January 2017 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 16694] New: Limit SIP2 auth by patron attribute
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Dec '24

10 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16694 Bug ID: 16694 Summary: Limit SIP2 auth by patron attribute Change sponsored?: Sponsored Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Authentication Assignee: magnus(a)libriotech.no Reporter: magnus(a)libriotech.no QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: dpavlin(a)rot13.org In Scandinavia "more open" (Swedish: "Meröppet", Norwegian: "Meråpent") is a hot issue at the moment. What this means is that patrons can use their card and password/PIN to lock themselves into the library even when staff is not around. Typically, this means that patrons can get access to the library building from 7 am to 11 pm, even if the library is only staffed from 8 am to 5 pm. Typically, SIP2 is used to communnicate between the "more open"-system and the ILS, specifically to authenticate the user with a username and password/PIN. Also, you want the ability to turn "more open" access on and off for patrons. An extended patron attribute with possible values of NULL/empty, 0 or 1 should serve well for this. SIP2 does not have a field for saying "this is a moreopen login", so we need a way to identify a SIP2 user as a moreopen user. My plan is to add another attribute to the login element in SIPConfig.xml to achieve this: <login id="koha" password="koha" delimiter="|" error-detect="enabled" institution="kohalibrary" patron-attribute="MEROPPET" /> "MEROPPET" is then the name of an extended patron attribute which can be set to NULL or 0 (patron should not have access to moreopen) or 1 (patron should have access). This should be flexible enough to allow other, similar schemes to use some other patron attribute. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 43

[Bug 17976] New: TT syntax for notices - Add an equivalence for items.fine
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Dec '24

05 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17976 Bug ID: 17976 Summary: TT syntax for notices - Add an equivalence for items.fine Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax. We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template using the TT syntax. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 39

[Bug 17628] New: Move bibliographic related code to Koha::Biblio
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Dec '24

05 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17628 Bug ID: 17628 Summary: Move bibliographic related code to Koha::Biblio Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 31

[Bug 17598] New: Make use of itemtypes.summary
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Nov '24

28 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17598 Bug ID: 17598 Summary: Make use of itemtypes.summary Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: magnus(a)libriotech.no QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org There is a field called itemtypes.summary in the DB, but as far as I have been able to tell, it is not displayed anywhere. Please enlighten me if I am wrong! :-) Here is the definition in installer/data/mysql/kohastructure.sql: summary text, -- information from the summary field, may include HTML -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 16846] New: Move patron related code to Koha::Patron
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Nov '24

19 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16846 Bug ID: 16846 Summary: Move patron related code to Koha::Patron Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 70

[Bug 17729] New: Move IsItemOnHoldAndFound to Koha::Holds
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Nov '24

18 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17729 Bug ID: 17729 Summary: Move IsItemOnHoldAndFound to Koha::Holds Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 27

[Bug 17798] New: Checking out an item on hold for another patron prints a slip but does not update hold
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Nov '24

15 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17798 Bug ID: 17798 Summary: Checking out an item on hold for another patron prints a slip but does not update hold Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com To recreate: Place a hold for patron A Do not confirm the hold Checkout that item to Patron B See the options including 'Don't checkout and print slip' Print the slip Check the item record The hold has not been confirmed and the item 'last seen' is not updated For consistency printing should confirm the hold as well and mark the item waiting or initiate a transfer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 37

[Bug 17318] New: Make 'Normalization rule' configurable on matchpoint definition
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17318 Bug ID: 17318 Summary: Make 'Normalization rule' configurable on matchpoint definition Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently, there's a free text field on matchpoint definition, that is of no use, as the code does some default normalization no matter what you put there (se screenshot). As pointed out on 17304 and other bugs, this normalization routine is counter productive. The purpose of this bug is to introduce a way for defining the normalization rules we'd like to apply. IT will make use of bug 17302 to have a small (but useful) list of normalization routines. This could be expanded if needed, or we could even make plugins do it (that'd certaintly belong to another bug report). I don't think removing the 'feature' is a good move now, but we could consider it with broader discussion. Someone should rise it in koha-devel, meetings, etc. This will provide a way out, until we end that fine-grained discussion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 36

[Bug 16264] New: Confirm message on deleting an authority framework subfield
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Nov '24

07 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16264 Bug ID: 16264 Summary: Confirm message on deleting an authority framework subfield Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: aleishaamohia(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Just using this as an example because it appears in many places on the intranet Is there a reason that we navigate to a new page to confirm or cancel a delete rather than just using a Javascript confirm message? A JS message would use much less code. I realise that in the past we had a rule that everything had to work without JS enabled but a lot of stuff on the intranet wouldn't work at all without JS so I'm not sure how much that applies anymore. Anyway, just wondering if these extra pages for confirm or cancelling a delete are still necessary or if we can do this via JS now :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 16698] New: UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin preference needs a gui editor
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Nov '24

07 Nov '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 Bug ID: 16698 Summary: UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin preference needs a gui editor Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Bug 14576 adds a new syspref that accepts YAML for determining how the rules are applied. While there are other prefs accepting values in the same way, we should not expect users to understand YAML text formatting and should offer an easier option for entering the data We should decide on a best practice here for adding these guis. One option is to add pages on admin, however, I think this could get overwhelming the more sysprefs that use this method. I would propose adding a popup editor that will allow for easy entry, this editor will populate the syspref value so that advanced users can still access directly. Welcome to hear other thoughts, will proceed as proposed until then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7