November 2016 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 5366] Koha does not work right with MariaDB
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5366 Chris Cormack <chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|Failed QA |RESOLVED --- Comment #25 from Chris Cormack <chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz> --- It's not, we have almost all of our production sites running with mariaDB. I will close this -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14793] New cataloguing plugin unimarc_field_225a_bis
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14793 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|new feature |enhancement CC| |katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15200] t/Creators.t fails when using build-git-snapshot
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15200 --- Comment #19 from Mirko Tietgen <mirko(a)abunchofthings.net> --- This one applies to 16.05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15200] t/Creators.t fails when using build-git-snapshot
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15200 Mirko Tietgen <mirko(a)abunchofthings.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #54291|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #18 from Mirko Tietgen <mirko(a)abunchofthings.net> --- Created attachment 57716 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=57716&action=ed… Bug 15200 - t/Creators.t fails when using build-git-snapshot ttf-dejavu was missing from the build dependencies. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15503] Grab Item Information from Order Files
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15503 Benjamin Daeuber <bdaeuber(a)cityoffargo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Patch doesn't apply |Failed QA --- Comment #41 from Benjamin Daeuber <bdaeuber(a)cityoffargo.com> --- Looks like collection code is also not mapping, it's appearing to on the initial import screen, but when the item is created, it it has no collection code. This is also inconsistent with the behavior of item type, which is mapping to the top item type alphabetically. Both collection code and item type are required by us, so it's odd to have nothing there when item type has the wrong information, but at least has information present. If a library does not map item type at all, will one be assigned? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15503] Grab Item Information from Order Files
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15503 --- Comment #40 from Benjamin Daeuber <bdaeuber(a)cityoffargo.com> --- Created attachment 57715 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=57715&action=ed… Test order record with 2 items and all fields mapped I want to provide an example of what Kyle is talking about. I will attach the marc record we used to the ticket for reference. To summarize, the two issues: Item type did not appear to map at all. Even on initial import (i.e the order edit screen when adding to a basket), it simply shows the our top collection alphabetically. Second is that on initial import, non for loan appears correct, but does not seem to survive the import (all items show as available). I believe this is what Kyle is referring to. My mapping: homebranch: 975$a holdingbranch: 975$b itype: 975$c nonpublic_note: 975$d public_note: 975$e loc: 975$f ccode: 975$g price: 975$h replacementprice: 975$i itemcallnumber: 975$j quantity: 975$k budget_code: 975$l notforloan: 975$m uri: 975$n copyno: 975$o -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8835] Two indexes on biblioitems.issn
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8835 Kyle M Hall <kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com Status|Passed QA |Pushed to Master --- Comment #17 from Kyle M Hall <kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- Pushed to master for 16.11, thanks Marcel! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 5366] Koha does not work right with MariaDB
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5366 M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtompset(a)hotmail.com --- Comment #24 from M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> --- (In reply to Marc Véron from comment #23) > Is this bug still valid? *timeout* *ping* I'm not sure this is still valid, because if we have Jenkins running MariaDB, then someone must have got it working. Though, http://jenkins.koha-community.org/ doesn't seem like it is working, so I am wondering too: is this bug still valid? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13726] Koha::Acquisition::Bookseller should use Koha::Object
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13726 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #57263|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- Created attachment 57714 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=57714&action=ed… Bug 13726: Make Koha::Acq::Bookseller using Koha::Object This patch create a Koha::Acquisition::Booksellers module and Koha::Acquisition::Bookseller::Contract[s] modules. All code in the acquisition module is adapted to use the CRUD methods of Koha::Object[s]. The former C4 routines are removed. Test plan: Since a lot of files are impacted by this patch, try a complete acquisition workflow and try to catch errors. Be focused on bookseller and bookseller' contacts data. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13726] Koha::Acquisition::Bookseller should use Koha::Object
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13726 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |17668 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17668 [Bug 17668] typo in parcel.pl listinct vs listincgst -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0