August 2016 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 14549] Hold not removed when item is checked out to patron who is not next in priority list
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '16

24 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14549 Nick Clemens <nick(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nick(a)bywatersolutions.com --- Comment #2 from Nick Clemens <nick(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- Ah, I can recreate, but only after build_holds_queue has been run and picked up the hold for the first patron -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15541] Prevent normalization during matching/import process
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '16

24 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15541 --- Comment #26 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #25) > Considering you have written a patch, and I have not, I'd like to see yours > get it in ;) > > David, is this patch still in good condition? If so I'd be willing to test > and sign-off. > Sorry for the delay. Didn't see your comment until now. I'll have to review the patch, but I'll get back to you this week. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14549] Hold not removed when item is checked out to patron who is not next in priority list
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '16

24 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14549 Tim Hannah <timdhannah(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |timdhannah(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14567] Browse interface for OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '16

24 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14567 Nick Clemens <nick(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Change sponsored?|--- |Sponsored -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14567] Browse interface for OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '16

24 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14567 Nick Clemens <nick(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|robin(a)catalyst.net.nz |nick(a)bywatersolutions.com CC| |nick(a)bywatersolutions.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11019] Require some fields when adding authorized value category
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '16

24 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11019 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Passed QA |In Discussion CC| |katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de --- Comment #14 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Hm, I just took a look at this and I have a problem: Sometimes we like to add an empty authorised value to appear as an empty/unset entry in a a pull down list. An example: Extended patron attribute linked to an authorised value list. The empty entry is the first in the list and will show if the field is empty/was not imported. Could we remove the required form the actual authorised value? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13895] Add API routes for checkouts retrieval and renewal
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '16

24 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13895 --- Comment #37 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- But I certainly like the idea of centralizing the permission checks :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13895] Add API routes for checkouts retrieval and renewal
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '16

24 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13895 --- Comment #36 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- I think what scares me off is that 'anyone' will be able to use the API to some extend - I am thinking of it not so much as a thing accessible to end users I guess. There would be no way to control who uses certain functionality. Maybe too paranoid? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15438] Checking out an on-hold item sends holder' s borrowernumber in AF (screen message) field.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Aug '16

23 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15438 --- Comment #8 from Nick Clemens <nick(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- (In reply to Christopher Brannon from comment #7) > Are there instructions somewhere to setup and configure SIP on the backend? > If so, I could try to setup a test environment on my VM and test the patch. Some documentation here: https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_SIP2_server_setup Basically you can: 1 - enable and start sip using package commands 2 - make sure the patrons listed in SIPconfig.xml exist in Koha 3 - Use sip_cli_emulator from the koha-shell Use localhost and port 6001 That should do it -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15438] Checking out an on-hold item sends holder' s borrowernumber in AF (screen message) field.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Aug '16

23 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15438 --- Comment #7 from Christopher Brannon <cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #5) > Christopher, > Since my understanding of the code under C4/SIP is closed to 0, I have tried > to fix what you described but did not try the patch. > I am not sure at all it's the best way to fix it, but at least we have a > patch to start :) Are there instructions somewhere to setup and configure SIP on the backend? If so, I could try to setup a test environment on my VM and test the patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0