October 2013 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 10824] New: OAI-PMH repository/server not handling time in "from" argument
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10824 Bug ID: 10824 Summary: OAI-PMH repository/server not handling time in "from" argument Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently, if you try to use time in a "from" argument with the Koha OAI-PMH repository/server, you'll get unexpected results. Case 1: There are 3 records with the following timestamps: 2013-09-02 10:29:40 2013-09-05 13:44:33 2013-09-05 13:44:34 However, if you sent a request using "2013-09-02 8:29:40" or "2013-09-02T8:29:40Z" (the latter being the 'proper' way), you'll only retrieve the last 2 records of the 3 record set. This is because we're using this code to check the "from" and "until" arguments: "WHERE DATE(timestamp) >= ? AND DATE(timestamp) <= ?" We need to strip DATE() from around the timestamps. If we just compare the normal timestamp, MySQL can handle properly compare the timestamp against the following strings: "2013-09-02" "2013-09-02 8:29:40" "2013-09-02T8:29:40Z" (NB This one produces a warning (not an error) so it's less than ideal) I'm proposing that we remove DATE() and include a regex to strip UTC designators T and Z. This way, we'll always be passing in "2013-09-02" or "2013-09-02 8:29:40" which work perfectly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 21

[Bug 10855] New: Additional fields for subscriptions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10855 Bug ID: 10855 Summary: Additional fields for subscriptions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Serials Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com Some customer requests are about creating custom fields for serials. In order to avoir new specific fields for each customers, this feature will add a new module to create fields dynamically. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 283

[Bug 8438] New: Users should only claim for serials related to their branch.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8438 Priority: P5 - low Change sponsored?: --- Bug ID: 8438 CC: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Summary: Users should only claim for serials related to their branch. Severity: enhancement Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)biblibre.com Hardware: All Status: NEW Version: unspecified Component: Serials Product: Koha Only superlibrarian users and users with superserials permission could override this limitation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 66

[Bug 5685] New: Validation of email address field
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5685 Summary: Validation of email address field Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Patrons AssignedTo: kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: druthb(a)gmail.com QAContact: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 It is possible to put things in the borrower.email field that are not emails--"none" and "N/A" seem to be popular with circ desk staff in some places. Naturally, this breaks overdue_notices.pl and other scripts that send email. I suggest a minor enhancement to validate the email address--not to confirm that is a valid email, but only to confirm that it is properly-formatted! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 51

[Bug 10937] New: Option to hide some itemtypes from advanced search
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10937 Bug ID: 10937 Summary: Option to hide some itemtypes from advanced search Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: magnus(a)enger.priv.no Our use case are item types used for ILL - it's possible to hide the records and the items, but the advanced search form is a bit trickier. It would be nice if we could specify which itemtypes are offered as search options in the OPAC advanced search form. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 98

[Bug 10963] New: Simplified creation of MARC21 sample frameworks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10963 Bug ID: 10963 Summary: Simplified creation of MARC21 sample frameworks Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: bgkriegel(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl As mentioned on IRC, use of current sample frameworks is discouraged because they are incomplete or out of sync with default framework. I propose to build sample and fast add frameworks using default framework. New files are smaller and we need to mantain a single framework. Also there will be less strings to translate, when time comes for that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 100

[Bug 7369] New: duplicate item
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7369 Bug #: 7369 Summary: duplicate item Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging AssignedTo: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: nengard(a)gmail.com QAContact: ian.walls(a)bywatersolutions.com It would be nice when coming back to a bib record with items on it already to be able to choose an item to duplicate. You can duplicate bib records and subscriptions under their edit menus, but the only way to duplicate an item is to use add and duplicate which is only done when adding a new item - but often you want to duplicate an existing item at a later date and this would allow that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 45

[Bug 10933] New: PurgeSearchHistory should be merge into the C4::Search::History module
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10933 Bug ID: 10933 Summary: PurgeSearchHistory should be merge into the C4::Search::History module Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 31

[Bug 7895] New: Add Plack/FastCGI/mod_perl server configuration and Zebra info to about
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7895 Priority: P5 - low Change sponsored?: --- Bug ID: 7895 Assignee: nengard(a)gmail.com Summary: Add Plack/FastCGI/mod_perl server configuration and Zebra info to about QA Contact: koha.sekjal(a)gmail.com Severity: enhancement Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: dpavlin(a)rot13.org Hardware: All Status: NEW Version: rel_3_6 Component: About Product: Koha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 11122] New: publisher code and publication year not fetched in acq orders
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11122 Bug ID: 11122 Summary: publisher code and publication year not fetched in acq orders Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolyn.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In acquisition, several templates try to display publisher code and publication year : invoice.tt, parcel.tt, transferorder.tt. Thoses pages use C4::Acquisition methods GetPendingOrders or GetInvoiceDetails. The bug is that in the SQL query of those methods, biblioitems.publishercode and biblioitems.publicationyear. In uncertainprice.pl those datas are fetch using GetBiblioData. It whould be better to fetch them in GetPendingOrders and GetInvoiceDetails. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 31