June 2013 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 9681] New: Add some indexes in database
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Sep '13

24 Sep '13

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9681 Bug ID: 9681 Summary: Add some indexes in database Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Database Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: fridolyn.somers(a)biblibre.com Some table columns should have an index to speed SQL queries : - statistics table has only one index (used to make heavy queries for reports) - itemtype should have an index in items and biblioitems (this is used in circulation to check the number of existing issues of a specific item type) - issue.branchcode and issue.issuingbranch Note that the fact that an index is automatically created for foreign keys in InnoBD seems to be in discussion, so better create it explicitly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 10503] New: incorrect initialization parameters passed Memoize::Memcached
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Sep '13

23 Sep '13

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10503 Bug ID: 10503 Summary: incorrect initialization parameters passed Memoize::Memcached Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Currently, Memoize::Memcached is initialized like this: eval { if (C4::Context->ismemcached) { require Memoize::Memcached; import Memoize::Memcached qw(memoize_memcached); memoize_memcached( 'GetMarcStructure', memcached => C4::Context->memcached); } }; C4::Context->memcached returns a Cache::Memcached object. However, that's not what Memoize::Memcached expects: This function also accepts a memcached option, which expects a hashref. This is de-referenced and passed directly into an internal function which sets up the memcached configuration for that function. This contents of this hashref are mostly options passed to Cache::Memcached, with a few exceptions. However, passing a Cache::Memcached happened to work, by coincidence, as Memoize::Memcached was calling UNIVERSAL::isa (in a deprecated fashion [0]) to check to see whether the passed argument is a HASH. Nowadays, though, since UNIVERSAL->import is deprecated, the version of Memoize::Memcached packaged for Debian Wheezy now uses ref() to check whether the argument is a hash [1]. That means that the coincidence no longer works, and consequently MARC frameworks don't get cached via memcached in Debian Wheezy, leading to a performance degradation. The solution is to pass Memoize::Memcached what it needs -- a hashref with the Cache::Memcached arguments -- and not a Cache::Memcached object. [0] https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=68170 [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614868 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 16

[Bug 10487] New: UT: GetMaxPickupDate needs unit tests.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Sep '13

23 Sep '13

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10487 Bug ID: 10487 Summary: UT: GetMaxPickupDate needs unit tests. Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)biblibre.com GetMaxPickupDate is introduced by bug 8367. It needs unit tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 10194] New: OpacHiddenItems doesn't work for MARC view
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Sep '13

21 Sep '13

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10194 Bug ID: 10194 Summary: OpacHiddenItems doesn't work for MARC view Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de When using OpacHiddenItems the settings only hide items in the normal view, but not in the MARC view (labelled and plain). Also the items are not removed from the exported MARCXML/MARC. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 9410] New: Formatting of the discount field when doing a new order from new empty record is not correct
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Sep '13

20 Sep '13

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9410 Bug ID: 9410 Summary: Formatting of the discount field when doing a new order from new empty record is not correct Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: hugh(a)davenport.net.nz Discount shows 4 decimal places, it should show 1 like other places that show discount rate -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 8911] New: docs/history.txt file missing for about.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Sep '13

19 Sep '13

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8911 Priority: P5 - low Change sponsored?: --- Bug ID: 8911 CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Summary: docs/history.txt file missing for about.pl Severity: minor Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: mtompset(a)hotmail.com Hardware: All Status: NEW Version: rel_3_8 Component: Packaging Product: Koha When opening about, three error log entries were triggered. Two were silent warnings, and an entry caused by this file not being there. Upon further research, I discovered that the entire docs directory was not in /usr/share/koha/intranet/cgi/docs as it is expected by the about.pl module. I copied the docs directory from the tarball, and the error disappeared. I believe it is a packaging issue which should be fixed on a forward basis. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 17

[Bug 8360] New: Author facet not working
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Sep '13

18 Sep '13

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8360 Priority: P5 - low Change sponsored?: --- Bug ID: 8360 Assignee: adrien.saurat(a)biblibre.com Summary: Author facet not working Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: adrien.saurat(a)biblibre.com Hardware: All Status: ASSIGNED Version: master Component: OPAC Product: Koha After a search on the OPAC, clicking on the Author facet gives bad results, sometimes an empty screen when several biblios should appear. It is so in UNIMARC at least, and I'll propose a patch for this (correcting the facet construction by adding wordlist "wrdl" to the limit parameter), but if MARC21 biblios have the same problem I'll make a version with both codes modified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 6920] New: deleting bibs messes with budgets
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Sep '13

18 Sep '13

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6920 Bug #: 6920 Summary: deleting bibs messes with budgets Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: Acquisitions AssignedTo: henridamien(a)koha-fr.org ReportedBy: nengard(a)gmail.com QAContact: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Example from a library I talked to today: An order was placed for an item using a brief record (with ISBN). While waiting for the order to arrive a fuller record was imported from OCLC using the ISBN match, but the match was not found so duplicates were created. The library deleted the brief record because the OCLC one was fuller and this left a hole in the order and screwed up the accounting. The next time they chose to merge the OCLC and brief record together but the same thing happened because the bib number from the brief record was lost in the merge. -------------- All libraries are going to delete bib records at some point and if those records were created using acquisitions then the budgeting is going to be inaccurate. It will also leave holes on baskets when viewing them with links to records that do not exist. We need a way to keep the link between acq and the catalog without allowing changing in cataloging to mess up orders in acq. Another solution is to update the merge tool to look at the acq tables and change the bib number if records are merged - but that's secondary to the bigger problem of the bib being able to cause so many problems when deleted. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 9324] New: Reserves cannot be deleted with DEBUG on under Plack
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Sep '13

18 Sep '13

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9324 Bug ID: 9324 Summary: Reserves cannot be deleted with DEBUG on under Plack Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jcamins(a)cpbibliography.com CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When I try to delete a reserve I get the following error: DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Duplicate entry '10' for key 'PRIMARY' at /home/jcamins/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 1081.DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Duplicate entry '10' for key 'PRIMARY' at /home/jcamins/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 1081. at /home/jcamins/kohaclone/reserve/modrequest.pl line 91 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 7973] New: Allow for new type of LDAP authentication
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Sep '13

18 Sep '13

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7973 Priority: P5 - low Change sponsored?: --- Bug ID: 7973 CC: dpavlin(a)rot13.org Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Summary: Allow for new type of LDAP authentication QA Contact: koha.sekjal(a)gmail.com Severity: enhancement Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: tdavis(a)uttyler.edu Hardware: All Status: NEW Version: master Component: Authentication Product: Koha For some ldap setups there is a different sequence for authentication that koha doesn't account for. The steps are: 1) Bind with a service account 2) Search for user entered 3) Bind as user if found -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 64