October 2017 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 15486] Restrict number of holds placed by day
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '17

30 Oct '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15486 Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Needs Signoff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15486] Restrict number of holds placed by day
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '17

30 Oct '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15486 Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #68791|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 2454] Improve display of credits on pay fines tab
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '17

30 Oct '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2454 M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtompset(a)hotmail.com --- Comment #14 from M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #13) > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in > koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/members/pay.tt > > Please do NOT modify the indentation when you do not modify the line or > create a new block. That will avoid this kind of unnecessary rebases. "If you want to reindent large amounts of existing code in connection with a bugfix or enhancement, you must do so in a separate patch from the one with code changes (unless the reindent is required due to the addition or removal of an indentation level (for example, an additional if added around a block)." https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Coding_Guidelines#PERL6:_Indentation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 17380] New: Cannot edit authorities with authtypecode = default
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '17

30 Oct '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17380 Bug ID: 17380 Summary: Cannot edit authorities with authtypecode = default Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 16.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: joachim.ganseman(a)ehb.be QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 55947 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=55947&action=ed… Example: after trying to merge PERSO_NAME and TOPIC_TERM "Rossini", the PERSO_NAME record is now authtypecoded as "default" and cannot be edited anymore Editing authorities whose authtypecode is not set to a common value is not possible in Koha 16.05 . This occurs e.g. after trying to (accidentally) merge a PERSO_NAME and TOPIC_TERM authority into one. The resulting authority will have its authtypecode set to "default". Upon trying to correct such an authority, it turns out to be impossible to edit the said authority. An error very similar to 'Can't call method "authtypecode" on an undefined value' appears instead of the editor. This occurs even when there are no authority frameworks defined (i.e. all in the default frameworks), in Koha 16.05 on Debian. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 56

[Bug 3841] Add a Default ACQ framework
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '17

30 Oct '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3841 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- I think a first step would be to have a ACQ framework that does not introduce regression and remove the warning message. This is what does the patch. The need here was bug 19289. If ACQ needs to be improved/tweaked, I think it should be done on a separate bug report (maybe it will depend on the MARC flavour, languages, etc.?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 12227] remove demo user functionality
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '17

30 Oct '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12227 Kyle M Hall <kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #67617|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #6 from Kyle M Hall <kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- Created attachment 68837 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=68837&action=ed… Bug 12227: Remove the demo functionality This is a legacy mode that did not really work. Test plan: Play with frameworks and sysprefs and confirm the changes (add/del/update) are taken into account. Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley(a)catalyst.net.nz> Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 12227] remove demo user functionality
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '17

30 Oct '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12227 Kyle M Hall <kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Passed QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14407] Limit web-based self-checkout to specific IP addresses
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '17

30 Oct '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14407 Nicholas van Oudtshoorn <vanoudt(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #68835|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #39 from Nicholas van Oudtshoorn <vanoudt(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 68836 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=68836&action=ed… Allow restricting SCO to IP or IP range Ah no! One more bit of noise - a very minor copy-and-paste mistake... in the copyright statement in the new unit test Auth.t! Hopefully this is now it! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14407] Limit web-based self-checkout to specific IP addresses
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '17

30 Oct '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14407 Nicholas van Oudtshoorn <vanoudt(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #68834|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #38 from Nicholas van Oudtshoorn <vanoudt(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 68835 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=68835&action=ed… Allow restricting SCO to IP or IP range Sorry for the noise - running on two git instances, and forgot to include the required updates to Auth.pm that testing revealed. Now fails secure if invalid IP ranges are set... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14407] Limit web-based self-checkout to specific IP addresses
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '17

30 Oct '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14407 Nicholas van Oudtshoorn <vanoudt(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff --- Comment #37 from Nicholas van Oudtshoorn <vanoudt(a)gmail.com> --- Added unit tests for in_ipset -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0