14

31 Oct '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5961 Bug #: 5961 Summary: Acquistions: New feature to create a bunch of orders from a staged file Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: rel_3_4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Acquisitions AssignedTo: henridamien(a)koha-fr.org ReportedBy: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz QAContact: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Blocks: 5580 (MT #4007) Filling a basket from the reservoir creating a form order to import all records from a staged file -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 7933] New: Fields in marc display not the same
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '14

29 Oct '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7933 Priority: P5 - low Change sponsored?: --- Bug ID: 7933 Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Summary: Fields in marc display not the same QA Contact: koha.sekjal(a)gmail.com Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: nengard(a)gmail.com URL: /cgi-bin/koha/opac-MARCdetail.pl?biblionumber=22543 Hardware: All Status: NEW Version: master Component: OPAC Product: Koha Created attachment 9045 --> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=9045&action=edit labeled marc with no 090 If you click to view the marc display of a record in the OPAC it doesn't show all of your fields. If you click 'view plain' you do see all the fields. If it's MARC view you should see all the filled in fields on both views, just with a slightly different view. For example see the attached images - the 090 is there on view plain, but not on the labeled view. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 42

[Bug 6739] New: expired patrons not blocked from opac actions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '14

29 Oct '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6739 Bug #: 6739 Summary: expired patrons not blocked from opac actions Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: Patrons AssignedTo: kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: nengard(a)gmail.com QAContact: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com A patron with an expired card can still renew books and place holds via the opac. Since the staff can't do these thing without renewing the patron's card shouldn't the patron be blocked in the OPAC as well? Also, there should be some kind of note to the patron that the account has expired and they need to see a librarian. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 169

[Bug 7362] New: Allow searching by item number as a fallback
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Oct '14

21 Oct '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7362 Bug #: 7362 Summary: Allow searching by item number as a fallback Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation AssignedTo: kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz QAContact: ian.walls(a)bywatersolutions.com CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com If a library has many items not barcoded, then it'd be good to be able to have them do circulation using the item number. This development will allow using the item number as a fallback if no barcode match was found. To do: * Add a syspref that enables falling back to the item number * When a search is done in the circ interface, and a matching barcode is not found, and the syspref is on: ** Attempt to load an item with a matching item ID and present that. * Update the template to note that it was searching by item number as well, for error messages. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 7844] New: plack scripts for startup
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7844 Priority: P5 - low Change sponsored?: --- Bug ID: 7844 Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Summary: plack scripts for startup QA Contact: koha.sekjal(a)gmail.com Severity: enhancement Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: dpavlin(a)rot13.org Hardware: All Status: NEW Version: master Component: Command-line Utilities Product: Koha Last missing peace to get started with plack is tooling. http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Plack does provide some information, psgi files and startup scripts should also be part of main repository for easy deployment on sendboxes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 45

[Bug 6328] New: Fine in days does not work
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6328 Bug #: 6328 Summary: Fine in days does not work Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: rel_3_4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: Circulation AssignedTo: kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: paul.poulain(a)biblibre.com QAContact: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Some code coming from BibLibre has been lost in the process of inclusion in 3.4. The result is that fine in days does not work at all (you can setup rules, but it does nothing) Step to reproduce: Koha > Admin > circ rules > set 1 day fine every day of overdue for default rule Issue a book return date last week check-in the book => no debarment is set The following patch will fix all of those problems by : * updating borrowers.debarred to a date field (instead of tinyint). It contains the limit of the debarment * changing API of DebarMember and UpdateBorrowerDebarred to pass a date * display debarrdate where applicable. Note that a debarrdate of 31/12/9999 is considered as unlimited and not displayed * added a debarrcomment, usefull to explain why a patron is debarred (this is independant from debarrdate changes and can be used when placing an unlimited debarment too) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 64

[Bug 6190] New: Custom field removal from patron entry screens
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6190 Bug #: 6190 Summary: Custom field removal from patron entry screens Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: rel_3_6 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Patrons AssignedTo: kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: srdjan(a)catalyst.net.nz QAContact: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Implement a mechanism for removing unwanted fields from the entry screens. It will be a syspref, BorrowerUnwantedField, that will have the same format as BorrowerMandatoryField -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 54

[Bug 7167] New: updatedatabase improvements
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7167 Bug #: 7167 Summary: updatedatabase improvements Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing AssignedTo: paul.poulain(a)biblibre.com ReportedBy: paul.poulain(a)biblibre.com QAContact: ian.walls(a)bywatersolutions.com During the hackfest in Mumbaï, 5 of us had a brainstorming about database changes to try to improve it. Here are the goals: * must result in patches being easier to test by testers (to sign-off) * must result in less conflict when trying to apply a patch with a DB update when another patch has been applied (the .XXXX problem) * must fix the linear problem (where patches are applied in a completly linear way) * be easy to implement We throwed many ideas, here is the one that seems both easy and usefull : * patches would be submitted in a specific file, in atomicupdate directory * a new file (YAML) would be added, that would have 2 columns, one for the version number, one for the atomicupdate file name * updatedatabase wouldn't change anymore: we would just add something like : LoadYAMLFile() ForEachLine { if (C4::Context->preference("Version") < FirstColumnYAML) { exec(secondColumnYAML); SetVersion (FirstColumnYAML); } } The YAML file would be updated only by the Release Manager, when he pushes a patch. This idea fully achieve most of our initial goals: * (very) easy to implement * it will be easier to test a patch : is there an atomic update in the patch ? OK, to test it, i'll first execute the file * there won't be any conflict anymore of a patch applied and your .XXXX file not applying anymore, needing a rebase * it fixes partially the linear problem = if you have a local branch, you can see what has been applied just looking in the yaml file. Let's say Limoges library has sponsored stuff that has resulted in atomicupdate/limogeupdate.pl Those changes are live in Limoges, but still not in official/community version. The Limoges YAML file will be: 3.07.0001 Community_change1.pl 3.07.0002 community_change2.pl localchange limogesupdate.pl 3.07.0003 community_change3.pl the "localchange" in first column will mean for the updater : "OK, apply the change but don't change the version number" When the localchange has been applied on master community branch, the official/community YAML file will look like: 3.07.0001 Community_change1.pl 3.07.0002 community_change2.pl 3.07.0003 community_change3.pl 3.07.0004 limogesupdate.pl Switching back limoges to a community version would require some manual checking, but that will be *much* easier than what we have today : * diff limoges.yaml official.yaml * apply community changes if/where needed * UPDATE systempreferences SET kohaversion=3.07.0004 manually It's done ! And if the localchange that has been made is never merged into master, whatever the reason, it will be easier to keep track of it too. And if you want to apply a submitted patch to your local setup before it's pushed onto master, you can, just by running the file in atomicupdate directory. And add a "localchange" line to your YAML file to remember the change you've made. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 308

[Bug 7712] New: a single holds report
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 Oct '14

08 Oct '14

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7712 Priority: P5 - low Change sponsored?: --- Bug ID: 7712 CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Assignee: koha.sekjal(a)gmail.com Summary: a single holds report QA Contact: koha.sekjal(a)gmail.com Severity: enhancement Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: melia(a)bywatersolutions.com Hardware: All Status: NEW Version: master Component: Hold requests Product: Koha Koha currently has two holds reports: Holds to Pull and Holds Queue. The difference between them is often unclear and confusing. The system shall provide a single report page to detail which materials should be pulled from a branches shelves, and where these items should be sent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4